5:26-cv-01083•Singh v. Johnson et al
Testo completo
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA KULDEEP SINGH, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-26-1083-J ) MARKWAYNE MULLIN, et al., ) ) ) Respondents. ) ORDER Petitioner Kuldeep Singh, a citizen of India, is currently in the custody of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. He has filed an Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 seeking release, or in the alternative, a second bond hearing. [Doc. No. 7]. The matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin who issued a Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 14] recommending that the Court deny the Petition. The objection deadline has now passed and neither party has filed an objection, a motion, or otherwise communicated with the Court. The parties have therefore waived the right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues addressed in the Report and Recommendation. See Casanova v. Ulibarri, 595 F.3d 1120, 1123 (10th Cir. 2010). Upon review of the Report and Recommendation and the Immigration Judge’s order denying bond [Doc. No. 10-4], the Court concurs with Judge Erwin’s finding that Petitioner has not established a basis for relief. 8 U.S.C. § 1226(e); Kumar v. De Anda-Ybarra, No. CIV-26- 164-R, 2026 WL 753944, at *1–2 (W.D. Okla. Mar. 17, 2026); Makarevich v. Bondi, No. 1:25- CV-01002-KG-JHR, 2025 WL 3653895, at *1 (D.N.M. Dec. 17, 2025). Accordingly, the Court Case 5:26-cv-01083-J Document 15 Filed 10/08/26 Page 1 of 2
2 ADOPTS the thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 14] and DENIES Petitioner’s Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241.1 A separate judgment will enter. IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of October, 2026. 1 The Court does not issue a certificate of appealability as one “is not required in order to appeal a final order in a proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2241” for a federal inmate. Cano v. Holt, No. CIV- 25-01228-JD, 2026 WL 736461, at *14 (W.D. Okla. Mar. 16, 2026) (citation omitted) (declining to enter a certificate of appealability in a § 2241 immigration case). Case 5:26-cv-01083-J Document 15 Filed 10/08/26 Page 2 of 2
Ti chiedi come si applica questo testo alla tua situazione?
Consulenza gratuita, senza impegno
Descrivi la tua situazione. Il nostro team ti ricontatterà via e-mail per la tua consulenza.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.