us-cbp-cross-rulings-hq-084334•HQ 084334: Classification of certain sequined women's garments
HQ 084334: Classification of certain sequined women's garments
us-cbp-cross-rulings-hq-084334HQ 084334: Classification of certain sequined women's garmentsGuidance
Native CBP ruling rendition. Applicability is fact-specific; modification/revocation relationships and original publisher date are retained. Publisher sentinel year0001 means unknown date, not a historical legal adoption.
HQ 084334
August 23, 1989
CLA-2 CO:R:C:G 084334 CMR
CATEGORY: Classification
TARIFF NO.: 6104.31.0000
Peter Klestadt, Esq.
Grunfeld, Desiderio, Lebowitz & Silverman
12 East 49th Street
New York, New York 10017
RE: Classification of certain sequined women's garments
Dear Mr. Klestadt:
This ruling is in response to your letter of April 19, 1989, on
behalf of Adrienne Vittadini, Inc., requesting the classification of
certain sequined women's garments.
FACTS:
The garments at issue, styles R15033, R13034, R15034 and R15235,
are made of 100 percent wool knit fabric. Each style has sequins and
beading sewn onto the garment forming a decorative pattern. The
garments have long sleeves, round necklines without collars, and full
frontal openings. Style R13034 has button closures. Style R15034
has hidden hook and eye closures. Styles R15033 and R15235 have
hidden snap closures. All four styles are tailored; none are lined.
The garments will be manufactured in Hong Kong and imported
through New York.
ISSUE:
Are the garments classifiable as shirts, tops or jackets?
Are the garments classifiable as textile wearing apparel or as
wearing apparel of plastics?
-2-
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
The determination of whether these garments are blouses or
jackets is based on the styling and construction of the garments and
the manner in which we believe they will be principally used. See,
United States v. Bruce Duncan Co., 50 CCPA 43, 46, C.A.D. 817 (1963).
These garments are excessively ornamented with embroidery and
beading. This alone is not decisive; however, the effect of this
excessive ornamentation is. The garments are very heavy and are not
lined. Normally, lining is a feature found in jackets, not shirts or
tops. In this case, however, the lack of lining and the weight of
the garments are the features which lead us to believe these garments
will be principally used as jackets and not as shirts or tops.
We do not believe a woman would wear any of these garments next
to her skin with nothing more than the usual undergarments. The
extensive stitching on the inside of the garments makes them
uncomfortable for wear next to the skin.
The overall impression of these garments is that they are
jackets and we believe they will be worn as such.
The issue of whether these garments are classifiable as textile
wearing apparel or as wearing apparel of plastics arises due to the
extensive beading and applique work present on them. The Explanatory
Notes, which are the official interpretation of the HTSUS at the
international level, state in the general notes to chapter 61 that
the classification of goods in the chapter "is not affected by the
presence of parts or accessories of, for example, . . ., plastics or
metal. Where, however, the presence of these materials constitutes
more than mere trimming the articles are classified in accordance
with the relative Chapter Notes . . ., or failing that, according to
the General Interpretative Rules."
With the exception of perhaps style R15034, we cannot dismiss
the beading and applique work on these garments as mere trimming.
Therefore, we must look to the chapter notes, and if necessary, the
General Rules of Interpretation (GRIs).
Prima facie, taking the beading and applique work into
consideration, it would appear the garments could be classified under
two headings--heading 3926, which provides for other articles of
plastics and articles of other materials of headings 3901 to 3914;
and heading 6104, which provides for women's suit-type jackets and
blazers, among other things. Examining the chapter notes for chapter
39 and chapter 61, we find that Note 2(l) of chapter 39 excludes from
classification within that chapter "goods of section XI (textile and
textile articles)."
-3-
The garments before us are knit textile jackets with varying
amounts of beading and applique work. In chapter 61, we find an eo
nomine provision for women's and girls' knitted or crocheted suit-
type jackets and blazers. The existence of this eo nomine provision
compels us to view the garments before us as "goods of section XI"
and, therefore, excluded from classification in chapter 39 by
application of Note 2(l). Note 2(l) requires classification
"otherwise" than by application of GRI 3(b).
HOLDING:
The submitted garments, styles R15033, R13034, R15034 and
R15235, are classifiable as wool jackets in subheading 6104.31.0000,
HTSUSA, textile category 435, dutiable at 68.3 cents per kilogram
plus 20 percent ad valorem.
Due to the changeable nature of the statistical annotation (the
ninth and tenth digits of the classification) and the restraint
(quota/visa) categories, you should contact your local Customs office
prior to importation of this merchandise to determine the current
status of any import restraints or requirements.
Sincerely,
John Durant, Director
Commercial Rulings Division
6cc: Area Director, New York Seaport
1cc: CITA
1cc: Legal Reference Section
1cc: Phil Robins
Ti chiedi come si applica questo testo alla tua situazione?
Consulenza gratuita, senza impegno
Descrivi la tua situazione. Il nostro team ti ricontatterà via e-mail per la tua consulenza.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.