McDougleh v. Ohio Reformatory for Women et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
Sapphire McDougleh,
Plaintiff,
V.
Ohio Reformatory for Women, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 2:25-cv-28
Judge Michael H. Watson
Magistrate Judge Deavers
ORDER
When Plaintiff failed to take the necessary steps to complete service of
process or respond to a Show Cause Order regarding the same, the Magistrate
Judge issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), recommending that the
Court dismiss this case without prejudice for failure to prosecute. R&R, ECF No.
30. The R&R notified Plaintiff of her right to object to that recommendation and
of the consequences of failing to do so. Id. at 4. Plaintiff failed to object.
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the R&R without performing a de novo review
and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE this case for failure to prosecute,
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
ICHAEL . ATSON, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case: 2:25-cv-00028-MHW-SCS Doc #: 31 Filed: 03/17/26 Page: 1 of 1 PAGEID #: <pageID>