CPG Sec 578.200 Corn Meal - Adulteration by Insect and Rodent Filth

us-fda-guidance-5aed6761fb1f9ded5cfe663fb62a5861CPG Sec 578.200 Corn Meal - Adulteration by Insect and Rodent FilthGuidance

Administrative guidance, not enacted legislation. This captured publisher edition preserves the listed document and attachments; later developments are not independently consolidated.

Issued by:
Guidance Issuing Office
Human Foods Program

Manual of Compliance Policy Guides Chapter 5 - Food, Colors, and Cosmetics

The following represents criteria for direct reference seizure *requests to the Office of Human and Animal Food Operations (OHAFO) in consultation with the Office of Enforcement and Import Operations (OEIO) and CFSAN, and for direct citation by the appropriate Field Office within the Human and Animal Food Program*:

1. Insects - The corn meal contains an average of 1 or more whole insects or equivalent/50 gms. (0.5 or more whole insects or equivalent/25 gms.);

or

2. Insect fragments - The corn meal contains an average of 25 or more insect fragments/25 gms.;

or

3. Rodent hair - The corn meal contains an average of 1 or more rodent hairs/25 gms.;

or

4. Rodent excreta - The corn meal contains an average of 1 or more rodent excreta fragments/50 gms.

SPECIMEN CHARGE:

*The article was adulterated (when introduced into) (while in) (while held for sale after shipment in) interstate commerce within meaning of 21 U.S.C. 342(a)(3), in that it consists in part of a filthy substance by reason of the presence therein of insects, insect fragments, rodent hairs, and rodent excreta fragments, as applicable.

NOTES:

1. If the evidence establishes that the article became adulterated after receipt in interstate commerce, then charge only that the article "is adulterated while held for sale after shipment in interstate commerce"

2. If the evidence does not establish where the article became adulterated and the violation is such that it could have occurred anywhere, i.e. it is not a manufacturing defect, then charge only that the article "is adulterated while held for sale after shipment in interstate commerce."*

*Material between asterisks is new or revised.*

Issued: 10/11/79 Revised: 10/1/80, 6/6/88


Submit Comments

Submit comments on this guidance document electronically via docket ID: FDA-2013-S-0610 - Specific Electronic Submissions Intended For FDA's Dockets Management Staff (i.e., Citizen Petitions, Draft Proposed Guidance Documents, Variances, and other administrative record submissions)

If unable to submit comments online, please mail written comments to:

Dockets Management
Food and Drug Administration
5630 Fishers Lane, Rm 1061
Rockville, MD 20852

All comments should be identified with the title of the guidance.

CPG Sec. 578.200 Corn Meal - Adulteration by
Insect and Rodent Filth
REGULATORY ACTION GUIDANCE:
The following represents criteria for direct reference seizure *requests to the Office of Human
and Animal Food Operations (OHAFO) in consultation with the Office of Enforcement and
Import Operations (OEIO) and CFSAN, and for direct citation by the appropriate Field Office
within the Human and Animal Food Program*:
1. 	Insects - The corn meal contains an average of 1 or more whole insects or equivalent/50
gms. (0.5 or more whole insects or equivalent/25 gms.);
or
2. 	Insect fragments - The corn meal contains an average of 25 or more insect fragments/25
gms.;
or
3. 	Rodent hair - The corn meal contains an average of 1 or more rodent hairs/25 gms.;
or
4. 	Rodent excreta - The corn meal contains an average of 1 or more rodent excreta
fragments/50 gms.
SPECIMEN CHARGE:
*The article was adulterated (when introduced into) (while in) (while held for sale after shipment
in) interstate commerce within meaning of 21 U.S.C. 342(a)(3), in that it consists in part of a
filthy substance by reason of the presence therein of insects, insect fragments, rodent hairs, and
rodent excreta fragments, as applicable.
NOTES:
1. 	If the evidence establishes that the article became adulterated after receipt in interstate
commerce, then charge only that the article "is adulterated while held for sale after
shipment in interstate commerce"
2. 	If the evidence does not establish where the article became adulterated and the violation
is such that it could have occurred anywhere, i.e. it is not a manufacturing defect, then
charge only that the article "is adulterated while held for sale after shipment in interstate
commerce."*
*Material between asterisks is new or revised.*
Issued: 10/11/79
Revised: 10/1/80, 6/6/88

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.