Ohio Board Advisory Opinion Op 98-005

The Supreme Court of Ohio
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ON GRIEVANCES AND DISCIPLINE
41 SOUTH HIGH STREET-SUITE 3370, COLUMBUS, OH 43215-6105
(614) 644-5800 FAX: (614) 644-5804
OFFICE OF SECRETARY
OPINION 98-5
Issued April 3, 1998
[CPR Opinion-provides advice under the Ohio Code of Professional Responsibility which is superseded
by the Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct, eff. 2/1/2007.]
SYLLABUS: A departing attorney may notify clients of his or her departure from a law
firm, identify his or her new location of practice, and indicate a willingness to provide
legal services at the new location. A law firm may notify clients of the departure of a
lawyer from the law firm and inform the clients of the law firm’s desire to provide
continued representation of the client. The notification may be made to the clients in
person or through an announcement card or letter. Such communication is permitted
under DR 2-102(A)(1) and (2) and DR 2-103(A). The departing lawyer and the law firm
should handle the departure professionally and ethically. Both the departing lawyer and
the law firm should be made aware of the planned departure before any announcement is
made to the client. The announcement to the client of the departure may be
communicated separately or jointly. The departing lawyer should not unfairly disparage
the law firm to the client. The law firm should not unfairly disparage the departing
lawyer to the client. The law firm should not withhold the departing lawyer’s
whereabouts from the client. Client files should neither be “raided” by the departing
lawyer nor “locked up” by the law firm for this can cause prejudice to the client. Client
files should remain with the law firm if that is the client’s choice. However, if the client
chooses the services of the departing attorney, the files should be handed over in a
professional and timely manner per the client’s instructions. Respect for a client’s choice
demonstrates to the client and to the public that the lawyer and law firm are truly
practicing a profession.
OPINION: The departure of a lawyer from a law firm can leave a lawyer and a law firm
at odds as to the continued representation of a client. The purpose of this opinion is to
provide departing lawyers and law firms with guidance as to the ethical requirements
under the Ohio Code of Professional Responsibility. Although departure of a lawyer
from a law firm can also create legal issues, those issues are outside the authority of this
advisory opinion.
Is it proper for a departing attorney to notify clients of his or her departure
from a law firm, identify his or her new location of practice, and indicate a
willingness to provide future legal services?
Is it proper for a law firm to notify clients of the departure of a lawyer
from the law firm and inform the clients of the law firm’s desire to provide
continued representation of the client?
Withdrawn by Adv.Op. 2020-06

Op. 98-5 2
Clients are not the property of a lawyer or law firm. Clients are individuals with choice
as to who will be their counsel. Although this may be difficult for some to hear or say, it
is true.
The client’s right to choose counsel is recognized in the Ohio Code of Professional
Responsibility. If a client discharges an attorney, the attorney must withdraw under DR
2-110(B)(4). A lawyer and a law firm may not under DR 2-108(A) participate in a
partnership or employment agreement that interferes with the client’s choice of counsel
by placing financial or geographical restrictions on a departing lawyer’s right to practice.
See Ohio SupCt, Bd of Comm’rs on Griev & Disc, Op. 91-3 (1991), Op. 90-14 (1990).
If the choice of counsel resides with a client, why do lawyers and law firms come to
loggerheads over clients when a lawyer departs? Both the law firm and the departing
lawyer value the client’s business. Both take pride in providing professional services to
the client. Both enjoy the resulting financial benefit. Thus, there are competing interests
and concerns.
A law firm may be concerned that the departing attorney will take files, improperly solicit
the client, and disparage the law firm, thus luring the client away from the firm. A
departing attorney may be concerned that the law firm will refuse to answer a client’s
inquiry as to the attorney’s new address or location or will refuse to hand over files if a
client wishes the services of the departing attorney at a new location.
When these concerns emerge as hostile allegations, the departing attorney and the law
firm begin the battle. It is a “client war.” Everyone loses. The profession is degraded.
The client suffers. The departing attorney and the law firm spend time and energy
unproductively and unprofessionally.
Often, the point of contention involves allegations regarding client communication. Who
communicated what to the client? When was it communicated? How was it
communicated? What effect did it have on the client’s choice of counsel? Were ethical
rules violated by such communications? Accusations are made. Feelings are hurt.
Professional relations between the attorneys and between the attorneys and the clients are
damaged.
Much has been written regarding the ethics of lawyer departure from a law firm. There
are journal articles and books. See e.g. Mark W. Bennett, Note, You Can Take It With
You: The Ethics of Lawyer Departure and Solicitation of Firm Clients, 10(2) Geo. J.
Legal Ethics 395 (1996); Robert W. Hillman, Law Firms and Their Partners: The Law
and Ethics of Grabbing and Leaving, 67 Texas L. Rev. 1 (1988). For a publication
devoted to the subject see Robert W. Hillman, Hillman on Lawyer Mobility (1997).
There are numerous advisory opinions permitting (sometimes with conditions) a
departing attorney to notify clients of the departure. See e.g., ABA, Informal Op. 1457
(1980); Alabama State Bar, Op. 91-06 (1991); State Bar of Arizona, Op. 91-17 (1991);
Bar Ass'n of Nassau County, Op. 93-40 (1993); North Carolina State Bar Ass’n, Op. 200
(1995); Oregon State Bar, Op. 1991-70 (1991). Several opinions express the view that a

Op. 98-5 3
departing attorney must communicate with clients regarding the change. See District of
Columbia Bar, Op. 273 (1997); Philadelphia Bar Ass’n, Op. 92-8 (undated); State Bar of
Wisconsin, Op. E-97-2 (1997).
In Ohio, what can be communicated and by whom? The Code does provide guidance.
Under DR 2-102(A), lawyers and law firms are permitted to announce new or changed
associations or addresses through professional announcement cards.
DR 2-102(A) A lawyer or law firm may use or participate in the use of
professional cards, professional announcement cards, office signs,
letterheads, or similar professional notices or devices, that are in dignified
form and comply with the following:
(1) A professional card of a lawyer identifying the lawyer by name and as
a lawyer and giving the lawyer’s addresses, telephone numbers, law
firm name, and any information permitted under DR 2-105. A
professional card of a law firm may also give the names of members
and associates and may be used for identification.
(2) A brief professional announcement card stating new or changed
associations or addresses, change of firm name, or similar matters
pertaining to the professional offices of a lawyer or law firm. It shall
not state the nature of the practice except as permitted under DR 2-
105.
In announcing the change, may a departing attorney indicate a willingness to provide
legal services at his or her new location? May a law firm indicate its desire to provide
continued representation of the client by lawyers in the firm? Again, the Code provides
guidance.
Under DR 2-103(A) a lawyer is prohibited from recommending oneself for employment
to a non-lawyer unless the non-lawyer has sought the lawyer’s advice.
DR 2-103(A) A lawyer shall not recommend employment, as a private
practitioner, of himself or herself, his or her partner, or associate to a non-
lawyer who has not sought the lawyer’s advice regarding employment of a
lawyer, except as provided in DR 2-101.
If an attorney is already providing legal services to a client, the client in essence has
sought the lawyer’s advice. Therefore, it would not be improper under the rule for the
attorney to acknowledge that he or she would be available to continue to provide legal
services at the new location. Similarly, it would not be improper for the law firm to
express its interest in continuing the representation by an attorney in the law firm.
In conclusion, the Board advises that a departing attorney may notify clients of his or her
departure from a law firm, identify his or her new location of practice, and indicate a
willingness to provide legal services at the new location. A law firm may notify clients of
the departure of a lawyer from the law firm and inform the clients of the law firm’s desire

Op. 98-5 4
to provide continued representation of the client. The notification may be made to the
clients in person or through an announcement card or letter. Such communication is
permitted under DR 2-102(A)(1) and (2) and DR 2-103(A). The departing lawyer and the
law firm should handle the departure professionally and ethically. Both the departing
lawyer and the law firm should be made aware of the planned departure before any
announcement is made to the client. The announcement to the client of the departure may
be communicated separately or jointly. The departing lawyer should not unfairly
disparage the law firm to the client. The law firm should not unfairly disparage the
departing lawyer to the client. The law firm should not withhold the departing lawyer’s
whereabouts from the client. Client files should neither be “raided” by the departing
lawyer nor “locked up” by the law firm for this can cause prejudice to the client. Client
files should remain with the law firm if that is the client’s choice. However, if the client
chooses the services of the departing attorney, the files should be handed over in a
professional and timely manner per the client’s instructions. Respect for a client’s choice
demonstrates to the client and to the public that the lawyer and law firm are truly
practicing a profession.
Advisory Opinions of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline are
informal, nonbinding opinions in response to prospective or hypothetical questions
regarding the application of the Supreme Court Rules for the Government of the
Bar of Ohio, the Supreme Court Rules for the Government of the Judiciary, the
Code of Professional Responsibility, the Code of Judicial Conduct, and the
Attorney’s Oath of Office.