Hines, C., Pet. v. Barrowclough, L. et al. - No. 127 MM 2026

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COLBY D. HINES, Petitioner v. LAURA BARROWCLOUGH; RICHARD HOWARD LOWE; JASMINE BLAKE; TYLER STREET; MARIA FRIES; HEATHER CONNELLY; VICTOR E. FOSHI, JR.; SANDY V. CARR, Respondents : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 127 MM 2026 ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 8th day of October, 2026, the “Petition for Review” and the “Application for Immediate/Emergency Relief” are DENIED. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption. It is further NOTED that the instant action was commenced prior to the issuance of this Court’s June 29, 2026 order in another pro se matter advanced by Petitioner Colby D. Hines relative to the underlying child-support action. See Hines v. Delaware County Domestic Relations Section, 109 MM 2026 (per curiam order dated June 29, 2026) (announcing that “Petitioner is PROHIBITED from advancing to this Court any pro se, Miscellaneous Docket filings relative to the underlying support action”).

-- 1 of 1 --