CourtListener 10659598•In Re AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP v. the State of Texas
In Re AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP v. the State of Texas
CourtListener 10659598Txctapp1518 ago 2025
Testo completo
ACCEPTED
15-25-00088-CV
FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
AUSTIN, TEXAS
8/18/2025 3:30 PM
No. 15-25-00088-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
CLERK
FILED IN
15th COURT OF APPEALS
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
FOR THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM
AUSTIN, TEXAS CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Clerk
IN RE: ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
Relator
Original Proceeding from the 71st Judicial District Court
in Harrison County, Texas
The Honorable Brad Morin, Presiding
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY IN FURTHER RESPONSE TO PETITION
FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Samuel F. Baxter Mark Lanier
Jennifer L. Truelove Zeke DeRose
McKool Smith, P.C. Jonathan Wilkerson
104 East Houston, Suite 300 THE LANIER FIRM
Marshall, Texas 75670 10940 W. Sam Houston Pkwy N, Suite 100
(903) 923-9000 Houston, TX 77064
Fax: (903) 923-9099 (800) 723-3216
Fax: (713) 659-2204
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Real-Parties-
in-Interest SCEF, LLC and Lynne Levin-
Guzman
Real-Parties-in-Interest (“Plaintiffs”) respectfully request leave to file a
short surreply in further response to Relator AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP’s
(“Astra”) petition for writ of mandamus. The proposed surreply is attached hereto
as Exhibit A.
In support of their motion, Plaintiffs state as follows:
• Prior to filing their response to Astra’s mandamus petition, Plaintiffs
amended their pleadings to add voluminous facts supporting venue in
Harrison County.
• In their response to Astra’s mandamus petition, Plaintiffs explained that
(i) under Rule 65 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, the filing of
the amended petition moots Astra’s mandamus petition; (ii) Astra’s 20-
month delay in seeking mandamus triggers laches; and (iii) Astra’s
petition fails because the record before the Court is different from that
at issue in In re Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, 711 S.W.3d 732 (Tex. App.—
15th Dist. 2025, orig. proceeding), including because Astra waived
certain arguments.
• In its reply in support of its mandamus petition, Astra (i) argues that
this Court may not look to the operative pleading to resolve Astra’s
mandamus challenge; (ii) laches does not apply; and (iii) Sanofi is “on
all fours” with this case and waiver does not apply.
1
Plaintiffs did not have an adequate opportunity to respond to Astra’s reply
arguments and thus this Court does not have the benefit of Plaintiffs’ views on these
questions. Plaintiffs respectfully seek leave to file the attached, eight-page surreply.
Plaintiffs sought Astra’s consent to this motion for leave. Astra advised that it
takes no position on the matter.
2
Dated: August 18, 2025 Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Sam Baxter /s/ Mark Lanier
Samuel F. Baxter (co-lead Mark Lanier (co-lead counsel)
counsel) Zeke DeRose
sbaxter@mckoolsmith.com Jonathan Wilkerson
Jennifer L. Truelove THE LANIER FIRM
jtruelove@mckoolsmith.com 10940 W. Sam Houston Pkwy N
MCKOOL SMITH P.C. Houston, TX 77064
104 East Houston, Suite 300 (800) 723-3216
Marshall, Texas 75670 Fax: (713) 659-2204
(903) 923-9000
Fax: (903) 923-9099
ATTORNEYS FOR
PLAINTIFF/REAL-PARTY-IN-
INTEREST HEALTH SELECTION
GROUP, LLC
3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and
foregoing document has been served on August 18, 2025 to counsel of record.
/s/ Samuel F. Baxter
Samuel F. Baxter
4
Automated Certificate of eService
This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system.
The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system
on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing
certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a
certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules.
Envelope ID: 104513977
Filing Code Description: Motion
Filing Description: MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY IN
FURTHER RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Status as of 8/18/2025 3:36 PM CST
Case Contacts
Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status
Kennon L.Wooten kwooten@scottdoug.com 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
Angela Goldberg agoldberg@scottdoug.com 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
Jonathan Wilkerson 24050162 jonathan.wilkerson@lanierlawfirm.com 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
Melissa Smith 24001351 melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
William Peterson 24065901 willpete@gmail.com 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
Samuel Baxter 1938000 sbaxter@mckoolsmith.com 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
Brian McBride 24002554 scott.mcbride@morganlewis.com 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
Zeke DeRose 24057421 zeke.derose@lanierlawfirm.com 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
Jennifer Truelove 24012906 jtruelove@mckoolsmith.com 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
Alex Brown 24026964 alex.brown@lanierlawfirm.com 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
Lynne Kurtz-Citrin 24081425 lynne.kurtz-citrin@oag.texas.gov 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
Jonathan Bonilla 24073939 Jonathan.Bonilla@hhs.texas.gov 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
W. Mark Lanier 11934600 jrm@lanierlawfirm.com 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
Heidi Rasmussen 24090345 heidi.rasmussen@morganlewis.com 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
Nadia Burns 24041176 nadia.burns@oag.texas.gov 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
Ruth Adams radams@scottdoug.com 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
Paige Cheung 24116193 paige.cheung@oag.texas.gov 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
Steve McConnico smcconnico@scottdoug.com 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
Jordan Kadjar jkadjar@scottdoug.com 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
John Dodds john.dodds@morganlewis.com 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
Erica Jaffe erica.jaffe@morganlewis.com 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
W. Mark Lanier WML@LanierLawFirm.com 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
Automated Certificate of eService
This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system.
The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system
on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing
certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a
certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules.
Envelope ID: 104513977
Filing Code Description: Motion
Filing Description: MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY IN
FURTHER RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Status as of 8/18/2025 3:36 PM CST
Case Contacts
W. Mark Lanier WML@LanierLawFirm.com 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
Vivian Egbu vivian.egbu@oag.texas.gov 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
Lauren Sibley lauren.sibley@oag.texas.gov 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
Steven Strauss steven.strauss@morganlewis.com 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
joel leach jleach@mckoolsmith.com 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
denise lopez dlopez@mckoolsmith.com 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
Cynthia Lu cynthia.lu@oag.texas.gov 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM ERROR
Angel Devine adevine@mckoolsmith.com 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
Radu Lelutiu rlelutiu@mckoolsmith.com 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
Ryan McCarthy ryan.mccarthy@morganlewis.com 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
Bradie Williams bradie.williams@morganlewis.com 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
Joshua Morrow josh@lkcfirm.com 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
Scott Keller scott@lkcfirm.com 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
Andrew Davis andrew@lkcfirm.com 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
Cathy Hodges catherine.hodges@aporter.com 8/18/2025 3:30:28 PM SENT
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.