Petitions for review, February 20, 2025

282
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
DENIED
February 20, 2025
Almanza-Garcia, Francisco v. Miller (A182843)(S071652)(337 Or App 103)
Department of Human Services v. D. B. (A184010)(S071559)(335 Or App 599)
Department of Human Services v. D. F. (A183993)(S071632)(336 Or App 263).
Bushong and Masih, JJ., would have allowed.
Department of Human Services v. F. K. (A183222)(S071572)(335 Or App 736)
Department of Human Services v. M. A. T. (A182963)(S071495)(335 Or App 294)
Department of Human Services v. M. G. (A184011)(S071610)(336 Or App 559)
Department of Human Services v. S. B. (A183699)(S071570)(335 Or App 800)
Evans, Michael Ray v. Fhuere (A180103)(S071431)(334 Or App 680)(petition and
supplemental pro se petition)
Ferguson Creek Investment, LLC v. Lane County (A184345)(S071486)(335 Or
App 277)
Fort Klamath Critical Habitat Landowners, Inc. v. Woodcock, in his official
capacity as the Oregon Water Resources Department director (A181385)
(S071372)(334 Or App 509)
Hayward v. High Performance Homes, Inc. (A179286)(S071458)(335 Or App 178).
Flynn, CJ., and DeHoog, J., concurred in denying review, but observed that
the petition raises an important legal issue that the court should consider in
an appropriate case.
Redwood Holdings, LLC v. Haney (A181376)(S071375)(333 Or App 666)
State v. Arthur, William Dean (A181293)(S071586)(336 Or App 130)
State v. Boehme, Rachael Lynn (A181439)(S071628)(336 Or App 359)
State v. Britt, Justin Charles (A178589)(S071456)(335 Or App 91). DeHoog, J.,
concurred but observed that the petition raised an important legal issue that
the court should consider in an appropriate case.
State v. Caoile, Mark Timmy (A179747)(S071412)(334 Or App 590)
State v. Conn, Dustan Allen (A180583/84)(S071622)(336 Or App 231)
State v. Farmer, Mark James (A177790)(S071349)(334 Or App 183)(petition and
supplemental pro se petition)
State v. Gutierrez, Mario Alberto (A182609)(S071691)(336 Or App 921)
State v. James, David (A179554)(S071589)(336 Or App 55)
State v. James, David (A179554)(S071589)(336 Or App 55)
State v. Kelley, Arthur Daniel (A176147)(S071442)(334 Or App 802)
State v. Luis-Hernandez, Modesto (A180282)(S071574)(335 Or App 790)
State v. Macias, Kyle Edgar (A180524)(S071588)(336 Or App 130)
State v. Martinez, Cristal Garcia (A179436)(S071462)(335 Or App 103)
State v. Minor-Osuna, Edgar (A179672)(S071461)(335 Or App 272)(petition and
supplemental pro se petition)
State v. R. L. E. (A181489)(S071569)(335 Or App 818)
State v. Sampson, Chelsea Lavinia Marie (A181806)(S071612)(336 Or App 359)
State v. Vincent, Shawn (A177705)(S071419)(334 Or App 714)
Tharp, Roderick Dolan v. Washburn (A174187)(S071438)(334 Or App 810)
Thorin Properties Limited Partnership v. City of Eugene (A180847)(S071411)(334
Or App 570). DeHoog and James, JJ., would have allowed.
Vazquez-Villagomez, Gerardo v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
(A181914)(S071533)(335 Or App 638)(petition and supplemental pro se
petition)