us-cbp-cross-rulings-hq-951763•HQ 951763: Reconsideration of Pre-entry Classification Ruling, PC 868360 of 11/26/91; Classification of a women's upper body garment; tank top v. similar to a tank top; 6109.10.0065, HTSUSA, v. 6109.10.0070, HTSUSA
HQ 951763: Reconsideration of Pre-entry Classification Ruling, PC 868360 of 11/26/91; Classification of a women's upper body garment; tank top v. similar to a tank top; 6109.10.0065, HTSUSA, v. 6109.10.0070, HTSUSA
us-cbp-cross-rulings-hq-951763HQ 951763: Reconsideration of Pre-entry Classification Ruling, PC 868360 of 11/26/91; Classification of a women's upper body garment; tank top v. similar to a tank top; 6109.10.0065, HTSUSA, v. 6109.10.0070, HTSUSAGuidance
Native CBP ruling rendition. Applicability is fact-specific; modification/revocation relationships and original publisher date are retained. Publisher sentinel year0001 means unknown date, not a historical legal adoption.
HQ 951763
July 30, 1992
CLA-2 CO:R:C:T 951763 CMR
CATEGORY: Classification
TARIFF NO: 6109.10.0060
Gail Cumins, Esq.
Sharretts, Paley, Carter & Blauvelt, P.C.
Sixty-seven Broad Street
New York, New York 10004
RE: Reconsideration of Pre-entry Classification Ruling, PC 868360
of 11/26/91; Classification of a women's upper body garment;
tank top v. similar to a tank top; 6109.10.0065, HTSUSA,
v. 6109.10.0070, HTSUSA
Dear Ms. Cumins:
This ruling is in response to your request of April 16,
1992, on behalf of your client, Leonard A. Feinberg, Inc., for
reconsideration of a Customs pre-entry classification ruling, PC
868360 of November 26, 1991. Specifically, you have requested
reconsideration of the classification decision in PC 868360
regarding style 9106, a women's knit, cotton/spandex, upper body
garment. The garment will be imported from Hong Kong.
FACTS:
A sample garment, style 9106, was received with your request
of April 16, 1992. The garment is a sleeveless pullover style
upper body garment made of finely knit 95 percent cotton/5
percent spandex fabric. It has a V-neck front and back, shoulder
straps which measure less than two inches in width at the top of
the shoulder, oversized armholes and a hemmed bottom. The
garment extends from the shoulders to below the waist.
ISSUE:
Is the submitted garment, style 9106, classifiable as a
women's tank top of subheading 6109.10.0060, HTSUSA, requiring a
visa for category 339, or is it a women's garment which is
similar to a tank top and thus classifiable in subheading
6109.10.0070, HTSUSA, requiring a visa for category 339-S?
-2-
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Classification of goods under the HTSUSA is governed by the
General Rules of Interpretation (GRIs). GRI 1 provides that
"classification shall be determined according to the terms of the
headings and any relative section or chapter notes and, provided
such headings or notes do not otherwise require, according to
[the remaining GRIs taken in order]."
The HTSUSA and the Explanatory Notes, which are the official
interpretation of the HTS at the international level, offer no
assistance in distinguishing a tank top from a garment similar to
a tank top. Therefore, it is reasonable to look to the
Guidelines for the Reporting of Imported Products in Various
Textile and Apparel Categories, CIE 13/88, for guidance regarding
characteristics normally associated with garments commercially
known as tank tops.
The Guidelines were developed and revised in accordance with
the HTSUSA to insure uniformity, to facilitate statistical
classification, and to assist in the determination of the
appropriate textile categories established for the administration
of the Arrangement Regarding International Trade in Textiles.
They offer guidance to the trade community and Customs personnel
as to various characteristics of garments and may be used as an
aid in determining the commercial designation of articles. It is
important, however, to remember that the Guidelines are not hard
and fast rules, but guidance in drawing distinctions between
classes of garments.
In the Guidelines at page 13, tank tops are described as:
...sleeveless [garments] with oversized armholes, with or
without a significant drop below the arm. The front and the
back may have a round, V, U, scoop, boat, square or other
shaped neck which must be below the nape of the neck. the
body of the garment is supported by straps not over two
inches in width reaching over the shoulder. The straps must
be attached to the garment and not be easily detachable.
Bottom hems may be straight or curved, side-vented, or of
any other type normally found on a blouse or shirt,
including blouson or drawstring waists or an elastic bottom.
The following features would preclude a garment from
consideration as a tank top:
1) pockets, real or simulated, other than breast
pockets;
2) any belt treatment including simple loops;
3) any type of front or back neck opening (zipper,
button, or otherwise).
-3-
Having examined style 9106, this office agrees with you and
your client that the garment falls within the description of a
tank top as set out in the Textile Guidelines. We believe style
9106 is properly classified as a tank top and that PC 868360 was
is error classifying the garment as similar to a tank top.
HOLDING:
Style 9106 is classifiable as a women's cotton knit tank top
in subheading 6109.10.0060, HTSUSA, textile category 339,
dutiable at 21 percent ad valorem.
In order to insure uniformity in Customs classification of
this merchandise and eliminate uncertainty, we are modifying PC
868360, effective with the date of this letter. If after your
review of this ruling letter, you disagree with the legal basis
for our decision, we invite you to submit any arguments you might
have with respect to this matter for our review. Any submission
you wish to make should be received within 30 days of the date of
this letter.
This notice to you should be considered a modification of PC
868360 under 19 CFR 177.9(d)(1). It is not to be applied
retroactively to PC 868360 (19 CFR 177.9(d)(2)) and will not,
therefore, affect past transactions for the importation of your
merchandise under that ruling. However, for the purposes of
future transactions in merchandise of this type, this
modification of PC 868360 will be in effect. We recognize that
pending transactions may be adversely affected by this
modification in that current contracts for importation arriving
at a port subsequent to this decision will be classified pursuant
to it. If such a situation arises, you may, at your discretion,
notify this office and may apply for relief from the binding
effects of this decision as may be warranted by the
circumstances. However, please be advised that in some instances
involving import restraints, such relief may require separate
approvals from other government agencies.
The designated textile and apparel category may be
subdivided into parts. If so, the visa and quota requirements
applicable to the subject merchandise may be affected. Since
part categories are the result of international bilateral
agreements which are subject to frequent renegotiations and
changes, to obtain the most current information available, we
suggest you check, close to the time of shipment, the Status
Report On Current Import Quotas (Restraint Levels), an internal
issuance of the U.S. Customs Service which is updated weekly and
is available for inspection at your local Customs office.
-4-
Due to the changeable nature of the statistical annotation
(the ninth and tenth digits of the classification) and the
restraint (quota/visa) categories, you should contact your local
Customs office prior to importation of this merchandise to
determine the current status of any import restraints or
requirements.
Sincerely,
John Durant, Director
Commercial Rulings Division
Ti chiedi come si applica questo testo alla tua situazione?
Consulenza gratuita, senza impegno
Descrivi la tua situazione. Il nostro team ti ricontatterà via e-mail per la tua consulenza.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.