CourtListener 9474192•Global Energy Enterprises Inc. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Global Energy Enterprises Inc. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
CourtListener 9474192Txctapp148 feb 2024
Testo completo
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 8, 2024.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-23-00732-CV
GLOBAL ENERGY ENTERPRISES INC., Appellant
V.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee
On Appeal from the 125th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2021-18748
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an attempted appeal from a judgment signed January 31, 2022. On
February 10, 2022, appellant filed a post-judgment motion to vacate, set aside,
cancel the judgment, and reopen the case. Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed
October 04, 2023. The notice of appeal must be filed within 90 days after the
judgment is signed if any party timely files post-judgment motion. See Tex. R.
App. P. 26.1.
Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed timely. A motion to extend time is
necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal
beyond the time allowed by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1, but within
the 15-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion to extend time.
See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617–18 (1997) (construing predecessor
to Rule 26). Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed within the 15-day period
provided by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3.
On December 6, 2023, notification was transmitted to all parties the appeal
was subject to dismissal without further notice for want of subject-matter
jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). On December 27, 2023, appellant’s chief
executive officer responded to the dismissal letter. However, the response is not
sufficient to establish how this court has jurisdiction1.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of subject-matter jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justice Bourliot, Zimmerer, and Spain.
1
In addition, the response was not filed by a lawyer. See Kunstoplast of Am., Inc. v.
Formosa Plastics Corp., USA., 937 S.W.2d 455, 456 (Tex. 1996) (“Generally a corporation may
be represented only by a licensed attorney.”).
2
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.