State Of Washington, Respondent V. Justin E.critchell, Appellant

-'0'^ i [;
•S'l^TF P^ 1£-<'' C''"V",'r. '•'•'
2011. APR-7 	AH 9: 52
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF WASHINGTON,
Respondent,
v.
JUSTIN ERIN CRITCHELL,
Appellant.
No. 69247-0-
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
APR - 	7 2014FILED:
Per Curiam — Justin Critchell appeals his convictions for third and fourth degree
assault, arguing that the trial court erred in instructing the jury that it had a "duty to
return a verdict of guilty" if it found all the elements of each offense beyond a
reasonable doubt. 	This argument is controlled by our decision in State v. Ryan P.
Moore, No. 69766-8 (Wash. February 18, 2014) and the cases cited therein.
Affirmed.
FOR THE COURT:
OeckeJ^
<4xX