HQ 951100: Espadrilles;

Native CBP ruling rendition. Applicability is fact-specific; modification/revocation relationships and original publisher date are retained. Publisher sentinel year0001 means unknown date, not a historical legal adoption.

                            HQ 951100

                           April 8, 1992

CLA-2  CO:R:C:M  DFC

CATEGORY:  Classification

TARIFF NO.:  6404.19.25;  6404.19.30

Ms. Jill Peterson
Sam & Libby
1123 Industrial Road
San Carlos, California  94070

RE:  Espadrilles;

Dear Ms. Peterson:

     In a letter dated November 15, 1991, you inquired as to the
tariff classification under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States (HTSUS) of three espadrilles produced in Spain.
Samples were submitted for examination.

FACTS:

     The samples are three ladies' size B, slip-on espadrilles,
styles "U can have him," "Got to have him," and "Goosebumps."
All the samples have soles of rubber/plastics and jute in which
the jute fibers have been covered with a thin, transparent,
rubber/plastics type material.  The upper of style "Goosebumps"
has an external surface area of rayon.  The upper of style "Got
to have him" has an external surface area of cotton and man-made
fibers with cotton predominating.  It is assumed for the purpose
of this reply that the upper of style "U can have him" has an
external surface area of cotton.

     You maintain that these espadrilles are properly
classifiable under subheading 6404.19.25, HTSUS, as footwear
with outer soles of rubber, plastics, leather or composition
leather and uppers of textile materials, other, footwear of the
slip-on type, that is held to the foot without the use of laces
or buckles or other fasteners, less than 10 percent by weight of
rubber or plastics, with uppers of vegetable fibers.

ISSUE:

     Should the thin plastic coating on the jute portion of the
outer sole, which is not visible to the naked eye, be removed
from the jute and its weight added to the rubber/plastics weight
for purposes of determining whether the shoe is less than 10
percent by weight of rubber/plastics?



                               -2-

LAW AND ANALYSIS:

     Classification of goods under the HTSUS is governed by the
General rules of Interpretation (GRI's).  GRI 1 provides that
"classification shall be determined according to the terms of the
headings and any relative section or chapter notes, and, provided
such headings or notes do not otherwise require, according to
[the remaining GRI's taken in order]."  In other words,
classification is governed first by the terms of the headings of
the tariff and any relative section or chapter notes.

     Note 3 to Chapter 64, HTSUS, provides that "[f]or the
purposes of this chapter, the expression 'rubber or plastics'
includes any textile material visibly coated (or covered)
externally with one or both of those materials."

     The Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System
Explanatory Notes (EN) to the HTSUS, although not dispositive
should be looked to for the proper interpretation of the HTSUS.
See 54 FR 35128(August 23, 1989).  EN (E) to Chapter 64 which is
relevant here reads as follows:

     (E)  It should be noted that for the purposes of this
          Chapter, the expression "rubber or plastics" includes
          any textile material visibly coated or covered
          externally with one or both of those materials, which
          means that the coating or covering can be seen with the
          naked eye with no account being taken of any resulting
          change of colour.

      The jute, in the areas where the relatively thick (about
1/16 inch) rubber outer sole has been cut out, is covered with an
extremely thin coating of rubber/plastics.  It is our observation
that the plastic coating on the jute is not visible to the naked
eye.

     Since "rubber or plastics" includes any textile material
visibly coated (or covered) externally with one or both of these
materials, it is reasonable to ignore rubber/plastic coatings on
textiles which are not visible to the naked eye for external
surface determinations and for weight breakdown purposes.
Further, it is our position that textile layers which are visibly
coated with rubber/plastics should be included with the
rubber/plastics layer in weight breakdowns.



                               -3-

     Laboratory analyses were conducted on samples of all styles
involved.  In performing these analyses the weights of the thin,
transparent, rubber/plastic coating were attributed to the
textile components of the footwear.  The analysis of the sample
representing style "You can have him" revealed that
rubber/plastics constitutes 9.9%  by weight of this style.  The
analysis of the sample representing style "Got to have him,"
revealed that rubber/plastics constitutes 6.9% by weight of this
style.  Consequently, the samples of these styles are
classifiable under subheading 6404.19.25, HTSUS, as footwear
with outer soles of rubber, plastics, leather or composition
leather and uppers of textile materials, other, footwear of the
slip-on type, that is held to the foot without the use of laces
or buckles or other fasteners, less than 10 percent by weight of
rubber or plastics, with uppers of vegetable fibers.

     The laboratory analysis of the sample representing style
"Goosebumps" revealed that rubber/plastics constitutes 9.5% by
weight of the shoe.  Consequently, the sample of this style with
a rayon upper is classifiable under subheading 6404.19.30, HTSUS,
as footwear with outer soles of rubber, plastics, leather or
composition leather and uppers of textile materials, other,
footwear of the slip-on type, that is held to the foot without
the use of laces or buckles or other fasteners, less than 10% by
weight of rubber or plastics, other.

     It is suggested that Customs officers at the ports of entry
obtain samples from shipments of these types of shoes for weight
analysis because variances in weight occur in normal
manufacturing which could result in different classifications.

HOLDING:

     Styles "U can have him" and "Got to have him" are dutiable
at the rate of 7.5% ad valorem under subheading 6404.19.25,
HTSUS.

     Style "Goosebumps" is dutiable at the rate of 12.5% ad
valorem under subheading 6404.19.30, HTSUS.


                                   Sincerely,


                                   John Durant, Director
                                   Commercial Rulings Division






6cc AD NY Seaport
1cc J. Sheridan New York
1cc John Durant
1cc NY laboratory S. Sheridan
1cc SF laboratory D. Irvine