Johnson v. City of Humble Precinct 4 et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON DIVISION
Richard C Johnson,
Plaintiff,
v.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil No. 4:26-cv-1724
City of Humble, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Pending is a Report by Magistrate Judge Christina Bryan, recommending that this
case be dismissed with prejudice for being time-barred under the statute of limitations and
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Doc. 16.
Parties may object to any portion of a Magistrate Judge’s report and
recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district court may accept any part of the
report and recommendation to which there is no objection if there is no clear error on the
face of the record. See Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005)
(citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Assoc., 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en
banc)); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee note (1983). When a party objects
a report and recommendation, the district court reviews the objected portions de novo. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); see also United States v. Wilson, 864
F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989) (per curiam).
Neither party filed objections. No clear error otherwise appears upon review and
consideration of the report, the record, and the applicable law. As such, the Report and
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
October 14, 2026
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
Case 4:26-cv-01724 Document 18 Filed 10/14/26 in TXSD Page 1 of 2

2
Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted as the Memorandum and Order of this
Court. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, Doc. 14, is GRANTED. The Complaint, Doc. 1, is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
A final judgment will be entered separately.
SO ORDERED.
SIGNED at Houston, Texas, on the 14th of October, 2026.
__________________________
Nicholas J. Ganjei
United States District Judge
Case 4:26-cv-01724 Document 18 Filed 10/14/26 in TXSD Page 2 of 2