DOE v. AMERICA PAC et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOHN DOE, individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated, and BOBBI
PISOR,
Plaintiffs,
v.
AMERICA PAC, GROUP AMERICA,
LLC, and ELON MUSK,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 25-1691
ANTHONY MAGLIETTA, STEVEN
REID, and JERRY VICTORIOUS,
individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
AMERICA PAC, GROUP AMERICA,
LLC, and ELON MUSK,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 25-2364
O R D E R
AND NOW, this 7th day of January, 2026, upon consideration of: (1) Defendants’
Motion to Strike and Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint in Doe v. America PAC (Civil
Action No. 25-1691, ECF Nos. 43 and 51), and Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition thereto (Civil
Action No. 25-1691, ECF No. 48); as well as, (2) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the First
Amended Complaint in Maglietta v. America PAC (Civil Action No. 25-2364, ECF Nos. 31 and
39), and Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition thereto (Civil Action No. 25-2364, ECF No. 36), for
the reasons set forth in the accompanying opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
Case 2:25-cv-01691-WB Document 57 Filed 01/07/26 Page 1 of 2

1. 	Defendants’ Motion to Strike the Second Amended Complaint in Doe v. America
PAC (Civil Action No. 25-1691, ECF No. 43) is DENIED.
2. 	Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint in Doe v.
America PAC (Civil Action No. 25-1691, ECF No. 43) is GRANTED with respect to:
a. 	All claims against Defendant Group America LLC, which is DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER
JURISDICTION pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1);
b. 	Plaintiff John Doe’s claim under the Pennsylvania Wage Payment and Collection
Law, which claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).
3. 	Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint in Doe v. America
PAC (Civil Action No. 25-1691, ECF No. 43) is DENIED in all other respects for the reasons set
forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion.
4. 	Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Complaint in Maglietta v. America PAC (Civil
Action No. 25-2364, ECF No. 31) is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
S/ WENDY BEETLESTONE
_______________________________
WENDY BEETLESTONE, C.J.
Case 2:25-cv-01691-WB Document 57 Filed 01/07/26 Page 2 of 2