Bruner v. State of Oklahoma et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
JAMELE R. BRUNER,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, et al.,
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CIV-26-622-SLP
O R D E R
Petitioner, a state pretrial detainee appearing pro se, filed a Petition for Writ of
Mandamus [Doc. No. 1]. 	On April 1, 2026, United States Magistrate Judge Chris M.
Stephens entered a Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 5] (R&R) recommending the
Court dismiss the action without prejudice because Petitioner’s claims are frivolous and
the Court lacks jurisdiction to hear his claims.
The Magistrate Judge advised Petitioner of his right to object to the R&R and
directed any objections be filed on or before April 22, 2026. 	Id. at 5–6. The Magistrate
Judge further advised Petitioner that any failure to object would waive Petitioner’s right to
appellate review of the factual and legal issues addressed in the R&R. To date, no objection
to the R&R has been filed nor has an extension of time in which to object been sought or
granted. 	Therefore, the Court finds that Plaintiff has waived further review of all issues
addressed in the R&R. See Casanova v. Ulibarri, 595 F.3d 1120, 1123 (10th Cir. 2010).
Upon review, the Court concurs with the analysis set forth in the R&R.
Case 5:26-cv-00622-SLP Document 6 Filed 04/27/26 Page 1 of 2

2
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the R&R [Doc. No. 	5] is ADOPTED in its
entirety and this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. A separate Judgment of
Dismissal shall be entered contemporaneously with this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 27 th day of April, 2026.
Case 5:26-cv-00622-SLP Document 6 Filed 04/27/26 Page 2 of 2