Op 99-003•Ohio Board Advisory Opinion Op 99-003
Testo completo
The Supreme Court of Ohio BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ON GRIEVANCES AND DISCIPLINE 41 SOUTH HIGH STREET-SUITE 3370, COLUMBUS, OH 43215-6105 (614) 644-5800 FAX: (614) 644-5804 OFFICE OF SECRETARY OPINION 99-3 Issued June 4, 1999 [CPR Opinion-provides advice under the Ohio Code of Professional Responsibility which is superseded by the Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct, eff. 2/1/2007.] SYLLABUS: It is proper for an Ohio attorney to be listed in the online membership directory of a professional association. An online membership directory of attorneys in a professional association is considered a law directory intended primarily for the use of the legal profession and is permitted under DR 2-101(B)(2)(c) of the Ohio Code of Professional Responsibility. This advice is not to be construed as blanket approval of attorney listings in other types of online directories. The propriety of attorney listings in other online membership directories would depend upon the facts and circumstances involved and the application of the Ohio Code of Professional Responsibility. It is proper for an Ohio attorney to be listed in an online membership directory of a professional association with a link from the attorney’s name to the attorney’s e-mail address or law firm web site. A link from an attorney’s name in a membership directory on a professional organization’s web site to a listed attorney’s e-mail address or law firm web site does not constitute a referral triggering the application DR 2-103, unless there are facts indicating that there is compensation being provided for a referral or that the directory is being used as part of a lawyer referral service that screens inquiries and provides referrals. This advice is not to be construed as blanket approval of links between other types of web sites and an attorney’s web site or e-mail address. The propriety of other links between an attorney’s name in online membership directories and the attorney’s e- mail address and law firm web site would depend upon the facts and circumstances involved and the application of the Ohio Code of Professional Responsibility. It is proper for an Ohio attorney to be listed in an online membership directory of a professional association that either links its world wide web site to another related professional organization’s world wide web site or provides the membership directory to another related organization for
Op. 99-3 2 inclusion on its web site. This advice is not to be construed as blanket approval of all links of attorney membership directories between the world wide web sites of organizations or individuals. The propriety of other links would depend upon the facts and circumstances involved and the application of the Ohio Code of Professional Responsibility. OPINION: This opinion addresses questions regarding the listing of attorneys in online membership directories of a professional association. 1. Is it proper for an Ohio attorney to be listed in the online membership directory of a professional association? 2. Is it proper for an Ohio attorney to be listed in a membership directory of a professional association with a link from the attorney’s name to the attorney’s e-mail address and law firm home page? 3. Is it proper for an Ohio attorney to be listed in an online membership directory of a professional association that either links its world wide web site to another related professional organization’s world wide web site or provides the directory to another related organization for inclusion on its web site? Question One Is it proper for an Ohio attorney to be listed in the online membership directory of a professional association? The Ohio Code of Professional Responsibility permits Ohio lawyers and law firms to be listed in reputable law lists and law directories intended primarily for the use of the legal profession. DR 2-101(B)(2)(c) Nothing contained in this rule [DR 2-101] shall prohibit a lawyer or law firm from permitting inclusion in reputable law lists and law directories intended primarily for the use of the legal profession, of such information as has traditionally appeared in those publications. As set forth in the rule, the law list or law directory must be intended primarily for the use of the legal profession. A printed law directory of a
Op. 99-3 3 professional association traditionally has been viewed as intended primarily for the use of the legal profession even though it may also be available to the public upon request. An online law directory may be more readily accessible to the public through the association’s web site (unless access is blocked to those other than members), but it is still intended primarily for the use of the legal profession, particularly those within the association. Information listed in law lists and law directories should conform to the advertising rules. The Code offers examples of the type of information that is presumed to be informational. Information set forth in DR 2-101(D) would be acceptable for dissemination through law directory listings so long as the information is truthful as required under DR 2-101(A). DR 2-101(D) The following information with regard to lawyers, law firms, or members of firms will be presumed to be informational rather than solely promotional or self-laudatory, and acceptable for disseminated under these rules, if accurate and presented in a dignified manner: 1. Name or names of lawyer, law firm, and professional associates, together with their addresses and telephone numbers, with designations such as “Lawyer,” “Attorney,” “Law Firm.” 2. Field or fields of practice, limitations of practice, or areas of concentration, but only to the extent permitted by DR 2- 105; 3. Date and place of birth; 4. Dates and places of admission to the bar of the state and federal courts; 5. Schools attended, with dates of graduation and degrees conferred; 6. Legal teaching positions held at accredited law schools; 7. Authored publications;
Op. 99-3 4 8. Memberships in bar associations and other professional organizations; 9. Technical and professional licenses; 10. Military service; 11. Foreign language abilities; 12. Subject to DR 2-103, prepaid or group legal service programs in which the lawyer or firm participates; 13. Whether credit cards or other credit arrangements are accepted; 14. Office and telephone answering services hours. In conclusion, the Board advises that it is proper for an Ohio attorney to be listed in the online membership directory of a professional association. An online membership directory of attorneys in a professional association is considered a law directory intended primarily for the use of the legal profession and is permitted under DR 2-101(B)(2)(c) of the Ohio Code of Professional Responsibility. This advice is not to be construed as blanket approval of attorney listings in other types of online directories. The propriety of attorney listings in other online membership directories would depend upon the facts and circumstances involved and the application of the Ohio Code of Professional Responsibility. For a discussion of ethical issues regarding professional legal organizations on the Internet see Drew L. Kershen, Professional Legal Organizations on the Internet: Websites and Ethics (Oct. 1998) <htpp://www.legal ethics.com/articles/kershen.html>. The author addresses, inter alia, the ethical uncertainties as to compliance with the legal ethics codes of other states when attorneys are listed in online membership directories of professional associations. Question Two Is it proper for an Ohio attorney to be listed in a membership directory of a professional association with a link from the
Op. 99-3 5 attorney’s name to the attorney’s e-mail address and law firm home page? A characteristic of the world wide web is that links can be created from one web site to other web sites. “Links to other sites not only allow users to find the information they seek, but also lead them to more links that offer even more information.” Melinda M. Hanson, Lawyers, Firms Vie for Visibility By Creative Use of Home Pages on Web, Current Reports, (ABA/BNA) Vol 14, No. 9, at 239 (May 27, 1998). A link between a professional organization’s membership directory and a listed attorney’s home page or e-mail address provides a quick way to obtain information about an attorney and his or her law firm and allows quick access to e-mail communication with an attorney listed. Such links may be of interest to many law firms that have e-mail access, Internet access, and home pages. A 1998 survey by the Legal Technology Resource Center of the American Bar Association reports that 79.7% of responding small firms have e-mail and Internet access and that 98.7% of responding large firms have e-mail and Internet access. The survey also reports that 11.1% of responding small law firms have a home page on the world wide web and that 57.6% of responding large law firms have a home page on the world wide web. See American Bar Association, Legal Technology Resource Center, 1998 Small Firm Technology Survey, 1998 Large Firm Technology Survey. There is no rule within the Code directly addressing either attorney home pages on the world wide web or links between an attorney’s web site and other web sites. Until such rules are adopted, or in the absence of any specific rules ever being adopted, other rules in the Code of Professional Responsibility must be considered. DR 2-101(B)(1) lists as examples of acceptable advertising mediums “newspapers, periodicals, trade journals, ‘shoppers,’ and similar print media, outdoor advertising, radio and television, and written communication.” The rule predates widespread communication through the world wide web. Presumably, if communication through the world wide web had been considered when the rule was written it would have been included in this list. As to links between web sites, a pertinent concern is whether a link from a professional organization’s web site to an attorney’s home page or e-mail address would be considered a referral triggering the application of DR 2- 103, the rule regulating referrals and referral services. However, in this
Op. 99-3 6 Board’s view a link from a membership directory on a professional organization’s web site to a listed attorney’s law firm web site or e-mail address does not constitute a referral triggering the application DR 2-103, unless there are facts indicating that compensation is being provided for a referral or that the directory is being used as part of a lawyer referral service that screens inquiries and provides referrals. A membership directory of a professional organization of attorneys does not automatically constitute a referral service. A similar view has been expressed by an advisory committee in Massachusetts. “[T]he Rules of Professional Conduct permit a bar association to establish an Internet site on the World Wide Web that contains a publicly-accessible membership directory and ‘hot links’ to the home pages of individual members. A bar directory, whether written or computerized, does not constitute a ‘lawyer referral service’ for purposes of Rule 7.3(e) of the Massachusetts Rules of Professional Conduct.” Massachusetts Bar Ass’n, Op. 98-2 (1998). In conclusion, this Board advises that it is proper for an Ohio attorney to be listed in an online membership directory of a professional association with a link from the attorney’s name to the attorney’s e-mail address or law firm web site. A link from an attorney’s name in a membership directory on a professional organization’s web site to a listed attorney’s e-mail address or law firm web site does not constitute a referral triggering the application DR 2-103, unless there are facts indicating that there is compensation being provided for a referral or that the directory is being used as part of a lawyer referral service that screens inquiries and provides referrals. This advice is not to be construed as blanket approval of links between other types of web sites and an attorney’s web page or e-mail address. The propriety of other links between an attorney’s name in online membership directories and the attorney’s e-mail address and law firm web site would depend upon the facts and circumstances involved and the application of the Ohio Code of Professional Responsibility. Question Three Is it proper for an Ohio attorney to be listed in an online membership directory of a professional association that either links its world wide web site to another related professional organization’s world wide web site or provides the directory to another related organization for inclusion on its web site?
Op. 99-3 7 The Board finds no rule or reason within the Ohio Code of Professional Conduct that would prohibit an attorney from being listed in an online membership directory of a professional organization that shares its membership list with another professional organization. It is understandable that two professional organizations related in purpose or professional interest might want to share information through a link from one web site to the other site. Part of the information professional organizations might want to share would be their membership lists in order to facilitate communication between members of the two groups. Thus, the Board advises that it is proper for an Ohio attorney to be listed in an online membership directory of a professional association that either links its world wide web site to another related professional organization’s world wide web site or provides the membership directory to another related organization for inclusion on its web site. This advice is not to be construed as blanket approval of all links of attorney membership directories between the world wide sites of organizations or individuals. The propriety of other links would depend upon the facts and circumstances involved and the application of the Ohio Code of Professional Responsibility. Advisory Opinions of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline are informal, nonbinding opinions in response to prospective or hypothetical questions regarding the application of the Supreme Court Rules for the Government of the Bar of Ohio, the Supreme Court Rules for the Government of the Judiciary, the Code of Professional Responsibility, the Code of Judicial Conduct, and the Attorney’s Oath of Office.
Ti chiedi come si applica questo testo alla tua situazione?
Consulenza gratuita, senza impegno
Descrivi la tua situazione. Il nostro team ti ricontatterà via e-mail per la tua consulenza.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.