USA v. Wilson et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Case No. CR-25-398-SLP
)
DOYLE GLEN WILSON, )
)
Defendant. )
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Before Court is the Government’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 63]. The
Government seeks dismissal of Count 6 of the Indictment, charging Defendant with felon
in possession of firearms, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The Government states that
since the Indictment, “case agents have obtained new information and re-examined the
charges against [Defendant].”
Under Rule 48(a), “courts must grant prosecutors leave to dismiss charges unless
dismissal is clearly contrary to manifest public interest.” United States v. Robertson, 45
F.3d 1423, 1437 n.14 (10th Cir. 1995) (quoting Rinaldi v. United States, 434 U.S. 22, 30
(1977)); see also United States v. Delagarza, 650 F.2d 1166, 1167 (10th Cir. 1981) (per
curiam) (“An indictment may be dismissed by the U.S. attorney prior to trial and with leave
of the court. . . . The same rule governs the dismissal of one or more counts of an
indictment.”). The Court finds that dismissal of the charge against Defendant is not
contrary to the public interest or otherwise for any improper purpose. Accordingly, the
Government’s Motion is GRANTED.
Case 5:25-cr-00398-SLP Document 67 Filed 11/13/25 Page 1 of 2

2
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Count 6 of the Indictment, charging Doyle
Glen Wilson with 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and the forfeiture allegations corresponding to
Count 6, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of November, 2025.
Case 5:25-cr-00398-SLP Document 67 Filed 11/13/25 Page 2 of 2