302 Neb. 283•U.S. Specialty Ins. Co. v. D S Avionics -- supp. opin.
Testo completo
- 283 - 302 Nebraska Reports U.S. SPECIALTY INS. CO. v. D S AVIONICS Cite as 302 Neb. 283 Nebraska Supreme Court I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this certified document. -- Nebraska Reporter of Decisions U.S. Specialty Insurance Company, a corporation, appellee, v. D S Avionics Unlimited LLC, appellant. 923 N.W.2d 367 Filed February 15, 2019. No. S-17-1101. supplemental opinion Appeal from the District Court for Douglas County: Shelly R. Stratman, Judge. Supplemental opinion: Former opinion modified. Motions for rehearing overruled. Thomas M. Locher, of Locher, Pavelka, Dostal, Braddy & Hammes, L.L.C., for appellant. Robert E. O’Connor, Jr., for appellee. Heavican, C.J., Miller-Lerman, Cassel, Stacy, Funke, and Papik, JJ., and Johnson, District Judge. Per Curiam. This case is before us on motions for rehearing filed by the appellant, D S Avionics Unlimited LLC, and the appellee, U.S. Specialty Insurance Company, concerning our opinion in U.S. Specialty Ins. Co. v. D S Avionics. 1 We overrule the motions, but we modify the opinion as follows: 1 U.S. Specialty Ins. Co. v. D S Avionics, 301 Neb. 388, 918 N.W.2d 589 (2018). Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 11/01/2026 04:15 AM CST
- 284 - 302 Nebraska Reports U.S. SPECIALTY INS. CO. v. D S AVIONICS Cite as 302 Neb. 283 In the “Declaratory Judgment Was Premature” subsection, we strike the third sentence of the first paragraph, including footnote 14. 2 Also in the same subsection, after the fourth sentence of the second paragraph,3 we insert the following sen- tence: “‘This rule embraces not only cases where the identi- cal issues between the same parties are sub judice, but also possibly cases in which the issues only are identical but not the parties.’”4 The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified. Former opinion modified. Motions for rehearing overruled. 2 Id. at 398, 918 N.W.2d at 596. 3 Id. at 399, 918 N.W.2d at 596. 4 Strawn v. County of Sarpy, 146 Neb. 783, 788, 21 N.W.2d 597, 600 (1946).
Ti chiedi come si applica questo testo alla tua situazione?
Consulenza gratuita, senza impegno
Descrivi la tua situazione. Il nostro team ti ricontatterà via e-mail per la tua consulenza.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.