State v. Dominic Derricotte

CourtListener 10153364Scctapp3 feb 2010

Testo completo

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Dominic M. Derricotte, Appellant.

Appeal From Charleston County

Deadra L. Jefferson, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-086

Submitted January 4, 2010 – Filed February
3, 2010   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Senior Appellate Defender Joseph L.
Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Donald J. Zelenka, all of Columbia; Solicitor Scarlett Anne Wilson, of
Charleston, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Dominic
Derricotte appeals his concurrent sentences of life imprisonment and thirty
years for murder and armed robbery, respectively.  Derricotte's contends the
trial court erred by allowing two of the State's witnesses to testify that the
victim described him as creepy.  After a thorough review of the record, and counsel's brief, 
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS,
and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.