Micheal R. Lane, Sr. v. Virginia Employment Commission and Van Go, Inc. of Richmond Corporation

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: 	Judges Elder, Clements and Senior Judge Annunziata
MICHEAL R. LANE, SR.
MEMORANDUM OPINION*
v. 	Record No. 1809-07-2 	PER CURIAM
JANUARY 15, 2008
VIRGINIA EMPLOYMENT COMMISSION AND
VAN GO, INC. OF RICHMOND CORPORATION
FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
Melvin R. Hughes, Jr., Judge
(Martin Wegbreit; Central Virginia Legal Aid Society, on briefs), for
appellant.
(Robert F. McDonnell, Attorney General; Elizabeth B. Peay,
Assistant Attorney General; Thomas W. Nesbitt, Assistant Attorney
General, on brief), for appellee Virginia Employment Commission.
No brief for appellee Van Go, Inc. of Richmond Corporation.
Micheal R. Lane, Sr. appeals a decision of the circuit court denying his claim for
unemployment benefits. The circuit court affirmed the ruling of the Virginia Employment
Commission finding that Lane was terminated from his employment with Van Go, Inc. of
Richmond Corporation due to work-related misconduct under Code § 60.2-618(2). We have
reviewed the record and the circuit court’s June 1, 2007 opinion letter and find that this appeal is
without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the circuit court in its June 1,
2007 opinion letter and its July 10, 2007 final order. See Lane v. Virginia Employment
Comm’n, Case No. 760CL06006617-00-01 (June 1, 2007 and July 10, 2007). We dispense with
* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.

- 2 -
oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
See Code
§ 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
Affirmed.