In The Interest of Thomas H.

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

In The Interest of Thomas H., A Minor Under The Age of
Seventeen, Appellant.

Appeal From Lancaster County

 Roger E. Henderson, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-248

Submitted April 1, 2010 – Filed April 21,
2010

affirmed

Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and
Senior Assistant Attorney General Norman Mark Rapoport, all of Columbia; and Solicitor
Douglas A. Barfield, Jr., of Lancaster, for Respondent.

PER
CURIAM: Thomas H. appeals his commitment to the Department of
Juvenile Justice for an indeterminate period, not to exceed his twenty-first
birthday, for violating his probation for truancy and pleading guilty to
assault of a high and aggravated nature.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Shumate, 276 S.C. 46, 46-47, 275 S.E.2d 288,
288 (1981) (finding a defendant is precluded from challenging the
authority of the trial court to revoke his probationary sentence, previously
imposed and admittedly violated, by failing to object to or seek modification
of the revocation sentence in the trial court); In re Arisha K.S., 331
S.C. 288, 296, 501 S.E.2d 128, 133 (Ct. App. 1998) (noting juvenile defendants
must contemporaneously object to the voluntariness of a guilty plea in order to
preserve the issue on appeal). 

Affirmed.

PIEPER
and GEATHERS, JJ., and CURETON, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.