State Of Washington, Respondent / X-app. V. Mohamed D. Dukuly, Appellant / X-res

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

ANTE pipfl oo}

te

ZOIENOY 19 AN @: 42
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

STATE OF WASHINGTON, )
) No. 77295-3-|
Respondent, )
} DIVISION ONE
Vv. )
)
MOHAMED D. DUKULY, ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION
) . f, +
Appellant. ) FILED: NOY 19°28

PER CurRIAM. Mohamed Dukuly appeals his conviction for first degree
robbery, arguing that a statute (RCW 13.04.030) requiring his prosecution in
adult court violates procedural and substantive due process. The same
arguments were recently rejected in, and are controlled by, the Washington State

Supreme Court's decision in State v. Watkins, oWn.2d_ , 423 P.3d 830, 832

(2018).
Affirmed.

For the Court: