Heirs of Moseley v. Heirs of Moseley

i^pv’yO depositions trien fur ti - gaisAE wove- t.fftred at the — hearkg acd both rej^tet*; <H»e- brc*ii“^ *he deponent? •«Wild not answer atm >»r#m.¿MOtir|o$ the, «,L<?r, because it vrr*i dfwn by the plainiiif’a sttotney. The was- was csitkd tu She Court of Conference, and tiu* 'e argued ; a — i the sense deusrírñ.iiH'í’.on ’.Ta1* :made by that court «itere the caaes v/as ..aJy ?¿"gncd before them»