Daniel H. Rose v. Marten Transport, Ltd. and Praetorian Insurance Company

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: Judges Alston, Decker and Senior Judge Coleman
DANIEL H. ROSE
MEMORANDUM OPINION*
v. 	Record No. 1999-13-2 	PER CURIAM
FEBRUARY 4, 2014
MARTEN TRANSPORT, LTD. AND
PRAETORIAN INSURANCE COMPANY
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
(Stephen T. Harper; Reinhardt/Harper/Davis, PLC , on brief), for
appellant.
(S. Vernon Priddy III; Michael L. Goff, Jr.; Two Rivers Law Group,
P.C., on brief), for appellees.
Daniel H. Rose appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding
Rose did not suffer a compensable injury by accident. Rose argues the commission erred in
holding the accident was not compensable because it was not an actual risk that arose out of his
employment with Marten Transport, Ltd.
We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is
without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final
opinion. See Rose v. Marten Transport, Ltd., JCN VA02000009391 (Oct. 7, 2013). We
dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
Affirmed.
* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
UNPUBLISHED