Richard L. Bailey v. Truland Systems Corporation and Hartford Casualty Insurance Company

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: 	Judges Frank, McClanahan and Senior Judge Willis
RICHARD L. BAILEY
MEMORANDUM OPINION*
v. 	Record No. 2402-08-4 	PER CURIAM
FEBRUARY 3, 2009
TRULAND SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND
HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
(Julie H. Heiden; Koonz, McKenney, Johnson, DePaolis &
Lightfoot, L.L.P., on brief), for appellant.
(John T. Cornett, Jr.; Daniel E. Lynch & Associates, on brief), for
appellees.
Richard L. Bailey (claimant) appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation
Commission finding that he failed to prove he was totally disabled from July 9, 2004 through
November 7, 2004, due to his compensable injury by accident.1 We have reviewed the record
and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Bailey v. Truland Systems
Corp., VWC File No. 217-10-25 (Sept. 3, 2008). We dispense with oral argument and
summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
1 Claimant does not challenge the commission’s finding that even if claimant proved he
was partially disabled, he failed to prove he adequately marketed his residual work capacity
during the period in question. Therefore, that finding is binding and conclusive upon us.

- 2 -
materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code
§ 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
Affirmed.