MOHAWK INDUSTRIES, INC. v. WILLIAMS et al.

547US2 Unit: $U62 [11-18-07 15:34:42] PAGES PGT: OPIN
516 OCTOBER TERM, 2005
Per Curiam
MOHAWK INDUSTRIES, INC. v. WILLIAMS et al.
certiorari to the united states court of appeals for
the eleventh circuit
No. 05–465. Argued April 26, 2006—Decided June 5, 2006
Certiorari limited to Question 1 dismissed; certiorari granted; 411 F. 3d
1252, vacated and remanded.
Carter G. Phillips argued the cause for petitioner. With
him on the briefs were Richard D. Bernstein, Juan P.
Morillo, and Steven T. Cottreau.
Howard W. Foster argued the cause for respondents.
With him on the brief were John E. Floyd, Joshua F. Thorpe,
Ronan P. Doherty, Bobby Lee Cook, and Matthew Thames.
Malcolm L. Stewart argued the cause for the United
States as amicus curiae urging affirmance. With him on
the brief were Solicitor General Clement, Assistant Attor
ney General Fisher, Deputy Solicitor General Dreeben, and
Sangita K. Rao.*
Per Curiam.
The writ of certiorari limited to Question 1 presented by
the petition, granted at 546 U. S. 1075 (2005), is dismissed as
improvidently granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari
is granted. The judgment is vacated, and the case is re
manded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Elev
*Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed for the Chamber of
Commerce of the United States of America et al. by Beth S. Brinkmann,
Seth M. Galanter, Alison Tucher, Robin S. Conrad, and Amar D. Sarwal;
and for the National Association of Manufacturers et al. by Michael J.
Mueller, Jan S. Amundson, and Quentin Riegel.
Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed for the Immigration
Political Action Committee et al. by Barnaby W. Zall; and for the National
Association of Shareholder and Consumer Attorneys by Kevin P. Roddy
and G. Robert Blakey.

547US2 Unit: $U62 [11-18-07 15:34:42] PAGES PGT: OPIN
517 Cite as: 547 U. S. 516 (2006)
Per Curiam
enth Circuit for further consideration in light of Anza v.
Ideal Steel Supply Corp., ante, p. 451.
It is so ordered.