us-cbp-cross-rulings-hq-951271•HQ 951271: Modification of DD 871186; women's wool garments, subheading 6110.10.2080, HTSUSA; correction in style number
HQ 951271: Modification of DD 871186; women's wool garments, subheading 6110.10.2080, HTSUSA; correction in style number
us-cbp-cross-rulings-hq-951271HQ 951271: Modification of DD 871186; women's wool garments, subheading 6110.10.2080, HTSUSA; correction in style numberGuidance
Native CBP ruling rendition. Applicability is fact-specific; modification/revocation relationships and original publisher date are retained. Publisher sentinel year0001 means unknown date, not a historical legal adoption.
HQ 951271
April 3, 1992
CLA-2 CO:R:C:T 951271 jb
CATEGORY: Classification
Carol Shelsy
MAST Industries, Inc.
P.O. Box 9020
Andover, MA 01810
RE: Modification of DD 871186; women's wool garments, subheading
6110.10.2080, HTSUSA; correction in style number
Dear Ms. Shelsy:
On February 20, 1992, binding ruling DD 871186 was issued to
you, classifying two garments. The first garment, a women's 100
percent wool knitted garment, is described as a blouse, with less
than 10 stitches per centimeter in a horizontal direction, and
featuring long sleeves, a full frontal opening closed with six
buttons and a straight bottom approximately hip length. The
second garment, also a 100% wool knitted garment, is similar to
the former, except that it has no opening. Both styles have more
than nine stitches per two centimeters measured in a horizontal
direction. Both garments were classified under subheading
6116.10.2080, HTSUSA.
You subsequently brought to our attention, in a letter dated
March 4, 1992, that you inadvertently transposed one of the style
numbers in that ruling request and consequently, the ruling was
issued with the incorrect style number. You now request that DD
871186 be revised to properly reflect the correct style number
for that garment.
The merchandise at issue is one of the styles ruled upon in
DD 871186, Style #XK9674W. Based on your assertions, which you
substantiate with a copy of your original classification request
in the form of a computer generated specification sheet, what was
submitted as Style #XK9674W should have actually been indicated
as Style #XK9764W.
Based on the foregoing, we can determine that what was
originally submitted as Style #XK9674W, was done so in error, and
that the correct style number is Style #XK9764W.
In order to assure uniformity in Customs classification of
this merchandise and eliminate uncertainty, this notice to you
should be considered a modification of DD 871186 under 19 CFR
177.9(d)(1) (1989), effective with the date of this letter.
Sincerely,
John Durant, Director
Ti chiedi come si applica questo testo alla tua situazione?
Consulenza gratuita, senza impegno
Descrivi la tua situazione. Il nostro team ti ricontatterà via e-mail per la tua consulenza.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.