Petitions for review, June 18, 2020

568
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
(466 P3d 70-72, 74)
ALLOWED
June 18, 2020
State v. Carrier, Joseph Mark (A166588)(S066883)(on summary affirmance).
Petition for review allowed in part, limited to the issue of the appropriate
disposition of this case in light of Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US __, 140 S
Ct 1390, 206 L Ed 2d 583 (2020); petition for review otherwise denied. For
reasons given in State v. Ulery, 366 Or 500, 464 P3d 1123 (2020), the court
accepts the state’s concession that defendant’s Sixth Amendment challenge to
his conviction qualifies for plain error review, and it exercises its discretion
to correct the error. The court therefore reverses defendant’s conviction on
Counts 1, 2, and 3. Decision of Court of Appeals reversed, judgment of circuit
court reversed, and case remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings.
State v. Clark, Michael Robert (A165140)(S066922)(297 Or App 582). Petition for
review allowed in part, limited to the issue of the appropriate disposition of
this case in light of Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US __, 140 S Ct 1390, 206 L Ed 2d
583 (2020); petition for review otherwise denied. For reasons given in State v.
Ulery, 366 Or 500, 464 P3d 1123 (2020), the court accepts the state’s concession
that defendant’s Sixth Amendment challenge to his conviction qualifies for
plain error review, and it exercises its discretion to correct the error. The
court therefore reverses defendant’s conviction on Count 2. Decision of Court
of Appeals reversed, judgment of circuit court reversed, and case remanded to
the circuit court for further proceedings.
State v. Clyde, Nicholas Ryan (A164910)(A164918)(S066868)(298 Or App 142).
Petition for review allowed in part, limited to the issue of the appropriate
disposition of this case in light of Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US __, 140 S
Ct 1390, 206 L Ed 2d 583 (2020); petition for review otherwise denied. For
reasons given in State v. Ulery, 366 Or 500, 464 P3d 1123 (2020), the court
accepts the state’s concession that defendant’s Sixth Amendment challenges
to the receipt of the jury’s guilty verdicts on Counts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 and
entry of a judgment of conviction on Counts 1 and 2 in Douglas County case
no. 14CR1911FE qualify for plain error review, and it exercises its discretion
to correct the error. Decision of Court of Appeals reversed in part, judgment
of circuit court reversed in part, and case remanded to the circuit court for
further proceedings.
State v. Frystak, Steven J. (A165147)(S067529)(302 Or App 186). Petition for
review allowed in part, limited to the issue of the appropriate disposition of
this case in light of Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 US __, 140 S Ct 1390, 206 L
Ed 2d 583 (2020); petition for review otherwise denied. For reasons given in
State v. Ulery, 366 Or 500, 464 P3d 1123 (2020), the court accepts the state’s
concession that defendant’s Sixth Amendment challenge to his conviction
qualifies for plain error review, and it exercises its discretion to correct the
error. The court therefore reverses defendant’s conviction on Count 1. Decision
of Court of Appeals reversed in part, judgment of circuit court reversed, and
case remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings.

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW — Continued 	569
(466 P3d 70-74)
DENIED
June 18, 2020
Department of Human Services v. D. T. S. (A171913)(S067723)(302 Or App 186)
Drenth, David Henry v. Kelly (A168269)(S067610)(302 Or App 186)
Johnson, Martin Allen v. Premo (A160579)(S067598)(302 Or App 578)
State v. Brenner, Lanny Earl (A166929)(S067592)(302 Or App 187). Walters, C. J.,
and Duncan, J., would allow.
State v. Henthorne, Petey Ray (A166233)(S067613)(302 Or App 654)
State v. J. L. C. (A170558)(S067729)(302 Or App 381)
State v. Keyes, Nicholle Sherre (A166980)(S067564)(301 Or App 762)
State v. Marcott-St Louis, Sherri Lynn (A168167)(S067604)(302 Or App 381)
State v. Skjervem, Kristian Helmer (A168288)(S067668)(303 Or App 157)
State v. Toombs, Anthony Thomas (A166923)(S067599)(302 Or App 173)
Walter, Jared Weston v. State of Oregon (A169194)(S067631)(302 Or App 186)
DISMISSED
June 18, 2020
Johnson v. Doe (A168366)(S067636)(301 Or App 756)