In the Interest of Dustin D.

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

In the Interest
of Dustin D., A minor under
the age of seventeen, Appellant.

Appeal From Lexington County

Leslie K. Riddle, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-546

Submitted November 2, 2009 – Filed
November 20, 2009   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
and Larry L. Vanderbilt, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Dustin D. appeals his probation revocation and
resulting commitment to the Department of Juvenile Justice for an indeterminate
period of time not to exceed his twenty-first birthday.  Dustin D. argues the
probation revocation hearing was so summary that the record is insufficient for
review.    After a thorough
review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED. 

SHORT,
THOMAS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.