Same Surgical Procedure Exception under 21 CFR 1271.15(b): Questions and Answers Regarding the Scope of the Exception

us-fda-guidance-8005ff3954824bd46f4a452cf2e5398bSame Surgical Procedure Exception under 21 CFR 1271.15(b): Questions and Answers Regarding the Scope of the ExceptionGuidance

Administrative guidance, not enacted legislation. This captured publisher edition preserves the listed document and attachments; later developments are not independently consolidated.

Docket Number:
FDA-2014-D-1584
Issued by:
Guidance Issuing Office
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research

We, the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER)1 at the FDA, are issuing this guidance to provide you, tissue establishments and healthcare professionals, with our current thinking on the scope of the exception set forth in Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 1271, specifically the exception set forth in 21 CFR 1271.15(b). This guidance does not address the other exceptions in 21 CFR 1271.15. This guidance, presented in question and answer format, provides our current interpretation of this regulation and includes examples based on inquiries received by the Agency since the final rule, “Human Cells, Tissues, and Cellular and Tissue Based Products; Establishment Registration and Listing” (Establishment Registration and Listing final rule) was published on January 19, 2001 (66 FR 5447).


Submit Comments

You can submit online or written comments on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR 10.115(g)(5))

If unable to submit comments online, please mail written comments to:

Dockets Management
Food and Drug Administration
5630 Fishers Lane, Rm 1061
Rockville, MD 20852

All written comments should be identified with this document's docket number: FDA-2014-D-1584.

Questions?

Same Surgical Procedure Exception
under 21 CFR 1271.15(b): Questions
and Answers Regarding the Scope of
the Exception
Guidance for Industry
Additional copies of this guidance are available from the Office of Communication, Outreach,
and Development (OCOD), 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Bldg. 71, Rm. 3128, Silver Spring,
MD 20993-0002 or by calling 1-800-835-4709 or 240-402-8010, or email ocod@fda.hhs.gov, or
from the Internet at
https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guid
ances/default.htm.
For questions on the content of this guidance, contact OCOD at the phone numbers or email
address listed above.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Food and Drug Administration
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research
November 2017
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
i
Table of Contents
I. 	INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1
II. 	BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................... 2
III. 	QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ....................................................................................... 4
Q1: 	What is the relationship between the exception in 21 CFR 1271.15(b) and the
four criteria described in 21 CFR 1271.10(a)? ................................................... 4
Q2: 	When does the exception in 21 CFR 1271.15(b) apply? .................................... 4
Q3: 	Section 1271.15(b) refers to implanting “such HCT/P.” What is meant by
“such HCT/P”?...................................................................................................... 5
Q4: 	What is autologous use? ....................................................................................... 5
Q5: 	Section 1271.15(b) refers to same surgical procedure. What types of
procedures are considered the same surgical procedures? ............................... 5
Q6: 	Are there any types of procedures consisting of more than a single operation
that are considered same surgical procedure for purposes of the exception in
21 CFR 1271.15(b)? .............................................................................................. 5
Q7: 	Can an establishment that processes an autologous HCT/P after removal and
prior to implantation still qualify for the exception in 21 CFR 1271.15(b)? ... 7
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
1
Same Surgical Procedure Exception under 21 CFR 1271.15(b):
Questions and Answers Regarding the Scope of the Exception
Guidance for Industry
This guidance represents the current thinking of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA or
Agency) on this topic. It does not establish any rights for any person and is not binding on FDA
or the public. You can use an alternative approach if it satisfies the requirements of the
applicable statutes and regulations. To discuss an alternative approach, contact the FDA staff
responsible for this guidance as listed on the title page.
I. 	INTRODUCTION
We, the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER)1 at the FDA, are issuing this
guidance to provide you, tissue establishments and healthcare professionals, with our current
thinking on the scope of the exception set forth in Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) Part 1271, specifically the exception set forth in 21 CFR 1271.15(b). This guidance does
not address the other exceptions in 21 CFR 1271.15.
This guidance, presented in question and answer format, provides our current interpretation of
this regulation and includes examples based on inquiries received by the Agency since the final
rule, “Human Cells, Tissues, and Cellular and Tissue Based Products; Establishment Registration
and Listing” (Establishment Registration and Listing final rule) was published on January 19,
2001 (66 FR 5447).
This guidance finalizes the draft guidance of the same title dated October 2014. This guidance
also finalizes certain material related to adipose tissue that was included in the draft guidance
entitled “Human Cells, Tissues, and Cellular and Tissue-Based Products (HCT/Ps) from Adipose
Tissue: Regulatory Considerations; Draft Guidance for Industry” dated December 2014
(Adipose Draft Guidance). These material, together with the material related to adipose tissue
included in the final guidance entitled “Regulatory Considerations for Human Cell, Tissues, and
Cellular and Tissue-Based Products: Minimal Manipulation and Homologous Use; Guidance for
Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff” dated November 2017, supersedes the
Adipose Draft Guidance. Accordingly, we do not intend to finalize the Adipose Draft Guidance
which is now withdrawn.
1 This guidance has been prepared by CBER in cooperation with the Center for Devices and Radiological Health
(CDRH), and the Office of Combination Products (OCP) at the Food and Drug Administration.
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
2
FDA’s guidance documents, including this guidance, do not establish legally enforceable
responsibilities. Instead, guidances describe the FDA’s current thinking on a topic and should be
viewed only as recommendations, unless specific regulatory or statutory requirements are cited.
The use of the word should in FDA’s guidances means that something is suggested or
recommended, but not required.
II. 	BACKGROUND
HCT/Ps are defined in 21 CFR 1271.3(d) as articles containing or consisting of human cells or
tissues that are intended for implantation, transplantation, infusion, or transfer into a human
recipient.2 Under the authority of section 361 of the Public Health Service (PHS) Act, FDA
established regulations for HCT/Ps to prevent the introduction, transmission, and spread of
communicable diseases. These regulations can be found in 21 CFR Part 1271 (Part 1271).
Under certain circumstances, an establishment may qualify for an exception from the
requirements under Part 1271. These circumstances are set out in 21 CFR 1271.15, including the
exception in 21 CFR 1271.15(b) that is the subject of this guidance. Section 1271.15(b)
provides: “You are not required to comply with the requirements of this Part if you are an
establishment that removes HCT/Ps from an individual and implants such HCT/Ps into the same
individual during the same surgical procedure.”
On February 28, 1997, we addressed this exception in the document entitled, “Proposed
Approach to Regulation of Cellular and Tissue-Based Products.”3 In explaining our proposed
approach for regulating human cellular and tissue-based products, we stated that:
The agency would not assert any regulatory control over cells or tissues that are
removed from a patient and transplanted back into that patient during a single
surgical procedure. The communicable disease risks, as well as the safety and
2 Examples of HCT/Ps include, but are not limited to, bone, ligament, skin, dura mater, heart valve, cornea,
hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells derived from peripheral and cord blood, manipulated autologous chondrocytes,
epithelial cells on a synthetic matrix, and semen or other reproductive tissue. The following articles are not
considered HCT/Ps: (1) Vascularized human organs for transplantation; (2) Whole Blood or blood components or
blood derivative products subject to listing under 21 CFR Parts 607 and 207, respectively; (3) Secreted or extracted
human products, such as milk, collagen, and cell factors, except that semen is considered an HCT/P; (4) Minimally
manipulated bone marrow for homologous use and not combined with another article (except for water, crystalloids,
or a sterilizing, preserving, or storage agent, if the addition of the agent does not raise new clinical safety concerns
with respect to the bone marrow); (5) Ancillary products used in the manufacture of HCT/P; (6) Cells, tissues, and
organs derived from animals other than humans; (7) In vitro diagnostic products as defined in 21 CFR 809.3(a); and
(8) Blood vessels recovered with an organ, as defined in 42 CFR 121.2 that are intended for use in organ
transplantation and labeled “For use in organ transplantation only.” (21 CFR 1271.3(d)).
Please note, the regulatory status of products identified as not being HCT/Ps is beyond the scope of this guidance.
3 “Proposed Approach to Regulation of Cellular and Tissue-Based Products,” (1997 Proposed Approach) dated
February 28, 1997; (62 FR 9721; March 4, 1997) page 12.
https://www.fda.gov/downloads/biologicsbloodvaccines/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/tissue
/ucm062601.pdf.
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
3
effectiveness risks, would generally be no different than those typically associated
with surgery.
Subsequently, in the Federal Register of May 14, 1998 (63 FR 26744), we published a proposed
rule “Establishment Registration and Listing for Manufacturers of Human Cellular and Tissue-
Based Products” that proposed to require establishments that manufacture human cellular or
tissue-based products that meet certain criteria to register and list with the Agency. In describing
which establishments are required to register and list, we stated that:
“An establishment or person that removes human cellular or tissue-based products
from an individual and then implants, transplants, infuses or transfers those cells
or tissues into the same individual is not required to register or list with the
agency, so long as the human cellular or tissue-based product is quarantined
pending completion of the surgery.” (63 FR 26744 at 26748)
In the preamble to the Establishment Registration and Listing final rule, with respect to the
exception in 21 CFR 1271.15(b), we reported that we had received one comment on the
proposed exception. We also reported that the comment assumed that hospitals retaining
autologous tissue, not used in a scheduled surgical procedure, to be used in a subsequent
application on the same patient, are exempt from registration and listing because the two
applications are essentially a single continuous procedure.
In response to that comment, we stated the following:
“We agree that, so long as the hospital does not engage in any other activity
encompassed with in [sic] the definition of “manufacture,” the hospital would not
be required to register or comply with the other provisions to be codified in Part
1271. For example, if the hospital expanded the cells or tissues, it would not meet
the terms of the exception. In reaching this conclusion, we note that hospitals that
store autologous cells or tissues for subsequent application in the same patient
must follow the guidelines of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of
Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO)4 for tissue storage, monitoring of storage
devices, and tracking in order to obtain or maintain accreditation.”
(66 FR 5447 at 5460)
In sum, FDA’s view is that autologous cells or tissues that are removed from an individual and
implanted into the same individual without intervening processing steps beyond rinsing,
cleansing, sizing, or shaping, raise no additional risks of contamination and communicable
disease transmission beyond that typically associated with surgery. FDA considers the same
surgical procedure exception to be a narrow exception to regulation under Part 1271.
4 For the purposes of making a determination as to whether an establishment meets the exception in
21 CFR 1271.15(b), FDA does not take into account whether an establishment is accredited by a particular
organization. Reference to the JCAHO (now The Joint Commission) was intended to serve as an example.
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
4
III. 	QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Q1: 	What is the relationship between the exception in 21 CFR 1271.15(b) and the
four criteria described in 21 CFR 1271.10(a)?
A1: 	The regulations in 21 CFR 1271.15, including 21 CFR 1271.15(b) provide
exceptions from the requirements in Part 1271. The four criteria described in
21 CFR 1271.10(a) are assessed to determine whether an HCT/P that does not fall
under any of the exceptions in 21 CFR 1271.15 is regulated solely under section
361 of the PHS Act and Part 1271.
The assessment of whether the exception in 21 CFR 1271.15(b) applies is
independent from the determination of whether the HCT/P meets the criteria in
21 CFR 1271.10(a) (e.g., the criteria of minimal manipulation in
21 CFR 1271.10(a)(1) and homologous use in 21 CFR 1271.10(a)(2) are not
considered when determining whether an HCT/P meets the exception in
21 CFR 1271.15(b)). Further, the assessment of whether the exception in
21 CFR 1271.15(b) applies is made before considering the four criteria in
21 CFR 1271.10(a). Thus, if an establishment meets the exception in
21 CFR 1271.15(b), the establishment is excepted from the requirements under
Part 1271 and the establishment need not consider whether that HCT/P meets the
four criteria in 21 CFR 1271.10(a).
Q2: 	When does the exception in 21 CFR 1271.15(b) apply?
A2: 	For the exception to apply, an establishment5 must:
a. Remove and implant the HCT/Ps into the same individual from whom they
were removed (autologous use);
b. Implant the HCT/Ps within the same surgical procedure; and
c. 	The HCT/Ps remain “such HCT/Ps;” they are in their original form.6
5 “Establishment” means a place of business under one management, at one general physical location, that engages
in the manufacture of HCT/Ps (21 CFR 1271.3(b)). As stated in the “Guidance for Industry: Regulation of Human
Cells, Tissues, and Cellular and Tissue-Based Products (HCT/Ps) - Small Entity Compliance Guide,” one general
physical location could be reasonably construed to include separate buildings within close proximity provided that
the activities in them are closely related to the same business enterprise, under the supervision of the same local
management, and capable of being inspected at the same time. See:
https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/Tissue/ucm0
73366.htm.
6 The communicable disease risks, as well as safety risks, generally would be no different from those typically
associated with surgery.
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
5
Q3: 	Section 1271.15(b) refers to implanting “such HCT/P.” What is meant by
“such HCT/P”?
A3: 	An HCT/P remains “such HCT/P” when it is in its original form. Generally, the
only processing steps that will allow an HCT/P to remain “such HCT/P” are
rinsing, cleansing, sizing, and shaping.
Further, as described in the answer to Q1, the assessment of whether an HCT/P is
“such HCT/P” under 21 CFR 1271.15(b) is different from the assessment of
whether an HCT/P is minimally manipulated under 21 CFR 1271.10(a).
Accordingly, even processing that may be considered minimal manipulation
within 21 CFR 1271.10(a), will typically cause the HCT/P to no longer be “such
HCT/P” under 21 CFR 1271.15(b), if the processing is not limited to rinsing,
cleansing, sizing, or shaping.
Q4: 	What is autologous use?
A4: 	As defined in 21 CFR 1271.3(a), autologous use means the implantation,
transplantation, infusion, or transfer of human cells or tissue back into the
individual from whom the cells or tissue were recovered. The exception in
21 CFR 1271.15(b) applies only when the HCT/P is removed from and implanted
into the same individual.
Q5: 	Section 1271.15(b) refers to same surgical procedure. What types of
procedures are considered the same surgical procedures?
A5: 	For the purposes of the exception in 21 CFR 1271.15(b), procedures that involve
an incision or instrumentation during which an HCT/P is removed from and
implanted into the same individual within a single operation performed at the
same establishment, are generally considered to be the same surgical procedures.
Examples include autologous skin grafting, and coronary artery bypass surgery
involving autologous vein or artery grafting.
Q6: 	Are there any types of procedures consisting of more than a single operation
that are considered same surgical procedure for purposes of the exception in
21 CFR 1271.15(b)?
A6: 	Generally, as discussed in the answer to Q5, procedures consisting of more than a
single operation are not considered the same surgical procedure.
However, under limited circumstances, surgical removal and subsequent
implantation of the autologous HCT/P may be considered same surgical
procedure even though the removal and future implantation may be a number of
days apart. During this time, the HCT/P may be rinsed or cleansed and
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
6
temporarily stored after being labeled, pending implantation, and this would still
be considered the same surgical procedure, provided no other processing steps
and no other manufacturing steps beyond labeling and storage are performed.7
Establishments that perform the following procedures consisting of more than a
single operation generally would qualify for the exception in 21 CFR 1271.15(b):
a. 	Craniotomy or craniectomy with subsequent implantation of the bone flap
to reverse the cranial defect.
b. 	Parathyroidectomy with subsequent implantation of a portion of the tissue
to preserve parathyroid function.
The exception generally applies only to those establishments that both remove
and implant the autologous HCT/P at the same establishment. An establishment
that removes an HCT/P for implantation into the same individual, but intends the
HCT/P to be implanted at a different establishment, would not qualify for the
exception. Shipping the HCT/P to another establishment for implantation raises
safety concerns, such as contamination and cross-contamination, beyond those
typically associated with surgery. The establishment shipping the autologous
HCT/P for use at another establishment is distributing the HCT/P8, which is a
manufacturing9 step, and therefore the shipping establishment must register,
submit an HCT/P list under Part 1271, Subpart B, and follow all other applicable
regulations in Part 1271.10
For craniotomy, craniectomy, or parathyroidectomy procedures, FDA recognizes
that under limited circumstances, in order to accommodate the medical needs of
an individual patient, there may be a medical necessity for the establishment that
removed the autologous cranial bone flap or portions of parathyroid tissue to send
the HCT/Ps to a different establishment for reimplantation in the patient. In such
cases, provided precautions will be taken to protect the HCT/P from
contamination and cross-contamination, FDA does not intend to object to the
recovering establishment sending the autologous cranial bone flap or portions of
parathyroid tissue to a different establishment for reimplantation in the patient,
without registering and listing with the FDA.
7 Temporary storage of a cranial bone flap or portion of parathyroid tissue may include steps to preserve those
HCT/Ps in an appropriate condition for reimplantation, such as disinfecting or cryopreserving.
8 “Distribution” means any conveyance or shipment (including importation and exportation) of an HCT/P that has
been determined to meet all release criteria, whether or not such conveyance or shipment is entirely intrastate
(21 CFR 1271.3(bb)).
9 “Manufacture” means, but is not limited to, any or all steps in the recovery, processing, storage, labeling,
packaging, or distribution of any human cell or tissue, and the screening or testing of the cell or tissue donor
(21 CFR 1271.3(e)).
10 If you are an establishment that receives the autologous HCT/P only for the purpose of implantation in the
individual within your facility, you are not required to comply with the requirements in Part 1271, including
registration (21 CFR 1271.15(d)).
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
7
Q7: 	Can an establishment that processes an autologous HCT/P after removal and
prior to implantation still qualify for the exception in 21 CFR 1271.15(b)?
A7: 	Generally, an establishment that processes an autologous HCT/P prior to
implantation would be required to comply with the requirements of Part 1271 and
would not qualify for the exception. As a general matter, the establishment may
qualify for the exception if the only processing steps taken are rinsing, cleansing,
sizing, or shaping the tissue. Processing11 of the autologous HCT/P raises safety
concerns, such as contamination and cross-contamination, beyond those typically
associated with surgery.12
In general, limited handling such as rinsing and cleansing, by centrifugation or
filtration solely to remove debris (e.g., lipids, blood, bone particles) would allow
the HCT/P to remain “such HCT/P.” Other processing steps, including by
centrifugation or filtration, for cell isolation, cell expansion, cell activation, or
enzymatic digestion generally would not allow the HCT/P to remain “such
HCT/P” and the establishment would not qualify for the exception13.
Example 7-1: Adipose tissue is recovered by tumescent liposuction14. The
lipoaspirate is centrifuged to facilitate removal of debris and extracellular fluid.
No steps are taken to isolate stem cells (also commonly referred to as stromal
vascular fraction) from the lipoaspirate. The adipose tissue remains “such
HCT/P” because nothing else is added to the adipose tissue, only minor handling
is performed, and the adipose tissue retains its original form as a connective tissue
composed of clusters of adipocytes and other cells surrounded by a reticular fiber
network and interspersed small blood vessels. It is then re-implanted into the
same patient from whom it was removed in order to achieve the intended effect15.
We generally would consider the establishment removing and implanting this
HCT/P from adipose tissue to qualify for the exception under 21 CFR 1271.15(b).
11 “Processing” means any activity performed on an HCT/P, other than recovery, donor screening, donor testing,
storage, labeling, packaging, or distribution, such as testing for microorganisms, preparation, sterilization, steps to
inactivate or remove adventitious agents, preservation for storage, and removal from storage (21 CFR 1271.3(ff)).
12 1997 Proposed Approach page 12.
https://www.fda.gov/downloads/biologicsbloodvaccines/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/tissue
/ucm062601.pdf. For example, “an infected product could cross-contaminate other cellular or tissue-based
products…or could contaminate processing equipment, which, if not properly treated, could contaminate other tissue
processed with that equipment. If contaminated tissue is not properly tested or labeled, health care workers as well
as patients may be put at risk.”
13 Platelet rich plasma (PRP) and other blood products are not considered HCT/Ps, therefore the exception in
21 CFR 1271.15(b) is not applicable.
14 For additional regulatory considerations for adipose tissue, see the guidance entitled “Regulatory Considerations
for Human Cell, Tissues, and Cellular and Tissue-Based Products: Minimal Manipulation and Homologous Use;
Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff” dated November 2017.
15 In this situation, which may arise in some dermatologic or plastic surgery procedures where the autologous,
cleansed adipose tissue is aliquoted, temporarily stored, and injected during a predetermined, limited number of
subsequent operations to achieve the desired contouring effect, the establishment removing, temporarily storing, and
reimplanting the autologous adipose tissue may still qualify for the exception in 21 CFR 1271.15(b).
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
8
Example 7-2: Adipose tissue is recovered by tumescent liposuction and
processed (e.g., enzymatic digestion, mechanical disruption) to isolate cellular
components, commonly referred to as stromal vascular fraction, which is
considered a potential source of adipose-derived stromal/stem cells. Cell isolation
would typically cause the adipose tissue to no longer be “such HCT/P” and the
establishment would generally not be considered to qualify for the exception
under 21 CFR 1271.15(b).
Examples of sizing and shaping that would generally allow the HCT/P to remain
“such HCT/P” include dilatation to size a vascular graft in coronary artery bypass
graft surgery, cutting parathyroid tissue into pieces appropriately sized for
reimplantation, and meshing of skin grafts to facilitate shaping and sizing to cover
cutaneous burn wounds.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.