State v. Vela-Montes

undisputed activities on the property violate the covenants.
Having concluded that the Burdens’ activities are a violation,
summary judgment was appropriate.
CONCLUSION
The decision of the district court is affirmed.
A ffirmed.
mccormAck, J., not participating.
StAte of NebrASkA, Appellee , v.
victor velA-moNteS, AppellANt.
810 N.W.2d 749
Filed March 23, 2012. 	No. S-10-1043.
Petition for further review from the Court of Appeals, irwiN,
cASSel , and pirtle, Judges, on appeal thereto from the District
Court for Douglas County, J. michAel coffey, Judge. Judgment
of Court of Appeals affirmed.
Daniel R. Stockmann, of Dunn & Stockmann, L.L.O., for
appellant.
Jon Bruning, Attorney General, and Kimberly A. Klein
for appellee.
heAvicAN, c.J., wright, coNNolly, StephAN, mccormAck ,
and miller-lermAN, JJ.
per curiAm.
Having reviewed the briefs and record and having heard oral
arguments, we conclude on further review that the decision of
the Nebraska Court of Appeals in State v. Vela-Montes, 19 Neb.
App. 378, 807 N.W.2d 544 (2011), is correct, and accordingly,
we affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals which affirmed
as modified the ruling of the district court.
A ffirmed.
530 	283 NeBRASKA RePORTS
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library
www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/
11/01/2026 04:42 AM CST