2016 Frequently Asked Questions About STOP Formula Grants

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
About STOP Formula Grants
United States Department of Justice
Office on Violence Against Women
Updated February 2016

CONTENTS
Service Population ........................................................................................................................ 1
1. Can STOP funds be used to support services to children? .............................................................. 1
2. Can STOP funds support services for men? .................................................................................... 1
3. Can STOP funds be used to defend women who assault, kill, or otherwise injure their abusers?... 2
4. Can STOP funds be used to provide services to incarcerated victims of domestic violence, dating
violence, sexual assault, or stalking? ............................................................................................... 2
5. Can STOP subgrantees provide services to lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender victims ............ 3
Types of Services ........................................................................................................................... 4
1. Can legal services be supported with STOP funds? ........................................................................ 4
2. Can STOP funds be used to transport a woman safely out-of-state? ............................................... 4
3. Can a victim services organization receive an award to help place survivors in permanent housing
after shelter stay? For example, could the organization purchase furniture or pay moving costs?. 4
4. Under the STOP Program, can the state create a voucher program where victims are directly
given vouchers for such services as housing or counseling? ........................................................... 5
5. Can STOP dollars support batterers’ intervention programs? If so, what allocation should they be
funded under? .................................................................................................................................. 5
6. Can STOP funds support violence prevention programs, such as media campaigns to educate the
general public about violence against women?................................................................................ 5
7. What is the difference between prevention/education (which is limited to 5 percent) and
“outreach” which is more broadly allowable? ................................................................................. 5
8. Can programs in schools be supported with STOP funds? .............................................................. 6
9. When can STOP funds be used to assist child sexual abuse victims? ............................................. 6
10. Can STOP funds be used to address child sexual abuse when the victim is now an adult? ............ 6
11. Can STOP funds be used to pay for health care providers’ time conducting forensic
examinations? .................................................................................................................................. 6
12. If the state is using STOP funds to pay for forensic examinations, do the medical providers
performing the exams need to have any particular training or certification?................................... 6
13. If the state pays for sexual assault forensic examinations, which allocation should it come from? 7
14. Can a state provide funding to a child advocacy center? ................................................................. 7
15. Can STOP support payment for substance abuse counseling for domestic abuse or sexual assault
victims? ............................................................................................................................................ 7
16. Can STOP support alternative treatments for victims? .................................................................... 7
Financial Issues ............................................................................................................................. 8
1. Can STOP funds be used to purchase equipment that will be used partially for purposes other than
those outlined in the STOP program? .............................................................................................. 8
2. Can STOP funds be used to purchase automobiles? ........................................................................ 8
3. Can STOP funds be used to purchase food? .................................................................................... 8
4. Are the salaries of prosecutors, law enforcement officers or judges considered allowable costs? .. 8
5. Can STOP funds be used to pay for immigration fees for battered immigrant women? ................. 8

6. Can STOP dollars support the operational costs of a facility, such as a shelter?............................. 8
7. Can a state agency use STOP funds to support a project it would like to undertake itself? ............ 9
8. Can a state allow a subgrantee to charge indirect costs to the subgrant? ......................................... 9
9. If income is generated through grant-funded activities, how should that income be used? ............ 9
10. Is there a difference between “supplies” and “equipment”? ............................................................ 9
11. Can STOP funds be used for renovations or construction? ........................................................... 10
12. Do states have an administrative allowance? ................................................................................. 10
13. Can unused administrative money be reallocated to fund subgrants? ........................................... 10
14. Can a subgrantee charge a fee for counseling (therapy) of sexual assault victims? ...................... 10
15. Can a subgrantee provide gift cards, such as gas cards or grocery cards, to support victims? ...... 10
16. Can STOP funds be used to provide stipends to victims who attend focus groups? ..................... 10
17. Can STOP funds be used to purchase groceries? ........................................................................... 11
18. Can a subgrantee pay for the first month’s rent or rental deposit for a victim of domestic violence
as part of the provision of transitional housing? ............................................................................ 11
19. Is the purchase of equipment and supplies allowable in the last month of a grant? ...................... 11
20. How is the administrative allowance calculated? For example, is it taken off the top of the award
amount, is it taken out of each allocation, or is it part of the “discretionary” category? ............... 11
21. Can STOP be used to pay for co-location of services, such as Family Justice Centers? ............... 12
Match ........................................................................................................................................... 13
A. Statute ...................................................................................................................................... 13
1. What is the statutory language regarding match? .......................................................................... 13
B. Exemption ................................................................................................................................ 13
2. What entities are covered by the match exemption in 42 U.S.C. § 13925(b)(1)?.......................... 13
3. When is the state exempted from match? ...................................................................................... 13
4. Are there situations where victim service providers can be required to provide match?............... 14
5. Is it permissible to request exempt victim service providers to voluntarily provide match? ......... 14
6. Is the match exemption based on the initial awards or final awards? For example, if a state gives
funding to a law enforcement agency for law enforcement purposes, but the funds are returned
and the state reallocates the returned funds to a victim service provider for victim services, is
match required?.............................................................................................................................. 15
C. General Issues ......................................................................................................................... 15
7. How should the value of in-kind match be determined? ............................................................... 15
8. Do the match funds need to follow the allocation formula (i.e., 25 percent law enforcement, 25
percent prosecution, 5 percent courts, 30 percent victim services)? .............................................. 15
D. Waiver ...................................................................................................................................... 15
9. Who is eligible to submit a request for a match waiver? ............................................................... 15
10. How does a state request a match waiver? ..................................................................................... 15
11. When should a state administrator make a request for a match waiver? ....................................... 16
12. What is the standard for granting a match waiver? ........................................................................ 16
13. What type of evidence demonstrates “financial need?”................................................................. 16
14. What should a waiver application include? ................................................................................... 16
15. How does a grantee learn of OVW’s match waiver decision?....................................................... 17
16. What if OVW denies the waiver request? ...................................................................................... 17

17. If a state receives a match waiver for one grant award, will it automatically receive approval for
the next grant award period? .......................................................................................................... 17
Allocation Issues .......................................................................................................................... 18
1. If a state does not receive enough fundable projects in a particular allocation to meet the set aside
for that category, can the state reallocate these funds to another allocation category?.................. 18
2. What if a state allocates funding to a subgrantee, but gets the money back? ................................ 18
3. Should states make decisions to award law enforcement, prosecution, court, and victim services
funds based on the purpose for which the funds will be used or the type of agency applying for
the funds? ....................................................................................................................................... 19
4. What types of entities are eligible for the 30 percent for victim services? .................................... 19
5. Under which category would a probation or parole project be funded? ........................................ 19
6. Can STOP funds be subgranted to state law enforcement or prosecution training divisions, such
as Police Officer Standards and Training (POST) offices? ........................................................... 19
7. What allocation should be used for funding under the new prevention purpose area? .................. 20
8. What entities can receive funds under the courts allocation? ........................................................ 20
9. Can a court receive the funds but then pass some or all of them through to a victim service
provider? ........................................................................................................................................ 20
10. What type of agencies can receive funds under the 10 percent set aside within victim services for
“culturally specific community-based organizations?” ................................................................. 20
11. What type of subgrant entities are required to have 501(c)(3) status? ........................................... 21
12. What victim populations may be served under the set aside for culturally specific community-
based organizations? ...................................................................................................................... 21
13. Can other underserved populations, such as Deaf victims LGBT victims, and religious minorities
be served with the culturally specific set aside? ............................................................................ 22
14. How is the new 20 percent sexual assault set aside calculated? .................................................... 22
Subgrant Management Issues .................................................................................................... 23
1. What can OVW do if a subgrantee is misappropriating funds? ..................................................... 23
2. Can a state put a special condition on its subawards prohibiting activities that may compromise
victim safety? ................................................................................................................................. 23
3. To what extent should states control subgrant details and monitor subgrants? ............................. 23
4. Can states look at client records in monitoring subgrants? ............................................................ 23
5. What is the difference between a subgrant and a contract? ........................................................... 24
6. What information is required in a subgrant? .................................................................................. 24
VAWA 2013 Questions ............................................................................................................... 25
1. When do the changes in VAWA 2013 take effect? ....................................................................... 25
2. What purpose areas did VAWA 2013 add to the STOP Program? ................................................ 25
3. What changes were made to the rape exam payment certification? .............................................. 25
4. Can states still require, or ask, victims to submit charges for the exams to their personal insurance
providers?....................................................................................................................................... 26
5. What does it mean to “coordinate with health care providers in the region to notify victims of
sexual assault of the availability of rape exams at no cost to the victims?” .................................. 26

6. When do states need to be in compliance with the revised rape exam payment certification?...... 26
7. What changes were made to the fees and costs certification? ....................................................... 26
8. When do states need to be in compliance with the revised fees and costs certification?............... 26
9. What is the new sexual assault set aside requirement? .................................................................. 26
10. What is the compliance deadline for the new sexual assault set aside? ......................................... 27
11. How can states ensure that the projects funded under the set aside “meaningfully” address sexual
assault? ........................................................................................................................................... 27
12. What changes did VAWA 2013 make to the implementation planning process? ......................... 27
13. How should states coordinate their implementation plans with the state plans for the Family
Violence Prevention and Services Act and the Victims of Crime Act and Rape Prevention
Education Programs? How will states be expected to document this coordination? ..................... 28
14. What entities must states consult and coordinate with in developing their implementation plans?
29
15. Are all collaborating partners members of the “planning committee?” ......................................... 29
16. How will states be expected to provide “documentation from each member of the planning
committee as to their participation in the planning process?” ....................................................... 30
17. What documentation should states provide for entities that were consulted but were not part of the
formal planning committee? .......................................................................................................... 31
18. What does it mean to consult with tribes? Does it need to include all the tribes in states with
significant numbers of tribes? ........................................................................................................ 31
19. What do states need to do to “provide goals and objectives for reducing domestic violence-related
homicides” in their implementation plans?.................................................................................... 31
20. When is the implementation plan due? .......................................................................................... 32
Certification Questions ............................................................................................................... 33
A. Judicial Notification ................................................................................................................ 33
1. Does the Judicial Notification certification apply to local courts not under the control of the state
courts? ............................................................................................................................................ 33
2. Under the Judicial Notice certification, would a state be in compliance if the notice is provided by
law enforcement through the incident report, rather than through the courts? .............................. 33
B. Forensic Examinations ........................................................................................................... 33
3. What is required by the state to comply with the forensic examination certification? .................. 33
4. What is a "forensic medical exam?" .............................................................................................. 33
5. What does a state have to do to "incur the full out-of-pocket cost" of forensic medical exams? .. 34
6. What is the definition of "full out-of-pocket costs?" ..................................................................... 34
7. Can STOP funds be used to pay for a health care provider’s time conducting forensic
examinations? ................................................................................................................................ 34
8. Can STOP Program funds pay for other aspects of SANE/SAFE programs even if the two above
requirements are not met? .............................................................................................................. 34
9. What if the hospital charges a fee for the use of the examination room? ...................................... 35
10. Can the state require victims to submit the claims for the cost of the exam to their personal health
insurance providers? ...................................................................................................................... 35
11. Are states permitted to require victims to cooperate with law enforcement as a condition for
receiving a free exam? ................................................................................................................... 35

12. Can a state set a limit on the cost of the exam? ............................................................................. 36
13. Can a state use its Crime Victims Compensation Fund to pay for the forensic exams? ................ 36
14. Under the forensic exam certification, is the state required to provide exams for victims of child
sexual abuse? ................................................................................................................................. 36
15. What should states do when the victim is raped in one state but gets the medical forensic exam in
another?.......................................................................................................................................... 36
C. Fees and Costs ......................................................................................................................... 36
16. What grant programs are affected by the “fees and costs” certification? ...................................... 36
17. Who is affected by the “fees and costs” certification? ................................................................... 37
18. What is required to comply with the “fees and costs” certification? ............................................. 37
19. Do applicants need to change their statutes to come into compliance with the “fees and costs”
certification? .................................................................................................................................. 37
20. What if an applicant’s statute is silent on the issue of fees? .......................................................... 37
21. As a policy matter, why is it important to comply with this requirement? .................................... 37
22. Can grant funds be used to cover these fees and costs? ................................................................. 38
23. Can the respondent or defendant be charged fees in connection with protection orders or criminal
cases? ............................................................................................................................................. 38
24. What if the state law provides that persons below a certain income can get a fee waiver? ........... 38
25. Can victims be charged these fees if they are later reimbursed? ................................................... 38
26. What if the respondent, defendant, or subject of a warrant or witness subpoena lives out of state?
Who should pay the costs of service in such cases? ...................................................................... 38
27. What types of protection orders are covered by the requirement?................................................. 39
28. Can fees be charged for general protection orders such as “antiharassment” or “repeat violence”
orders?............................................................................................................................................ 39
29. What if a victim of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking returns to court
to request a modification of a protection order? ............................................................................ 39
30. If the court denies a petition for an order, can the petitioner then be charged fees? ...................... 39
31. Can fees still be charged for divorce cases filed by victims of domestic violence, dating violence,
sexual assault or stalking? .............................................................................................................. 39
D. Polygraphing ........................................................................................................................... 40
32. Does the polygraph testing prohibition mean that victim polygraphs can never be used in a sexual
assault investigation? ..................................................................................................................... 40
Miscellaneous............................................................................................................................... 41
1. Can universities be STOP subgrantees?......................................................................................... 41
2. Why is there a greater emphasis in the STOP Program on collaboration with nonprofit,
nongovernmental victim services programs than with law enforcement and prosecution? ........... 41
3. Is it possible to change the project period or end date of the grant? .............................................. 41
4. Is it possible change the project start date of the grant? ................................................................ 41

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
1
NOTE: These FAQs have been updated to reflect changes made by the Violence Against
Women Reauthorization Act of 2013 (VAWA 2013). These changes took effect on October
1, 2014, with the fiscal year (FY) 2014 grants. If the funding involved is from FY 2013 or
earlier, please refer to the FAQs updated January 2013. They have also been updated to
reflect changes from 2 CFR Part 200, which generally take effect with 2015 grants.
SERVICE POPULATION
1. Can STOP funds be used to support services to children?
Yes, in limited circumstances. STOP funds should be used for projects that serve or focus on
adult and youth (age 11-24) women and girls who are victims of domestic violence, dating
violence, sexual assault, or stalking. In general, victims served with STOP funds must be
adults or youth. Under a new purpose area created by VAWA 2005, however, STOP funds
may also support “complementary new initiatives and emergency services for victims and
their families." For example, STOP funds may support services for secondary victims such
as children who witness domestic violence.
2. Can STOP funds support services for men?
Yes, in some circumstances. The STOP statute states that "[t]he purpose of this [part] is to
assist states, state and local courts (including juvenile courts), Indian tribal governments,
tribal courts and units of local government to develop and strengthen effective law
enforcement and prosecution strategies to combat violent crimes against women, and to
develop and strengthen victim services in cases involving violent crimes against women." 42
U.S.C. § 3796gg(a). Accordingly, with the exception of projects under the two purpose areas
discussed below, and in certain circumstances in other projects, the focus of the subgrant
projects must be on violence against women.
In VAWA 2013, Congress added two new purpose areas that specifically included men,
which means that subgrantees under those purpose areas may have projects that target male
victims. The specific purpose areas are purpose area 17 (focusing on programs addressing
sexual assault against men, women, and youth in correctional and detention settings) and
purpose area 19 (focusing on services and responses targeting male and female victims of
domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking, whose ability to access
traditional services and responses is affected by their sexual orientation or gender identity).
Regardless of the purpose of the STOP subaward, STOP subgrantees must provide services
to a male victim in need who is similarly situated to female victims the subgrantee ordinarily
serves and who requests services. Under the anti-discrimination provision of the Omnibus
Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. § 3789d(c)(1) and under a new
nondiscrimination grant condition from VAWA 2013, grantees, including STOP subgrantees,
may not exclude any person from receiving grant-funded services on a number of prohibited
grounds, including that person’s sex. The VAWA 2013 provision further provides that “If

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
2
sex segregation or sex-specific programming is necessary to the essential operation of a
program, nothing in this paragraph shall prevent any such program or activity from
consideration of an individual’s sex. In such circumstances, grantees may meet the
requirements of this paragraph by providing comparable services to individuals who cannot
be provided with the sex-segregated or sex-specific programming.” For more information on
the VAWA 2013 nondiscrimination provision, please see the separate FAQ document at
www.justice.gov/ovw/docs/faqs-ngc-vawa.pdf.
To summarize, although the focus of the projects should be on female victims (with the
exception of the two new purpose areas), subgrantees are expected to serve male victims who
are in need and request services.
3. Can STOP funds be used to defend women who assault, kill, or otherwise injure their
abusers?
No. STOP funds cannot be used to fund any criminal defense work, including defending
women who assault, kill, or otherwise injure their abusers.
4. Can STOP funds be used to provide services to incarcerated victims of domestic
violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking?
Yes. As described above, there is now a specific purpose area for “developing, enlarging, or
strengthening programs addressing sexual assault against men, women, and youth in
correctional or detention settings.” The services provided, however, may only address the
domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking victimization experienced by
the incarcerated individual, including both such crimes experienced while incarcerated and
crimes experienced at other points in their youth and adult lives. Funds should not be used to
provide any other types of services, such as rehabilitative services related to the crime
committed by the incarcerated individual. Finally, as is the case with the use of all STOP
funds, states must use those funds to supplement state funds, and not to supplant state funds
that would otherwise be available for the activities funded.
Although STOP funds may be used to provide victim services as described above, other
federal funds do have restrictions on serving incarcerated victims.
In addition, please note that under the Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA), states must
either certify to compliance with standards issued under PREA, submit an assurance that they
will use five percent of “covered funds” (4.75% of STOP funds) to come into compliance
with PREA, or lose five percent of covered funds (4.75% of STOP funds). For more
information on this, please see the FAQ at www.justice.gov/ovw/docs/stop-prea-faq.pdf and
the fact sheet at www.justice.gov/ovw/docs/stop-prea-reallocation.pdf.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
3
5. Can STOP subgrantees provide services to lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender
(LGBT) victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking with
STOP funds?
Yes. There is a new purpose area for developing, enlarging, or strengthening programs and
projects to provide services and responses targeting male and female victims of domestic
violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking, whose ability to access traditional
services and responses is affected by their sexual orientation or gender identity, as defined in
section 249(c) of title 18, United States Code. In addition, the new nondiscrimination grant
condition described in the answer to question 2, above, provides that subgrantees may not
exclude any person from receiving grant-funded services on a number of prohibited grounds,
including that person’s sexual orientation or gender identity.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
4
TYPES OF SERVICES
1. Can legal services be supported with STOP funds?
Yes. Under purpose area 5, as amended, states can now provide a full range of legal
services, such as housing, family law, public benefits, and other similar matters. Any
subgrantee providing legal assistance must certify that:
1) any person providing legal assistance with STOP funds
a. has demonstrated expertise in providing legal assistance to victims of
domestic violence dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking in the
targeted population; or
b.
i. is partnered with an entity or person that has such
demonstrated expertise and
ii. has completed or will complete training in connection with domestic
violence, dating violence, stalking, sexual assault, and related legal
issues, including training on evidence-based risk factors for domestic
and dating violence homicide;
2) any training program conducted in satisfaction of the requirement of paragraph (1)
has been or will be developed with input from and in collaboration with a tribal,
state, territorial, or local domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or
stalking victim service provider or coalition, as well as appropriate tribal, state,
territorial, and local law enforcement officials;
3) any person or organization providing legal assistance through the STOP program
has informed and will continue to inform state, local, or tribal domestic violence,
dating violence, or sexual assault programs and coalitions, as well as appropriate
state and local law enforcement officials of their work; and
4) the subgrantee’s organizational policies do not require mediation or counseling
involving offenders and victims physically together, in cases where sexual
assault, domestic violence, dating violence, or child sexual abuse is an issue.
2. Can STOP funds be used to transport a woman safely out-of-state?
Yes, in limited circumstances. STOP funds may be used to cover reasonable transportation
costs that would enhance a woman’s safety.
3. Can a victim services organization receive an award to help place survivors in
permanent housing after shelter stay? For example, could the organization purchase
furniture or pay moving costs?
No. STOP funds may not be used to pay for moving household goods to a new location or
acquiring furniture or housing in a new location. However, STOP funds may be used to
cover reasonable transportation costs that would enhance a woman’s safety. Please see

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
5
question 18 under Financial Issues for a discussion of paying rent for provision of transitional
housing.
4. Under the STOP Program, can the state create a voucher program where victims are
directly given vouchers for such services as housing or counseling?
No. The statutory purposes of the STOP Program do not authorize creation of a voucher
program.
5. Can STOP dollars support batterers’ intervention programs? If so, what allocation
should they be funded under?
Yes. Batterers’ intervention programs may be supported provided that the programs are part
of a graduated range of sanctions that use the coercive power of the criminal justice system to
hold abusers accountable for their criminal actions and for changing their behavior. However,
couples counseling or any intervention that requires participation by a victim or that is not
designed to hold offenders accountable for their violent behavior cannot be supported with
STOP dollars.
The specific allocation may depend on the circumstances of the program and the particular
state. Batterers’ intervention may be supported through the “discretionary” portion of a
state’s formula grant (i.e., the 15 percent that is not designated for law enforcement,
prosecution, courts, or victim services) or the courts portion.
6. Can STOP funds support violence prevention programs, such as media campaigns to
educate the general public about violence against women?
Yes. In VAWA 2013, Congress added a new purpose area for “developing, enhancing, or
strengthening prevention and educational programming to address domestic violence, dating
violence, sexual assault, or stalking[.]” However, no more than 5 percent of the state’s total
STOP award for the year may be used for this purpose.
7. What is the difference between prevention/education (which is limited to 5 percent) and
“outreach” which is more broadly allowable?
The goal of prevention is to stop or reduce domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault,
and stalking. By contrast, an outreach initiative is linked to a specific set of services and the
goal is to increase awareness about the services, so that victims know where to go for the
services.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
6
8. Can programs in schools be supported with STOP funds?
Yes, programs in schools may be supported to the extent that they fit within one or more of
the STOP program’s statutory program purpose areas. For example, STOP funds could be
used to provide support groups that meet at school for dating violence victims or to provide
information to students about services available to help victims of dating violence.
Prevention programs are now allowed under new purpose area #20 but are limited to not
more than five percent of funds.
9. When can STOP funds be used to assist child sexual abuse victims?
STOP funds can serve sexual assault victims who are age 11 or older. VAWA defines sexual
assault as “any nonconsensual sexual act proscribed by federal, tribal, or state law, including
when the victim lacks the capacity to consent.” The target of the STOP Program is adult and
youth victims. Youth is defined as “a person who is 11 to 24 years old.”
10. Can STOP funds be used to address child sexual abuse when the victim is now an
adult?
Yes, STOP funds may be used to address child sexual abuse when the victim is now an adult,
provided that the abuse occurred or continued when the victim was age 11 or older.
11. Can STOP funds be used to pay for health care providers’ time conducting forensic
examinations?
Yes. Beginning with FY 2007 awards to the states, STOP funds may be used for health care
providers’ time conducting forensic examinations, if two requirements are met:
1. the examinations are performed by specially trained examiners for victims of sexual
assault (such as Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners (SANEs) or Sexual Assault
Forensic Examiners (SAFEs)); and
2. the jurisdiction does not require victims of sexual assault to seek reimbursement from
their insurance carriers.
12. If the state is using STOP funds to pay for forensic examinations, do the medical
providers performing the exams need to have any particular training or certification?
No, the medical providers do not need to have particular sexual assault forensic exam
training. They do need to have sexual assault training, but the specific nature and form of
that training is not defined by statute. States can determine the most appropriate training for
the needs of their states. The National Training Standards for Sexual Assault Medical
Forensic Examiners (available at www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ovw/213827.pdf) provides
recommendations on training for medical providers performing forensic examinations.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
7
13. If the state pays for sexual assault forensic examinations, which allocation should it
come from?
It could come from law enforcement, prosecution, or discretionary. Please refer to the
definitions section of VAWA for definitions of law enforcement and prosecution. A high-
quality forensic exam could benefit either of these disciplines, depending on the structure and
systems in the individual state. States should make decisions based on the laws, policies, and
practices of their own state as to the most appropriate allocation. As discussed above, this
only applies starting with FY 2007 funds.
14. Can a state provide funding to a child advocacy center?
Yes, it is technically allowable but, as described above, the state must ensure that the funding
only supports services for victims age 11 and older. States should also think carefully about
which allocation (law enforcement, prosecution, victim services, or discretionary) to use for
this purpose, depending on the purpose of the subgrant.
15. Can STOP support payment for substance abuse counseling for domestic abuse or
sexual assault victims?
Yes, in limited circumstances. STOP funds may not be used for general substance abuse
counseling, but they may be used for victim service providers that wish to focus on providing
services to victims with substance abuse issues.
16. Can STOP support alternative treatments for victims?
Yes, but on a limited basis. The subgrantee has to provide specific justification for the type
of approach, such as research on the benefits of the specific type of treatment to domestic
violence or sexual assault survivors. There would also need to be justification that the cost of
service was reasonable.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
8
FINANCIAL ISSUES
1. Can STOP funds be used to purchase equipment that will be used partially for
purposes other than those outlined in the STOP program?
STOP funds may be used to partially purchase equipment that will be used for the STOP
project as well as other purposes if the expenses are prorated according to the percentage of
time that the equipment is used for STOP purposes. For example, a state could use STOP
funds to support a portion of the digitalization of a 911 network if it can document the
percentage of expenses based on the number of calls received for domestic violence, dating
violence, sexual assault, and stalking.
2. Can STOP funds be used to purchase automobiles?
No, STOP funds cannot be used to purchase vehicles. Please note that this is a change from a
1998 memorandum that authorized the purchase of vehicles under certain circumstances.
3. Can STOP funds be used to purchase food?
Yes, in some instances. The provision of food and beverages at training events or
conferences is governed by the most recent version of the DOJ Financial Guide lease review
the requirements carefully in determining if food provision at a particular event is acceptable
and contact the state’s grant manager if the state has any questions. Food provision within
the context of victim services (e.g., providing food in shelters) is permissible if the food is
necessary or integral to providing services to women to enhance their safety.
4. Are the salaries of prosecutors, law enforcement officers or judges considered allowable
costs?
Yes, if the paid prosecutors, law enforcement officers, or judges are handling cases involving
violence against women. If they are not working full time on violence against women cases,
their time must be prorated.
5. Can STOP funds be used to pay for immigration fees for battered immigrant women?
No, such fees are not within the scope of the STOP Program.
6. Can STOP dollars support the operational costs of a facility, such as a shelter?
Yes, except that if the project is supported with funds from other sources as well (e.g.,
Victims of Crime Act or Family Violence Prevention and Services Act funds), the rent and
operational expenses must be prorated among the different funding sources. In addition, the

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
9
rent must be reasonable. If, however, the shelter owns its own facility, rent for use of that
facility may not be charged to the grant at all; however, related expenses such as utilities and
building security may be charged to the grant. As discussed below, renovations and
construction may not be supported with STOP funds.
7. Can a state agency use STOP funds to support a project it would like to undertake
itself?
Yes, as long as the project fits within the enumerated purpose areas. In such cases, however,
the state will need to ensure that the STOP funds that are being used to support the project
are supplementing and not supplanting non-federal funds that would otherwise be available
for such a purpose. The state will also need to carefully consider the appropriate allocation
for such a project, and should submit a STOP subgrant progress report regarding the specific
project.
8. Can a state allow a subgrantee to charge indirect costs to the subgrant?
Yes. Furthermore, if a subgrantee has a federally approved indirect cost rate, the state must
honor it. If there is no federally approved indirect cost rate, the state must recognize a rate
negotiated between the state and the subgrantee (in accordance with 2 CFR 200) or a “de
minimus indirect cost rate” of 10% of Modified Total Direct Costs as defined in 2 CFR
§200.414.
9. If income is generated through grant-funded activities, how should that income be
used?
Grantees must receive prior approval from OVW before they earn program income.
Subgrantees must receive approval from the state. Program income may be added to the
award amount, used to reduce program costs (with the extra amount returned to the Federal
government), or used toward the matching requirement. Program income may only be used
for allowable program costs, however, and must be expended prior to additional drawdowns.
Please see the most recent version of the DOJ Financial Guide for more information on this
topic.
10. Is there a difference between “supplies” and “equipment?”
Yes. “Equipment” consists of non-expendable items. Federal guidelines define equipment
as tangible personal property having a useful life of more than one year and a per unit
acquisition cost which equals or exceeds the lesser of the capitalization threshold of the non-
federal entity or $5,000. States should follow their own guidelines for capitalization of
equipment. Supplies are all tangible property other than that defined as equipment. Supplies
are generally items that will be expended during the project period. See 2 CFR §200.33
Equipment and 2 CFR §200.94 Supplies for definitions.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
10
11. Can STOP funds be used for renovations or construction?
No. STOP monies cannot be used for renovations or construction. This includes even such
seemingly minor renovations as painting or replacing carpet.
12. Do states have an administrative allowance?
Yes. States can use up to 10 percent of funds for administrative costs.
13. Can unused administrative money be reallocated to fund subgrants?
If the state does not need the full 10 percent, these funds should be used to support subgrants.
14. Can a subgrantee charge a fee for counseling (therapy) of sexual assault victims?
Yes, at the discretion of the state administering agency. This income, however, should be
treated as program income. See the DOJ Financial Guide and question 9, above, for more
details on the allowable uses for program income.
15. Can a subgrantee provide gift cards, such as gas cards or grocery cards, to support
victims?
OVW strongly discourages the use of gift cards, because oversight of expenditures is very
difficult to manage and there is a high risk of misuse. Gift cards are only allowable to the
extent that they are used for purposes that are otherwise an allowable use of STOP funds,
such as to purchase groceries for victims as described in question 17, below. If the grantee or
subgrantee determines that use of gift cards is necessary to provide services to victims, they
must ensure that effective control and accountability is maintained over gift cards and that
those cards are used solely for authorized purposes. As noted in question 3 under Subgrant
Management Issues, states are responsible for ensuring that their subgrantees use STOP
funds appropriately. Please contact OVW’s Grants Financial Management Division if the
state has specific questions about adequate fiscal controls regarding the use of gift cards,
including tracking and safeguarding of cards and ensuring that all items purchased with those
cards are within the scope of the STOP program and are allowable under federal regulations.
16. Can STOP funds be used to provide stipends to victims who attend focus groups?
It is allowable to provide a stipend intended to reimburse the participants for their costs in
attending, such as mileage, gas, childcare, etc. This can be done through actual
reimbursement or through a generic gift card in an amount intended to compensate for such
costs of attending. (As noted above, States are responsible to ensure adequate fiscal controls

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
11
are in place when gift cards are used.) Focus groups must be part of the implementation of
one of the STOP Program purpose areas. For example, a jurisdiction might want to hold a
focus group as part of the development of local “policies that enhance best practices for
responding to domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking.”
17. Can STOP funds be used to purchase groceries?
Yes. STOP funding may be used to purchase groceries as part of victim services that
subgrantees provide to victims. Grantees and subgrantees need to have a process in place to
ensure that all items purchased are allowable, reasonable and necessary under applicable
state and federal statutes and regulations and used for program purposes. Pursuant to federal
regulations, the purchase of any alcohol, tobacco, or related products is strictly prohibited
with the use of grant funds.
18. Can a subgrantee pay for the first month’s rent or rental deposit for a victim of
domestic violence as part of the provision of transitional housing?
Yes, STOP funds can be used to pay the first month’s rent. Deposits are also allowable if the
subgrantee has an agreement in place with the landlord that the full/remaining deposit will be
returned to the subgrantee and not the victim at the end of the lease. OVW advises that the
subgrantees arrange to pay the first month’s rent, rather than a security deposit, to alleviate
the need to recover and account for the deposit.
19. Is the purchase of equipment and supplies allowable in the last month of a grant?
Equipment and supplies are allowable costs under the STOP program. Grantees and
subgrantees, however, should plan and budget for equipment and supplies early in the grant
project to ensure the full benefit of the purchase is received. Purchasing equipment and
supplies during the last month of the grant may not be undertaken merely for the purpose of
using unobligated funds, as this does not support the purpose of the program. OVW
therefore disfavors such purchases in the final month of a grant. Please contact the state’s
OVW program manager with questions about any particular purchases.
20. How is the administrative allowance calculated? For example, is it taken off the top of
the award amount, is it taken out of each allocation, or is it part of the “discretionary”
category?
The STOP statute requires that the designated allocation for each discipline (law
enforcement, courts, prosecution, and victims services) be taken from the total award
amount. We recognize the importance of both the administrative funds and the amount of
funds available to be used at the discretion of states and territories. Therefore, we have a
solution that would address these needs, while also ensuring adherence to STOP statute:

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
12
states may allocate up to 10 percent of each of the other STOP allocations to be used for
administration of the STOP grant. An example of the solution is as follows:
STOP award $1,000,000
 5% or $50,000 for Courts; of this amount up to $5,000 can be used for administration
 25% or $250,000 for Law Enforcement; of this amount up to $25,000 for
administration
 25% or $250,000 for Prosecution; of this amount up to $25,000 for administration
 30% or $300,000 for Victim Services; of this amount up to $30,000 for
administration
 15% or $150,000 at the state’s discretion; of this amount up to $15,000 for
administration
This solution gives states and territories the same amount of funds to meet the administrative
cost and discretionary needs, but also complies with the statute because each discipline
would receive the allocation amount calculated on the total amount awarded.
21. Can STOP be used to pay for co-location of services, such as Family Justice Centers?
Yes, STOP can pay for co-location of services under the purpose area for “maintaining core
victim services and criminal justice initiatives, while supporting complementary new
initiatives and emergency services for victims and their families.” However, if any of the
underlying services at the center cannot be funded through STOP, such as services for
children under 11, then the staffing for those services still cannot be supported through this
purpose area, just the co-location. For example, co-location costs might include a centralized
intake person, rent, or security. Such expenses should be pro-rated according to the
percentage of the services in the center that can be covered with STOP. For example if ten
percent of the services are out of scope of the STOP Program then STOP can pay up to
ninety percent of the co-location costs.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
13
MATCH
A. Statute
1. What is the statutory language regarding match?
42 U.S.C. § 13925 (b)(1) provides:
Match. – No matching funds shall be required for any grant or subgrant made under [the
Violence Against Women Act] for –
(A) any tribe, territory, or victim service provider; or
(B) any other entity, including a state, that –
i. petitions for a waiver of any match conditions imposed by the Attorney
General or the Secretaries of Health and Human Services or Housing and
Urban Development; and
ii. whose petition for waiver is determined by the Attorney General or the
Secretaries of Health and Human Services or Housing and Urban Development
to have adequately demonstrated the financial need of the petitioning entity.
42 U.S.C. § 3796gg-1(f) provides:
The federal share of a grant made under [the STOP Formula Program] may not exceed 75
percent of the total costs of the projects described in the application submitted, except
that, for purposes of this subsection, the costs of projects for victim services or tribes for
which there is an exemption under section 40002(b)(1) of the Violence Against Women
Act of 1994 (42 U.S.C. 13925(b)(1)) shall not count toward the total costs of the projects.
B. Exemption
2. What entities are covered by the match exemption in 42 U.S.C. § 13925(b)(1)?
Under VAWA 2005, the state cannot require matching funds for a grant or subgrant for any
tribe, territory, or victim service provider, regardless of funding allocation category.
3. When is the state exempted from match?
The state is exempted from matching the portion of the state award that goes to a victim
service provider for victim services or that goes to tribes. Territories are also exempted in
full. States can receive additional waiver of match based on a petition to OVW and a
demonstration of financial need.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
14
The below chart illustrates the specific situations where a state is exempt from match, and the
situations where states cannot pass match on to specific subgrantees:
Situation
Match is waived for
the subgrantee (but
not exempted for the
state)- the state
cannot require the
subgrantee to
provide the match,
but it is still required
of the state
Match is waived for
the subgrantee and
exempted for the
state- the state
cannot require the
subgrantee to
provide match and it
is not required of the
state
Match is neither
waived nor
exempted- the state
can require the
subgrantee to
provide match and it
is required of the
state
Award to victim service
provider for victim
services
X
Award to victim service
provider for another
purpose (for example law
enforcement training)
X
Award to tribe X
Awards to courts, law
enforcement, prosecution X
4. Are there situations where victim service providers can be required to provide match?
No, a “victim service provider,” as defined in VAWA, cannot be required to provide match.
See question 11 under Allocation Issues for a discussion of when a victim service provider is
required to have 501(c)(3) status. Such an entity can provide match voluntarily, including
“in kind” match. This includes situations where a victim service provider is receiving a
subgrant under a non-victim services allocation, such as law enforcement or prosecution.
5. Is it permissible to request exempt victim service providers to voluntarily provide
match?
Yes. Often victim service providers have ready sources of in-kind match such as donated
goods and volunteer services and may be willing to provide match even if not required to do
so. However, such provision of match must be truly voluntary; if the provider chooses not to
provide match, it should not suffer adverse consequences.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
15
6. Is the match exemption based on the initial awards or final awards? For example, if a
state gives funding to a law enforcement agency for law enforcement purposes, but the
funds are returned and the state reallocates the returned funds to a victim service
provider for victim services, is match required?
Match exemption is based on the final award. In the example above, match would not be
required for the amount that was reallocated to a victim service provider for victim services.
OVW will look at the time of closeout at the entities and purposes of funds and base the
required match on that.
C. General Issues
7. How should the value of in-kind match be determined?
In-kind match must be documented in the same manner as grant-funded activities. In-kind
match should be valued based on the fair market value of the goods or services. For example,
the value of a volunteer answering a hotline should be the same as what the agency would
pay an employee to answer the hotline. For more information see 2 CFR §200.306 Cost
sharing or matching and specific examples, please see
www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/ovw/legacy/2014/02/06/stop-match-requirement-for-
formula-grants.pdf.
8. Do the match funds need to follow the allocation formula (i.e., 25 percent law
enforcement, 25 percent prosecution, 5 percent courts, 30 percent victim services)?
No, they do not. For example, a state could use match provided by its law enforcement and
courts subgrantees to match its entire award.
D. Waiver
9. Who is eligible to submit a request for a match waiver?
For the purpose of requesting a waiver through OVW’s STOP Formula Program, eligible
recipients are states. Territories do not need to request a waiver because they are
automatically exempted from match.
10. How does a state request a match waiver?
An eligible applicant should formally request a match waiver by submitting a request letter
addressed to the Director of the Office on Violence Against Women. Please submit the
state’s waiver request and supporting documentation via grant adjustment notice in the
Grants Management System.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
16
11. When should a state administrator make a request for a match waiver?
As a general rule, a state has three months from the date of its most recent award to make a
waiver request for that award year.
12. What is the standard for granting a match waiver?
The OVW Director must determine that the applicant for a match waiver has adequately
demonstrated financial need.
13. What type of evidence demonstrates “financial need?”
Specific evidence of economic distress, such as documentation of high unemployment rates,
poverty rates, and designation as a FEMA disaster area, and how this affects the State’s
ability to provide violence against women matching funds may demonstrate financial need.
For example, if a state shows that across the board budget cuts have directly reduced funding
for violence against women by 20 percent, then the state would be considered for a 20
percent waiver, not a full waiver. Reductions in federal funds are not relevant to state match
unless the state can show that the reduced federal funding directly reduced available state
funds to support violence against women. The state would need to provide attachments to
demonstrate this effect, such as portions of the state budget demonstrating shifts in funding
or a letter from the Governor’s office.
14. What should a waiver application include?
States that wish to apply for full or partial waivers of match must submit documentation of
the following:
1) The sources of non-federal funds available to the state for match and the amount
available from each source, including in-kind match and match provided by subgrantees
or other entities;
2) Efforts made by the state to obtain the matching funds, including, if applicable, letters
from other state agencies stating that the funds available from such agencies may not be
used for match;
3) The specific dollar amount or percentage waiver that is requested;
4) Cause and extent of the constraints on the historical and projected ability to raise violence
against women matching funds; and
5) Specific evidence of economic distress, such as documentation of high unemployment
rates, poverty rates, and designation as a FEMA disaster area, and how this affects the
state’s ability to provide violence against women matching funds. For example, if a state
shows that across the board budget cuts have directly reduced funding for violence
against women programs by 20 percent, that state would be considered for a 20 percent

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
17
waiver, not a full waiver. Reductions in federal funds are not relevant to state match
unless the state can show that the reduced federal funding directly reduced available state
funds to support violence against women programs. The state would need to provide
attachments to demonstrate this effect, such as portions of the state budget demonstrating
shifts in funding or a letter from the Governor’s office.
15. How does a grantee learn of OVW’s match waiver decision?
Once OVW receives the formal request for a match waiver and supporting documentation
from the state, the time period from OVW review and consideration to notification will not
exceed 90 days. OVW will notify the appropriate state STOP administrator of all
determinations.
16. What if OVW denies the waiver request?
All requests for match waiver will be reviewed and considered by the Director of OVW on a
case-by-case basis. Approval of such a waiver will require significant justification for need
and will not be made automatically. All decisions are final.
17. If a state receives a match waiver for one grant award, will it automatically receive
approval for the next grant award period?
A match waiver decision is only good for the current grant award.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
18
ALLOCATION ISSUES
1. If a state does not receive enough fundable projects in a particular allocation to meet
the set aside for that category, can the state reallocate these funds to another allocation
category?
Yes. If a state does not receive sufficient eligible applications to award the full funding
within one of the allocations, then the state can reallocate the funds to another category.
States should have the following documentation on file to demonstrate lack of sufficient
eligible applications:
 A copy of their solicitation
 Documentation on how the solicitation was distributed, including all outreach efforts
to entities from the allocation in question
 An explanation of their selection process
 A list of who participated in the selection process (name, title, and employer)
 Number of applications that were received for the specific allocation category
 Information about the applications received, such as who they were from, how much
money they were requesting, and any reasons the applications were not funded
 Letters from any relevant state-wide body explaining the lack of applications (e.g., if
the state is seeking to reallocate money from courts, a letter from the State Court
Administrator)
 For the culturally specific allocation, demographic statistics of the relevant racial and
ethnic minority groups within the state and documentation that the state has reached
out to relevant OVW technical assistance providers and the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services Resource Centers for assistance in reaching the relevant
culturally- specific providers for the populations in their state (for information on
OVW TA Providers, please see https://ta2ta.org/directory.html; for more information
on the Resource Centers, please see
www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/fysb/programs/family-violence-prevention-
services/programs/centers.)
Although OVW approval is not required prior to reallocation, OVW encourages states to
reach out to their grant managers to ensure they have adequate justification, so that it does
not become an issue later during monitoring.
2. What if a state allocates funding to a subgrantee, but gets the money back?
If funds awarded from a subgrant are returned to the state, then the state can re-allocate them
under any allocation category (victim services, law enforcement, prosecution, courts,
discretionary). If the state’s award is at or near its end date, the funds would revert back to
OVW. However, a state may request one automatic extension not to exceed 12 months and,
in extraordinary circumstances, a second extension beyond 12 months as outlined in the DOJ
Financial Guide. The state should contact its OVW Program Specialist if seeking a second
extension.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
19
3. Should states make decisions to award law enforcement, prosecution, court, and victim
services funds based on the purpose for which the funds will be used or the type of
agency applying for the funds?
The current language of the STOP statute requires states to allocate certain percentages of
funding "for" law enforcement, prosecution, and victim services. The courts allocation must
be awarded “to” state and local courts. Decisions for law enforcement, prosecution, and
victim services should be made based on the beneficiary of the funded activities. For
example, a state may provide funds to its state coalition to provide training to police
throughout the state under the “law enforcement” category because the training is to benefit
law enforcement. Please review the definitions for law enforcement, prosecution, courts, and
victim services to assist in making these determinations. If a subgrant recipient under a
particular category is not the type of agency referred to in the category, states should ensure
that the correct type of agency will benefit from the funds. For example, if a state coalition
applies for law enforcement funds to train police, the application should include a
Memorandum of Understanding or other documentation from police agencies indicating that
they agree to attend the training and will be involved in the development of the training.
4. What types of entities are eligible for the 30 percent for victim services?
The 30 percent is “for victims services.” Victim services is defined in VAWA as “services
provided to victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking,
including telephonic or web-based hotlines, legal advocacy, economic advocacy, emergency
and transitional shelter, accompaniment and advocacy through medical, civil or criminal
justice, immigration, and social support systems, crisis intervention, short-term individual
and group support services, information, and referrals, culturally specific services, population
specific services, and other related supportive services.” As long as the type of service is one
described above, the subgrant can be awarded from the victim services allocation, regardless
of the type of entity receiving the funding.
5. Under which category would a probation or parole project be funded?
This would depend on the structure of the state’s criminal justice system. In some states,
these agencies are part of the court system. In others, they are considered law enforcement.
States should refer to the definitions of law enforcement and courts and use their best
judgment.
6. Can STOP funds be subgranted to state law enforcement or prosecution training
divisions, such as Police Officer Standards and Training (POST) offices?
Yes. Please see the VAWA definitions of law enforcement and prosecution.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
20
7. What allocation should be used for funding under the new prevention purpose area?
Prevention projects should be funded from the fifteen percent discretionary funding.
8. What entities can receive funds under the courts allocation?
The “courts” allocation is “to” courts, rather than “for” courts, so the money must be
awarded to a court entity. This includes state, local, tribal, and juvenile courts. “Court” is
defined in VAWA as “any civil, criminal, tribal, and Alaska Native Village, federal, state,
local, or territorial court having jurisdiction to address domestic violence, dating violence,
sexual assault, or stalking, including immigration, family, juvenile, and dependency courts,
and the judicial officers serving in those courts, including judges, magistrate judges,
commissioners, justices of the peace, or any other persons with decision making authority.”
Examples could include a state administrative office of the courts, a state supreme court, a
local domestic violence court, a local probation project (in a state where probation is part of
the courts). States should include their state court administrators on their planning
committees for advice on how to distribute court money in their states.
9. Can a court receive the funds but then pass some or all of them through to a victim
service provider?
Yes, as long as the funds are initially awarded “to” a court, the court can then subcontract
them to another entity for all or part of the project.
10. What type of agencies can receive funds under the 10 percent set aside within victim
services for “culturally specific community-based organizations?”
An organization is eligible to receive the culturally-specific set aside if the organization is a
nonprofit, nongovernmental organization or tribal organization that serves a specific
geographic community that:
 focuses primarily on domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking;
 has established a specialized culturally specific program that addresses domestic
violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking;
 has a primary focus on underserved populations (and includes representatives of these
populations) and domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking; or
 obtains expertise, or shows demonstrated capacity to work effectively, on domestic
violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking through collaboration;
and:
 is primarily directed toward racial and ethnic minority groups; and
 is providing services tailored to the unique needs of that population.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
21
An organization will qualify for funding if its primary mission is to address the needs of
racial and ethnic minority groups or if it has developed a special expertise regarding a
particular racial and ethnic minority group. (Please see question 12 below for definition of
covered racial and ethnic minorities.) The organization must do more than merely provide
services to the targeted group; rather, the organization must provide culturally competent
services designed to meet the specific needs of the target population.
In reviewing subgrant applications, states should look not only at the numbers of victims that
will be served, but also at how the services will be provided, whether the community to be
served has been involved in planning for the delivery of the services, and whether there will
be outreach to that community regarding the availability of the services. For example, if an
applicant proposes to provide services to Mexican immigrant victims, the state should
consider such things as: line items in the budget for certified interpreters; a demonstration
that the applicant has knowledge of and collaborative relationships with other organizations
relevant to the community; established outreach activities to the community; and on-going
staff training on Mexican culture. A community-based organization that accepts funding to
provide services to a particular racial and ethnic population cannot exclude others from
participating in its programs and activities based on race, color, religion, national origin, sex,
gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, or age.
11. What type of subgrant entities are required to have 501(c)(3) status?
As a result of VAWA 2013, any entity that is eligible for funding based on its status as a
nonprofit organization must be an organization that is described in section 501(c)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and is exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of that
Code. See 42 U.S.C. § 13925(b)(16)(B). In the STOP program, this applies to grantees under
the set aside to culturally specific community-based organizations, except for grantees that
are tribal governmental organizations. In addition, for the state to receive the victim service
match exemption, or for victim service providers to be waived from match, the victim service
providers must have 501(c)(3) status unless they are tribal governmental organizations or
governmental rape crisis centers (except in territories where governmental rape crisis centers
are not eligible as victim service providers).
12. What victim populations may be served under the set aside for culturally specific
community-based organizations?
The set aside may address “racial and ethnic minorities” as defined in section 1707(g) of the
Public Health Service Act, which means “American Indians (including Alaska Natives,
Eskimos, and Aleuts); Asian Americans; Native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders;
Blacks; and Hispanics.”

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
22
13. Can other underserved populations, such as Deaf victims LGBT victims, and religious
minorities be served with the culturally specific set aside?
No. The set aside is only for racial and ethnic minorities, as defined in the answer to
question 12, above. However, states are required to address in their implementation plans
how they will recognize and meaningfully respond to the needs of underserved populations,
which may include Deaf, LGBT, and other victim populations. “Underserved populations” is
defined as “populations who face barriers in accessing and using victim services, and
includes populations underserved because of geographic location, religion, sexual
orientation, gender identity, underserved racial and ethnic populations, populations
underserved because of special needs (such as language barriers, disabilities, alienage status,
or age), and any other population determined to be underserved by the Attorney General.”
14. How is the new 20 percent sexual assault set aside calculated?
Under VAWA 2013, 20 percent of funds granted to a state shall be allocated for programs or
projects in 2 or more allocations (victim services, courts, law enforcement, and prosecution)
that meaningfully address sexual assault, including stranger rape, acquaintance rape, alcohol
or drug- facilitated rape, and rape within the context of an intimate partner relationship. The
20 percent is counted on the total amount granted to the state, but is not a separate allocation.
For example, if a state received $100,000:
 The sexual assault set aside would be $20,000
 The victim services allocation would be $30,000
 The courts allocation would be $5,000
 The law enforcement and prosecution allocations would be $25,000 each
The $20,000 for sexual assault would not be in addition to these other allocations, but must
fit within at least 2 of them. So if the state used $10,000 of its victim services money for
sexual assault projects, it would need an additional $10,000 from courts, law enforcement,
and/or prosecution. Even if $20,000 of the state’s victim services allocation were spent on
sexual assault projects, the state would need to award sexual assault funding in the law
enforcement, courts, or prosecution allocations to meet the set aside. If the state is funding
sexual assault in a discretionary area (i.e., not victim services, courts, law enforcement, or
prosecution) it will not count toward the set aside.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
23
SUBGRANT MANAGEMENT ISSUES
1. What can OVW do if a subgrantee is misappropriating funds?
OVW’s relationship and monitoring obligation is at the state level because the state is the
grantee. If such misappropriation comes to the attention of OVW, the state would be held
responsible for the misuse of funds.
2. Can a state put a special condition on its subawards prohibiting activities that may
compromise victim safety?
Yes. OVW includes special conditions in its discretionary grant awards prohibiting activities
that may compromise victim safety. OVW encourages states to include similar conditions.
3. To what extent should states control subgrant details and monitor subgrants?
As the grantee, the state is responsible for ensuring that STOP funds are expended
appropriately and for the purposes mandated in the Violence Against Women Act. The state
is also responsible for establishing its own guidelines for subgrant oversight and monitoring
intensity. Monitoring must include: reviewing financial and programmatic reports; following
up and ensuring that the subgrantee takes appropriate action on any deficiencies noted during
audits, on-site reviews, and other means; and issuing a management decision for audit
findings pertaining to the STOP subgrant. States are required to assess the level of risk of
subgrantees and impose additional special conditions based on the level of risk. Depending
on the level of risk, these additional monitoring tools may be useful: providing subgrantees
with training and technical assistance, performing on site reviews of the subgrantee’s
program operations, and arranging for specific procedures to address risk. States should
consider taking enforcement actions against noncompliant subgrantees. For additional
information on requirements for pass-through entities (i.e., states), please see 2 CFR
§200.331.
4. Can states look at client records in monitoring subgrants?
The Violence Against Women Act confidentiality provision provides that grantees may not
share identifying information about clients served unless the client signs an informed, time-
limited release, or there is a statutory or court mandate for the release. The nature of
identifying information is fact-specific and could include things like age, race, and number of
children, depending on the situation. This means that states need to find ways to monitor
subgrantees without looking at identifying information. For example, a state could ask a
subgrantee to redact the identifying information from a sample of files.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
24
5. What is the difference between a subgrant and a contract?
A subgrant, or subaward, is for the purpose of carrying out the federal award and creates a
federal assistance relationship with the subrecipent. A subgrant is generally for the purpose
specified in the authorizing program statute as opposed to providing goods or services for the
benefit of the state. In determining whether a particular relationship is a contract or subgrant,
the substance of the relationship is more important than the form. See 2 CFR ance of the
relationship is more importsubrecipient and contractor determinations.
6. What information is required in a subgrant?
Subgrants must include the following information:
 Subgrantee name (which must match the name associated with its unique entity
identifier)
 Subgrantee’s unique entity identifier
 Federal Award Identification Number
 Federal Award Date
 Subgrant period of performance start and end date
 Amount of federal funds obligated by this action
 Total amount of federal funds obligated to the subrecipient
 Total amount of the federal award
 Federal award project description
 Name of federal awarding agency, state agency, and contact information of state
awarding official
 CFDA number and name for the grant program
 Indirect cost rate for the federal award (including if the de minimis rate is charged)
 All requirements imposed by the state on the subgrantee so that the federal award is
used in accordance with federal statutes and regulations and the terms and conditions
of the federal award
 Any additional requirements that the state imposes on the subgrantee to meet its own
responsibility to OVW, including identification of any required financial and
performance reports
 An approved federally recognized indirect cost rate if the subgrantee has one, a rate
negotiated between the state and the subgrantee, or a de minimus indirect cost rate
(see 2 CFR 200.414)
 A requirement that the subgrantee permit the state administrator and auditors to have
access to records and financial statements
 Appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subgrant

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
25
VAWA 2013 QUESTIONS
1. When do the changes in VAWA 2013 take effect?
The changes take effect with FY 2014 STOP awards.
2. What purpose areas did VAWA 2013 add to the STOP Program?
VAWA 2013 added the following purpose areas:
(14) developing and promoting state, local, or tribal legislation and policies that
enhance best practices for responding to domestic violence, dating violence,
sexual assault, and stalking;
(15) developing, implementing, or enhancing Sexual Assault Response Teams, or
other similar coordinated community responses to sexual assault;
(16) developing and strengthening policies, protocols, best practices, and training for
law enforcement agencies and prosecutors relating to the investigation and
prosecution of sexual assault cases and the appropriate treatment of victims;
(17) developing, enlarging, or strengthening programs addressing sexual assault
against men, women, and youth in correctional and detention settings;
(18) identifying and conducting inventories of backlogs of sexual assault evidence
collection kits and developing protocols and policies for responding to and
addressing such backlogs, including protocols and policies for notifying and
involving victims;
(19) developing, enlarging, or strengthening programs and projects to provide services
and responses targeting male and female victims of domestic violence, dating
violence, sexual assault, or stalking, whose ability to access traditional services
and responses is affected by their sexual orientation or gender identity, as defined
in section 249(c) of title 18, United States Code; and
(20) developing, enhancing, or strengthening prevention and educational programming
to address domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking, with not
more than 5 percent of the amount allocated to a state to be used for this purpose.
3. What changes were made to the rape exam payment certification?
Two substantive changes were made to the rape exam payment certification. First, states
need to coordinate with health care providers in the region to notify victims of sexual assault
of the availability of rape exams at no cost to the victims. Second, states no longer have the
option of reimbursing the victim for the out-of-pocket costs for the exams: they must provide
the exams free of cost to the victim or arrange for victims to obtain the exams free of charge
to the victim.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
26
4. Can states still require, or ask, victims to submit charges for the exams to their personal
insurance providers?
Yes, states can still require, or ask, victims to submit the charges for the exams to their health
insurance. However, under the new provisions, they must ensure that victims are not billed
any costs for co-payments or deductibles, but must ensure that such costs are billed to
whatever government entity is responsible for payment for the exams.
5. What does it mean to “coordinate with health care providers in the region to notify
victims of sexual assault of the availability of rape exams at no cost to the victims?”
The specifics will vary for each state and territory according to the needs and plans of that
state or territory, but the underlying purpose is to ensure the broadest possible notification of
victims of how to get a forensic exam. Examples of collaborating partners for distribution of
notice might include state hospital associations, state medical associations, state nursing
associations, Indian Health Services, and the state insurance commission. States should
choose their partners so as to notify the broadest range of possible providers.
6. When do states need to be in compliance with the revised rape exam payment
certification?
States have until March 7, 2016, to comply.
7. What changes were made to the fees and costs certification?
The fees and costs provision now includes felony and misdemeanor dating violence, sexual
assault, and stalking offenses. It also includes fees in connection with modification,
enforcement, dismissal, or withdrawal or a protection order, and it includes protection orders
to protect victims of dating violence. Please see question17, under Certification Questions,
for the full text of the fees and costs certification.
8. When do states need to be in compliance with the revised fees and costs certification?
States need to be in compliance with the revisions to the fees and costs certification by the
period ending on the date on which the next session of the state legislature ends, starting
from October 1, 2013.
9. What is the new sexual assault set aside requirement?
The new requirement is that “not less than 20 percent of the total amount granted to a state
under this subchapter shall be allocated to programs or projects in 2 or more allocations

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
27
[victim services, courts, law enforcement, or prosecution] that meaningfully address sexual
assault, including stranger rape, acquaintance rape, alcohol or drug-facilitated rape, and rape
within the context of an intimate partner relationship.”
10. What is the compliance deadline for the new sexual assault set aside?
States had until March 7, 2015, to implement the sexual assault set aside. Any funds that
were not obligated by this date are subject to the set aside.
11. How can states ensure that the projects funded under the set aside “meaningfully”
address sexual assault?
OVW encourages states to work closely with sexual assault coalitions and service providers
in each state to help ensure that programs “meaningfully” address sexual assault. Such
coalitions and service providers can provide assistance like staff and peer reviewer training,
language for solicitations, and insight into interventions that successfully respond to the
unique needs of sexual assault survivors. It is important to only count subgrants toward the
set aside that are truly dedicated to sexually assault, rather than subgrants that are really more
focused on domestic violence and have added sexual assault without having a substantive
understanding of the issue. OVW has experienced this in administering discretionary
programs with sexual assault set asides. OVW encourages states to assess the extent to
which existing subgrantees are addressing sexual assault through the subgrantee reporting
system.
12. What changes did VAWA 2013 make to the implementation planning process?
There have been many changes to the implementation planning process:
 The implementation plan is due with the application.
 There is a new list of entities which must be consulted and coordinated with (see
question 14 for the specific list).
 The plan needs to be coordinated with the state plan for the Family Violence
Prevention and Services Act and the programs under the Victims of Crime Act and
Rape Prevention Education (see question 13 for additional information).
 The plan needs to address the 20 percent sexual assault set aside (see questions 9-11).
 The plan needs to include documentation from the required planning committee
members as to their participation in the planning process (see question 15).
 The plan needs to include documentation from the prosecution, law enforcement,
court, and victim services programs to be assisted describing the need for the grant
funds, the intended use of the grant funds, the expected result of the grant funds, and
the demographic characteristics of the population to be served, including age,
disability, race, ethnicity, and language background. This is not a new requirement,
but it used to be part of the application rather than the implementation plan. This can

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
28
still take the form of letters from each of the four listed categories— either from
current grantees or from statewide organizations representing the category of grantee
(for example a state law enforcement or prosecutors association) that can comment on
the need for grant funds and the other required information.
 The plan needs to include a description of how the state will ensure that subgrantees
will consult with victim service providers during the course of developing their grant
applications in order to ensure that the proposed activities are designed to promote the
safety, confidentiality, and economic independence of victims. This is similar to a
requirement that was previously part of the application. Prior to VAWA 2013, states
were required to provide letters on how the subgrantees already had consulted with
victim service provider. Now the state is required to provide descriptive information
on how it will ensure that the subgrantees will consult with victim service providers.
For example, states could describe whether they will require letters of support or
memoranda of understanding as part of the subgrant applications to demonstrate such
consultation.
 The plan needs to include demographic data on the distribution of underserved
populations within the state and a description of how the state will meet the needs of
underserved populations, including the minimum allocation for culturally specific
services.
 The plan needs to include information on how the state will meet the requirements to
give priority to areas of varying geographic size with the greatest showing of need
based on the availability of existing domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault
and stalking programs; determine the amount of subgrants based on the population
and geographic area to be served; equitably distribute monies on a geographic basis
including nonurban and rural areas of various geographic sizes; and recognize and
meaningfully respond to the needs of underserved populations and ensure that monies
set aside to fund culturally specific services and activities for underserved populations
are distributed equitably among those populations.
 The plan needs to include goals and objectives for reducing domestic violence-related
homicides within the state (see question 19).
13. How should states coordinate their implementation plans with the state plans for the
Family Violence Prevention and Services Act and the Victims of Crime Act and Rape
Prevention Education Programs? How will states be expected to document this
coordination?
The purposes of this coordination process are to provide greater diversity of projects funded
and leverage efforts under the various funding streams. Because states structure these
programs differently and house them in different offices, there is no single way to meet the
requirement. Options to meet the requirement include convening a meeting of the various
program administrators to discuss the different plans and priorities, having a shared
implementation planning process or meeting, having the different program administrators
attend each other’s implementation planning meetings, reading and commenting on each of
the other plans, and sharing the STOP plan with the administrators for the other programs for
their feedback on how it complements their programs. It may be possible to combine the

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
29
plans, as long as the required elements for each are addressed. OVW hopes a side benefit of
improved coordination might be more consistent policy in overall administration of the
programs, such as coordinated terms and conditions or monitoring. States will be required to
include in their implementation plans information on the process for how they are
coordinating their plans and the impact of that process on the contents of the plans.
14. What entities must states consult and coordinate with in developing their
implementation plans?
States must consult and coordinate with the following entities in developing their
implementation plans:
 The state sexual assault coalition
 The state domestic violence coalition
 The law enforcement entities within the state
 Prosecution offices
 State and local courts
 All state and federally recognized tribal governments in the state
 Representatives from underserved populations, including culturally specific
populations
 Victim service providers
 Population specific organizations
15. Are all collaborating partners members of the “planning committee?”
No. By statute, states must consult and coordinate with the state domestic violence and
sexual assault coalitions, law enforcement, prosecution, courts, tribal governments,
representatives from underserved populations, including culturally specific populations,
victim service providers, and population specific organizations. The state must have
meaningful consultation with all the entities on the above list, but they do not all need to be
on the “planning committee.” For example, states need to consult with all state and federally
recognized tribes in their state, but for the planning committee they could include
representatives from a smaller number of tribes, tribal organizations, or tribal coalitions.
Specifically, the planning committee must include at a minimum:
 The state domestic violence and sexual assault coalitions as defined by 42 U.S.C.
13925(a)(32) and (33) (or dual coalition)
 A law enforcement entity or state law enforcement organization
 A prosecution entity or state prosecution organization
 A court or the state administrative office of the courts
 Representatives from tribes, tribal organizations, or tribal coalitions
 Population specific organizations representing the most significant underserved
populations and culturally specific populations in the state- in addition to tribes,
which are addressed separately

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
30
The full consultation process should include more robust representation from each of the
required groups (as provided in question 14, above).
16. How will states be expected to provide “documentation from each member of the
planning committee as to their participation in the planning process?”
The grantee must submit a form documenting the type and extent of each member’s
participation in the planning process, as well as major issues that were raised during the
process and how they were resolved. Specifically, states can accomplish this in the following
manner:
First, the state/territory should retain documentation regarding attendees at all planning
meetings. The type of documentation for meetings depends on the form of the meeting:
 For in-person meetings: use and retain a sign-in sheet with name, title, organization,
which of the required entity types (e.g., tribal government, population specific
organization, prosecution, courts, state coalition) the person is representing, phone
number, email address, and signature
 For phone or online meetings: attendees should “sign-in” by emailing or faxing that
they are on the call and administrators should retain these emails and/or faxes
Second, the STOP state administrator should create a summary of major concerns that are
raised during the development process and how they are addressed, or why they are not
addressed. This should be sent to the planning committee along with any draft
implementation plan and with the final plan.
Third, the state should also keep track of any method of document review that occurred
outside the context of a meeting, i.e., the state should record who the draft implementation
plan was sent to, how it was sent (for example by email versus mail), and who responded.
Although states/territories do not need to note every comment and how it was addressed, if
there are serious or significant concerns with the draft implementation plan, these should be
added to the summary of major concerns described above. For remote areas with limited
internet connectivity, it may be necessary to consider blast faxes as a way to reach groups
such as tribes and population specific organizations.
Finally, the state/territory must create and submit to OVW a checklist for each participant
that documents, at a minimum, whether they were informed of meetings, whether they
attended meetings, whether they were given drafts of the implementation plan to review,
whether they submitted comments on the draft, and whether they received a copy of the final
plan and the STOP state administrator’s summary of major concerns. The checklist should
also include space for participants to include any major concerns that they have with the final
plan. Each participant should check the appropriate categories on the checklist, sign the
form, and return it to the STOP state administrator, who will attach the checklists to the plan
when submitting the plan to OVW.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
31
States should ensure that committee members are sent the final version of the plan, after any
necessary state approvals.
Only the checklists will need to be sent to OVW with the implementation plans. The
remaining documentation described above should be kept on file.
17. What documentation should states provide for entities that were consulted but were not
part of the formal planning committee?
States should submit proof that they consulted all of the required entities. For consultation
by mail or email, states should submit a copy of the letter or email and the list of who it was
sent to, including the type of entity. For consultation by phone, the state should submit a
copy of the invitation, a list of who was invited, and a copy of the meeting agenda. States
should keep records of, but do not need to send, the specific comments received by any
consulting parties.
18. What does it mean to consult with tribes? Does it need to include all the tribes in states
with significant numbers of tribes?
All state and federally recognized tribes should be invited to the table. This could mean that
they are sent a written document (which can be via email) to comment on or that they are
invited to a meeting or conference call. Regardless of format, states should make sure to give
sufficient notice to tribes and should keep records of who was invited, how they were invited
(e.g., email), and whether and how they participated. Many states have intertribal councils,
or related groups which can facilitate communication with the tribes in the state.
19. What do states need to do to “provide goals and objectives for reducing domestic
violence-related homicides” in their implementation plans?
First, states need to provide whatever statistics are available on the rates of domestic violence
homicides within their states. As part of their consultation with law enforcement,
prosecution, and victim services, they should discuss and document the perceived accuracy
of these statistics and the best ways to address domestic violence homicide. The plan should
identify specific goals and objectives for reducing domestic violence homicide, based on
these discussions, which includes challenges specific to the state and how the plan can
overcome them. For example, the state should identify which priority areas, projects, or
technical assistance they are including with a purpose of reducing domestic violence
homicides. In plans subsequent to the 2014 plan, they should include any changes in the
statistics since the previous plan.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
32
20. When is the implementation plan due?
It is due with the application.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
33
CERTIFICATION QUESTIONS
A. Judicial Notification
1. Does the Judicial Notification certification apply to local courts not under the control of
the state courts?
The state certification does not need to cover local courts not under the control of the state
courts. However, if a local court seeks STOP Program funding, then it should provide such a
certification to the state as a condition of receiving the subgrant.
2. Under the Judicial Notice certification, would a state be in compliance if the notice is
provided by law enforcement through the incident report, rather than through the
courts?
No. This would not qualify as “judicial” notice.
B. Forensic Examinations
3. What is required by the state to comply with the forensic examination certification?
Under 42 U.S.C. § 3796gg-4, a state is not entitled to funds under the STOP Program unless
the state or another governmental entity “incurs the full out-of-pocket cost of forensic
medical exams. . . for victims of sexual assault” and “coordinates with health care providers
in the region to notify victims of sexual assault of the availability of rape exams at no costs to
the victims.” In addition, a state must comply with this requirement without regard to
whether the victim cooperates in the criminal justice system or cooperates with law
enforcement.
4. What is a "forensic medical exam?"
The term "forensic medical exam" means an examination provided to a sexual assault victim
by medical personnel trained to gather evidence of a sexual assault in a manner suitable for
use in a court of law.
The examination should include at a minimum:
(A) examination of physical trauma;
(B) determination of penetration or force;
(C) patient interview; and
(D) collection and evaluation of evidence.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
34
The inclusion of additional procedures (e.g., testing for sexually transmitted diseases) to
obtain evidence or provide treatment may be determined by the state in accordance with its
current laws, policies, and practices.
5. What does a state have to do to "incur the full out-of-pocket cost" of forensic medical
exams?
A state shall be deemed to incur the full out-of-pocket cost of forensic medical exams for
victims of sexual assault if any government entity:
(A) provides such exams to victims free of charge to victims; or
(B) arranges for victims to obtain such exams free of charge to the victims.
6. What is the definition of "full out-of-pocket costs?"
"Full out-of-pocket costs" means any expense that may be charged to a victim in connection
with a forensic medical examination for the purpose of gathering evidence of a sexual assault
(e.g., the full cost of the examination, an insurance deductible, or a fee established by the
facility conducting the examination). For individuals covered by insurance, "full out-of-
pocket costs" means any costs that the insurer does not pay. However, as described below
and above, if the state wishes to use STOP funds to pay for the exams, it may not require
victims to seek reimbursement from their private health insurance.
7. Can STOP funds be used to pay for a health care provider’s time conducting forensic
examinations?
Yes. Starting with FY 2007, STOP funds may be used for health care providers’ time
conducting forensic examinations, if two requirements are met:
(1) the examinations are performed by specially trained examiners for victims of sexual
assault (such as Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners (SANEs) or Sexual Assault
Forensic Examiners (SAFEs)); and
(2) the jurisdiction does not require victims of sexual assault to seek reimbursement from
their insurance carriers.
8. Can STOP Program funds pay for other aspects of SANE/SAFE programs even if the
two above requirements are not met?
Yes. STOP Program funds may support the following activities related to SANE/SAFE
programs even if the requirements for paying personnel costs are not met:
 training for SANE/SAFE personnel

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
35
 expert testimony of SANE/SAFE personnel
 forensic evidence collection kits ("rape kits")
 equipment, such as colposcopes, swab dryers, and lights
 outreach efforts to inform victims about available services
 victim advocate personnel to accompany victims through the forensic examination
process
 on-going counseling services for victims
 on-call time of the SANE/SAFE personnel
This list of SANE/SAFE activities that may be funded is not comprehensive and other similar
activities may be funded. Please contact the state’s grant program specialist with questions.
9. What if the hospital charges a fee for the use of the examination room?
If the hospital or other medical facility charges a fee for the use of the examination room, it is
considered part of the exam and must be paid by the state or other governmental entity.
10. Can the state require victims to submit the claims for the cost of the exam to their
personal health insurance providers?
Yes, if they are not using STOP Program funds to pay for the cost of the forensic exam.
Under the definition of "full out-of-pocket costs," states can require that victims submit
claims to their personal insurers. However, any expenses not covered by the insurer must be
covered by the state or other governmental entity and cannot be billed to the victim. This
includes any deductibles or denial of claims by the insurer. OVW urges states to keep in
mind that, in some cases, insurance billing can present a hardship for victims. For example, a
victim of spousal rape may not want her husband to find out that she got a forensic exam. If
the victim is forced to submit the claim to her insurance company and she is on her
husband’s insurance, he may receive a statement from the insurance indicating that she got
the exam. For this reason, OVW strongly encourages states to not require victims to file a
claim with their insurers.
11. Are states permitted to require victims to cooperate with law enforcement as a
condition for receiving a free exam?
No. Effective January 5, 2009, a state will not be in compliance with this provision and will
be ineligible for STOP Program funds if the victim is required to cooperate with law
enforcement or participate in the criminal justice system in order to receive an exam,
payment for the exam, or both. Some victims are unable or unready to decide whether they
want to cooperate with law enforcement in the immediate aftermath of the assault. Because
evidence is lost as time progresses, such victims should be encouraged to have the evidence
collected immediately and decide about reporting the crime at a later date. If local
jurisdictions have policies or practices that require victim cooperation or participation in

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
36
order to receive an exam or pay for the exam, the state is responsible for ensuring that all
victims are able to receive free exams, regardless whether they cooperate with law
enforcement or participate in the criminal justice system.
12. Can a state set a limit on the cost of the exam?
Yes, the state may set a rate for the cost of an exam. However, states should be cautious that
they do not set the rate so low that no facilities are willing to provide exams.
13. Can a state use its Crime Victims Compensation Fund to pay for the forensic exams?
Yes, if state law designates the victim compensation program as the primary paying source
for the exams. In many states, the compensation program is the primary payer under state
law. For federal guidelines that apply to the Victims of Crime Act Victim Compensation
Grant Program, go to www.ovc.gov/voca/pdftxt/voca_guidelines2001.pdf . If the state has
further questions about the use of crime victim compensation funding for forensic exam
payment, please contact the Office for Victims of Crime at (202) 307-5983.
14. Under the forensic exam certification, is the state required to provide exams for victims
of child sexual abuse?
The certification applies only to adult and youth victims of sexual assault.
15. What should states do when the victim is raped in one state but gets the medical
forensic exam in another?
Some states have laws or policies such that they only pay for forensic exams if the rape took
place in the state. Others will only pay if the exam took place in the state. Thus, if the victim
gets the exam in state A but was raped in state B, state A may refuse to pay on the grounds
that the rape did not occur in their state. State B may refuse to pay because the exam did not
take place there. States in such situations need to work together to ensure that the victim is
not billed for any out of pocket costs.
C. Fees and Costs
16. What grant programs are affected by the “fees and costs” certification?
This requirement applies to grantees under the STOP
(Services*Training*Officers*Prosecutors) Violence Against Women Formula Grants (STOP)
and Grants to Encourage Arrest Policies and Enforcement of Protection Orders (Arrest)
Programs.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
37
17. Who is affected by the “fees and costs” certification?
States, Indian tribal governments, units of local government, and state and local courts that
apply for funding under the STOP or Arrest Programs are affected.
18. What is required to comply with the “fees and costs” certification?
Applicants for these programs must certify that:
[Their] laws, policies, and practices do not require, in connection with the prosecution of
any misdemeanor or felony domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking
offense, or in connection with the filing, issuance, registration, modification,
enforcement, dismissal, withdrawal or service of a protection order, or a petition for a
protection order, to protect a victim of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault,
or stalking, that the victim bear the costs associated with the filing of criminal charges
against the offender, or the costs associated with the filing, issuance, registration,
modification, enforcement, dismissal, withdrawal or service of a warrant, protection
order, petition for a protection order, or witness subpoena, whether issued inside or
outside the state, tribal, or local jurisdiction.
This certification shall be treated as a material representation of fact upon which the
Department of Justice will rely when it determines whether to award the grant.
19. Do applicants need to change their statutes to come into compliance with the “fees and
costs” certification?
If the laws of the state, tribe, or unit of local government conflict with the “fees and costs”
provision, then the applicant will not be able to make the necessary certification, even if the
jurisdiction has a policy of never charging fees.
20. What if an applicant’s statute is silent on the issue of fees?
If the statute is silent on the issue of fees, then the applicant may not need to pass a law
because the policy does not need to be expressed in a law. However, the applicant will need
to ensure that its policies and practices do not require victims to bear any of the relevant
costs. We encourage applicants to pass a law or adopt a written policy to ensure that victims
are not required to bear these costs.
21. As a policy matter, why is it important to comply with this requirement?
This provision is designed to ensure that jurisdictions are not forcing victims to bear costs
related to criminal and civil domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
38
cases. The intent of the statutory language is to ensure that all victims can access legal relief
in the civil and criminal justice systems, regardless of their financial circumstances.
22. Can grant funds be used to cover these fees and costs?
No, grantees cannot use grant funds to cover these fees and costs. Such use of grant funds
would not comply with the certification because grantees are not entitled to funds unless they
first certify that they have met (or will meet in certain cases as described in the answer
regarding timing of compliance above) the filing fee requirement. This certification is a
prerequisite for receiving grant funds. Program funds may not be used to pay these fees and
costs, as Congress instructed grantees to certify that victims are not bearing these costs prior
to receiving grant funds.
23. Can the respondent or defendant be charged fees in connection with protection orders
or criminal cases?
There is nothing in the STOP or Arrest Program statutes to prevent jurisdictions from
charging respondents or defendants.
24. What if the state law provides that persons below a certain income can get a fee waiver?
Providing fee waivers only for victims below a certain income is not sufficient. The statutory
requirement applies to all victims, regardless of income.
25. Can victims be charged these fees if they are later reimbursed?
No. Charging victims up front and providing reimbursement also is not sufficient to meet the
statutory requirement. Even if victims are fully reimbursed, this would require victims to
“bear the cost” during the time from when they pay the fees until they receive the
reimbursement, which is not permitted by the statute.
26. What if the respondent, defendant, or subject of a warrant or witness subpoena lives
out of state? Who should pay the costs of service in such cases?
The statute specifies that the requirement applies whether the warrant, protection order,
petition for protection order, or witness subpoena is “issued inside or outside the state, tribal,
or local jurisdiction.” This makes clear that victims cannot be charged in such cases.
However, the statute does not specify which jurisdiction is required to cover the fees in such
a case.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
39
27. What types of protection orders are covered by the requirement?
The requirement specifically applies to an order “to protect a victim of domestic violence,
dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking.” This includes any civil order of any type or
duration so long as it was issued for the purpose of preventing violent or threatening acts or
harassment against, or contact or communication with or physical proximity to, another
person. This also includes orders issued by criminal courts, and pendente lite orders in other
proceedings, as described in 18 U.S.C. § 2266.
28. Can fees be charged for general protection orders such as “antiharassment” or “repeat
violence” orders?
If the person applying for the order is a victim of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual
assault, or stalking and is applying to get an order because of that crime, then the order would
constitute an order “to protect a victim of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault,
or stalking.” Jurisdictions may charge for general protection orders when the applicant is not
a victim of these crimes.
29. What if a victim of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking returns
to court to request a modification of a protection order?
“Modification” of orders is expressly covered by the certification, so the victim could not be
charged for this.
30. If the court denies a petition for an order, can the petitioner then be charged fees?
Possibly, depending on the specific circumstances of the case. It is possible that a court may
deny a protection order even though the petitioner is a victim of domestic violence, dating
violence, sexual assault, or stalking. For example, if the state law requires physical abuse to
have occurred within a certain time period, a victim could be denied an order because there
was not a recent enough incident of physical abuse. The petitioner may be charged fees if the
court makes a finding that the petitioner is not a victim of domestic violence, dating violence,
sexual assault, or stalking and denies the order based on that finding.
31. Can fees still be charged for divorce cases filed by victims of domestic violence, dating
violence, sexual assault or stalking?
The provision does not limit the ability of a jurisdiction to charge fees for divorce cases.
However, if a victim of domestic violence, sexual assault or stalking files for a protection
order within the divorce case, the victim cannot be charged fees associated with the
protection order.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
40
D. Polygraphing
32. Does the polygraph testing prohibition mean that victim polygraphs can never be used
in a sexual assault investigation?
The polygraph testing prohibition at 42 U.S.C. 3796gg-8 requires states to certify that their
laws, policies, or practices “will ensure that no law enforcement officer, prosecuting officer,
or other governmental official shall ask or require an adult, youth, or child victim of an
alleged sex offense…to submit to a polygraph examination or other truth telling device as a
condition for proceeding with the investigation for such an offense.”
This means that if the polygraph is not required and not a condition for the investigation, an
official may request or offer an opportunity to take a polygraph examination. Jurisdictions
should keep in mind however, that such “requests” may be inherently coercive to victims.
Also, such requests should only be made in extreme circumstances and with justification, not
as a routine matter. For example, the Attorney General Guidelines for Victim and Witness
Assistance provide that “Department personnel are strongly discouraged from asking sexual
assault victims to take polygraph examinations. The investigating agent may ask a sexual
assault victim to take a polygraph examination only in extraordinary circumstances and only
with the concurrence of a Special Agent in Charge or the Supervisory Assistant United States
Attorney. All reasonable alternative investigative methods should be exhausted before
requesting or administering a sexual assault victim polygraph examination.” Jurisdictions
that do not prohibit all polygraph examinations of victims should consider implementing
similar practices to ensure polygraph examinations are not misused.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT STOP FORMULA GRANTS
41
MISCELLANEOUS
1. Can universities be STOP subgrantees?
Yes, a university may be a STOP subgrantee if it meets STOP eligibility requirements and
program purposes.
2. Why is there a greater emphasis in the STOP Program on collaboration with nonprofit,
nongovernmental victim services programs than with law enforcement and
prosecution?
One of the fundamental purposes of VAWA is to give an equal voice to victim advocates in
establishing the priorities for funding within a state. Not all victims of violence against
women seek help from the criminal justice system; many instead turn to shelters, rape crisis
centers, and other programs for assistance.
3. Is it possible to change the project period or end date of the grant?
Yes. The state should contact its grant program specialist soon as possible so he/she can
explain how to submit a Grant Adjustment Notice (GAN) for this purpose. The state will
need to provide a justification for the change, including the amount of funds remaining in the
grant, the reasons why the funds have not been (or will not be) expended by the current end
date, and how the state plans to use the funds in the additional time period.
4. Is it possible change the project start date of the grant?
Yes, but only prior to the award being issued or in special circumstances after the award is
issued but prior to any funds being drawn down on the award. States must contact their
OVW grant manager to make the request.