Wright v. Commissioner of Social Security

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
Ronald Douglas Wright, 	Case No. 3:26-cv-205
Plaintiff,
v. 	ORDER AND
JUDGEMENT ENTRY
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
On February 4, 2026, United States Magistrate Judge Reuben J. Sheperd issued a Report and
Recommendation (“R & R”) recommending I deny Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma
pauperis. (Doc. No. 4). In the R & R, he notified the parties:
Within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and recommendation, a
party may serve and file specific written objections to the proposed findings and
recommendations of the magistrate judge. Rule 72(b)(2), Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure; see also 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.3(b). . . . Failure to file
objections within the specified time may result in the forfeiture or waiver of the right
to raise the issue on appeal either to the district judge or in a subsequent appeal to
the United States Court of Appeals, depending on how or whether the party
responds to the report and recommendation. Berkshire v. Dahl, 928 F.3d 520, 530 (6th
Cir. 2019).
(Id. at 4).
More than fourteen days passed, and no party filed any objection to the R & R. I consider
their failure to file objections to “constitute a waiver of subsequent review,” Local R. 72.3(b), and
adopt Judge Sheperd’s R & R in its entirety as the final Order of this Court. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s
motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. (Doc. No. 2).
So Ordered.
s/ Jeffrey J. Helmick
United States District Judge
Case: 3:26-cv-00205-JJH Doc #: 6 Filed: 03/31/26 1 of 1. PageID #: <pageID>