Internal Revenue Bulletin 2004-47 (PDF rendition): IRS Revenue Rulings

Preserve advance releases and the authoritative Internal Revenue Bulletin rendition; directory timestamps are file-publication metadata, not legal effective dates. HTML bulletins begin June 2003; earlier available issues require full PDF parsing. Whole bulletin rendition: numbered items are identified below; other legal material and publisher context remain included. This is not a new standalone advance release.

Bulletin No. 200
4-47
November 22, 200
4
HIGHLIGHTS
OF THIS ISSUE
These synopses are intended only as aids to the reader in
identifying the subject matter covered. They may not be
relied upon as authoritative interpretations.
INCOME TAX
Rev. Rul. 2004–107, page 852.
Section 1274A — inflation adjusted numbers for 2005.
This ruling provides the dollar amounts, increased by the 2005
inflation adjustment, for section 1274A of the Code. Rev. Rul.
2003–119 supplemented and superseded.
Rev. Rul. 2
004–108, page 853.
CPI adjust
ment for below-market loans for 2005.The
amount tha
t section 7872(g) of the Code permits a taxpayer
to lend to a
qualified continuing care facility without incurring
imputed i
nterest is published and adjusted for inflation for years
1987–200
5. Rev. Rul. 2003–118 supplemented and super-
seded.
EMPLOYEE PLANS
REG–114726–04, page 857.
Proposed regulations under section 401(a) of the Code pro-
vide rules permitting distributions to be made from a pension
plan under a phased retirement program and set forth require-
ments for abona fidephased retirement program. These regu-
lations will provide the public with guidance regarding distribu-
tions from qualified pension plans and will affect administrators
of, and participants in, these plans.
Notice
2004–77, page 855.
Weight
ed average interest rate update; corporate bond
indice
s; 30-year Treasury securities.The weighted aver-
age int
erest rate for November 2004 and the resulting permis-
sible r
ange of interest rates used to calculate current liability
and to d
etermine the required contribution are set forth.
EMPLOYMENT TAX
Announcement 2004–96, page 872.
This announcement advises employers about a new Code Y for
use on the 2005 Form W-2. This code will be used to identify
annual deferrals of income under a nonqualified deferred com-
pensation plan.
Announcements of Disbarments and Suspensions begin on page 866.
Fi
nding Lists begin on page ii.

The IRS Mission
Provide America’s taxpayers top quality service by helping
them understand and meet their tax responsibilities and by
applying the tax law with integrity and fairness to all.
Introduction
The Internal Revenue Bulletin is the authoritative instrument of
the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for announcing official
rulings and procedures of the Internal Revenue Service and for
publishing Treasury Decisions, Executive Orders, Tax Conven-
tions, legislation, court decisions, and other items of general
interest. It is published weekly and may be obtained from the
Superintendent of Documents on a subscription basis. Bulletin
contents are compiled semiannually into Cumulative Bulletins,
which are sold on a single-copy basis.
It is the policy of the Service to publish in the Bulletin all sub-
stantive rulings necessary to promote a uniform application of
the tax laws, including all rulings that supersede, revoke, mod-
ify, or amend any of those previously published in the Bulletin.
All published rulings apply retroactively unless otherwise indi-
cated. Procedures relating solely to matters of internal man-
agement are not published; however, statements of internal
practices and procedures that affect the rights and duties of
taxpayers are published.
Revenue rulings represent the conclusions of the Service on the
application of the law to the pivotal facts stated in the revenue
ruling. In those based on positions taken in rulings to taxpayers
or technical advice to Service field offices, identifying details
and information of a confidential nature are deleted to prevent
unwarranted invasions of privacy and to comply with statutory
requirements.
Rulings and procedures reported in the Bulletin do not have the
force and effect of Treasury Department Regulations, but they
may be used as precedents. Unpublished rulings will not be
relied on, used, or cited as precedents by Service personnel in
the disposition of other cases. In applying published rulings and
procedures, the effect of subsequent legislation, regulations,
court decisions, rulings, and procedures must be considered,
and Service personnel and others concerned are cautioned
against reaching the same conclusions in other cases unless
the facts and circumstances are substantially the same.
The Bulletin is divided into four parts as follows:
Part I.—19
86 Code.
This part i
ncludes rulings and decisions based on provisions of
the Intern
al Revenue Code of 1986.
Part II.—Treaties and Tax Legislation.
This part is divided into two subparts as follows: Subpart A,
Tax Conventions and Other Related Items, and Subpart B, Leg-
islation and Related Committee Reports.
Part III.—Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous.
To the extent practicable, pertinent cross references to these
subjects are contained in the other Parts and Subparts. Also
included in this part are Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rul-
ings. Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rulings are issued by
the Department of the Treasury’s Office of the Assistant Sec-
retary (Enforcement).
Part IV
.—Items of General Interest.
This par
t includes notices of proposed rulemakings, disbar-
ment an
d suspension lists, and announcements.
The last Bulletin for each month includes a cumulative index
for the matters published during the preceding months. These
monthly indexes are cumulated on a semiannual basis, and are
published in the last Bulletin of each semiannual period.
The c
ontents of this publication are not copyrighted and may be reprinted freely. A citation of the Internal Revenue Bulletin as the source would be appropriate.
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S.Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402.
November 22, 20042004–47 I.R.B.

Part I. Rulings and Decisions Under the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986
Section 483.—Interest on
Certain Deferred Payments
26 CFR 1.483–1: Computation of interest on certain
deferred payments.
As defined by section 1274A, the definitions for
both “qualified debt instruments” and “cash method
debt instruments” have dollar ceilings on the stated
principal amount. The limits to the stated princi-
pal amount are adjusted for inflation for sales or ex-
changes occurring in the 2005 calendar year. See Rev.
Rul. 2004-107, page 852.
Section 1274.—Determi-
nation of Issue Price in the
Case of Certain Debt Instru-
ments Issued for Property
26 CFR 1.1274A–1: Special rules for certain trans-
actions where stated principal amount does not ex-
ceed $2,800,000.
As defined by section 1274A, the definitions for
both “qualified debt instruments” and “cash method
debt instruments” have dollar ceilings on the stated
principal amount. The limits to the stated princi-
pal amount are adjusted for inflation for sales or ex-
changes occurring in the 2005 calendar year. See Rev.
Rul. 2004-107, page 852.
Section 1274A.—Special
Rules for Certain
Transactions Where Stated
Principal Amount Does Not
Exceed $2,800,000
(Also §§ 1274, 483; 1.1274A–1, 1.483–1.)
Section 1274A–inflation adjusted
numbers for 2005.This ruling provides
the dollar amounts, increased by the 2005
inflation adjustment, for section 1274A of
the Code. Rev. Rul. 2003–119 supple-
mented and superseded.
Rev. Rul. 2004–107
This revenue ruling provides the dollar
amounts, increased by the 2005 inflation
adjustment, for § 1274A of the Internal
Revenue Code.
BACKGROUND
In general, §§ 483 and 1274 determine
the principal amount of a debt instrument
given in consideration for the sale or ex-
change of nonpublicly traded property. In
addition, any interest on a debt instrument
subject to § 1274 is taken into account un-
der the original issue discount provisions
of the Code. Section 1274A, however,
modifies the rules under §§ 483 and 1274
for certain types of debt instruments.
In the case of a “qualified debt instru-
ment,” the discount rate used for purposes
of §§ 483 and 1274 may not exceed 9 per-
cent, compounded semiannually. Section
1274A(b) defines a qualified debt instru-
ment as any debt instrument given in con-
sideration for the sale or exchange of prop-
erty (other than new § 38 property within
the meaning of § 48(b), as in effect on the
day before the date of enactment of the
Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1990) if the
stated principal amount of the instrument
does not exceed the amount specified in
§ 1274A(b). For debt instruments arising
out of sales or exchanges before January 1,
1990, this amount is $2,800,000.
In the case of a “cash method debt in-
strument,” as defined in § 1274A(c), the
borrower and lender may elect to use the
cash receipts and disbursements method
of accounting. In particular, for any cash
method debt instrument, § 1274 does not
apply, and interest on the instrument is ac-
counted for by both the borrower and the
lender under the cash method of account-
ing. A cash method debt instrument is
a qualified debt instrument that meets the
following additional requirements: (A) In
the case of instruments arising out of sales
or exchanges before January 1, 1990, the
stated principal amount does not exceed
$2,000,000; (B) the lender does not use an
accrual method of accounting and is not a
dealer with respect tothe property sold or
exchanged; (C) § 1274 would have applied
to the debt instrument but for an election
under § 1274A(c); and (D) an election un-
der § 1274A(c) is jointly made with respect
to the debt instrument by the borrower and
lender. Section 1.1274A–1(c)(1) of the In-
come Tax Regulations provides rules con-
cerning the time for, and manner of, mak-
ing this election.
Section 1274A(d)(2) provides that, for
any debt instrument arising out of a sale
or exchange during any calendar year
after 1989, the dollar amounts stated in
§ 1274A(b) and § 1274A(c)(2)(A) are
increased by the inflation adjustment for
the calendar year. Any increase due to
the inflation adjustment is rounded to the
nearest multiple of $100 (or, if the increase
is a multiple of $50 and not of $100, the
increase is increased to the nearest mul-
tiple of $100). The inflation adjustment
for any calendar year is the percentage (if
any) by which the CPI for the preceding
calendar year exceeds the CPI for calendar
year 1988. Section 1274A(d)(2)(B) de-
fines the CPI for any calendar year as the
average of the Consumer Price Index as of
the close of the 12-month period ending
on September 30 of that calendar year.
INFLATION-ADJUSTED AMOUNTS
For debt instruments arising out of sales
or exchanges after December 31, 1989, the
inflation-adjusted amounts under § 1274A
areshowninTable1.
2004–47 I.R.B.852November 22, 2004

Rev. Rul. 2004–107 Table 1
Inflation-Adjusted Amounts Under § 1274A
CalendarYear
ofSale
orExchange
1274A(b)Amount
(qualifieddebt
instrument)
1274A(c)(2)(A)Amount
(cashmethoddebt
instrument)
1990
$2,933,200$2,095,100
1991
$3,079,600$2,199,700
1992
$3,234,900$2,310,600
1993
$3,332,400$2,380,300
1994
$3,433,500$2,452,500
1995
$3,523,600$2,516,900
1996
$3,622,500$2,587,500
1997
$3,723,800$2,659,900
1998
$3,823,100$2,730,800
1999
$3,885,500$2,775,400
2000
$3,960,100$2,828,700
2001
$4,085,9
00
$2,918,5
00
2002
$4,217,500$3,012,500
2003
$4,280,800$3,057,700
2004
$4,381,300$3,129,500
2005
$4,483,000$3,202,100
Note: These inflation adjustments were computed using the All-Urban, Consumer Price Index, 1982–1984 base, published by the
Bureau of Labor Statistics.
EFFEC
TONOTHERDOCUMENTS
Rev. Rul. 2003–119, 2003–2 C.B.
1094, is supplemented and superseded.
DRAFTING INFORMATION
The author of this revenue ruling is
Avital Grunhaus of the Office of the Asso-
ciate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions
and Products). For further information re-
garding this revenue ruling, please contact
Mrs. Grunhaus at (202) 622–3930 (not a
toll-free call).
Section 7872.—Treatment
of Loans With Below-Market
Interest Rates
CP
I adjustment for below-market
lo
ans for 2005.The amount that section
78
72(g) of the Code permits a taxpayer
to
lend to a qualified continuing care fa-
c
ility without incurring imputed interest
i
s published and adjusted for inflation for
years
1987–2005. Rev. Rul. 2003–118
suppl
emented and superseded.
Rev. R
ul. 2004–108
This r
evenue ruling publishes the
amoun
t that § 7872(g) of the Internal
Reve
nue Code permits a taxpayer to lend
to a q
ualifying continuing care facility
with
out incurring imputed interest. The
amou
nt is adjusted for inflation for the
year
s after 1986.
Sect
ion 7872 generally treats loans
bear
ing a below-market interest rate as if
the
y bore interest at the market rate.
Sect
ion 7872(g)(1) provides that, in
gen
eral, § 7872 does not apply for any
cal
endar year to any below-market loan
mad
e by a lender to a qualified continu-
ing
care facility pursuant to a continuing
car
e contract if the lender (or the lender’s
sp
ouse) attains age 65 before the close of
th
e year.
Se
ction 7872(g)(2) provides that, in
th
e case of loans made after October 11,
19
85, and before 1987, § 7872(g)(1) ap-
pl
ies only to the extent that the aggregate
outst
anding amount of any loan to which
§ 7872
(g) applies (determined without
regar
d to § 7872(g)(2)), when added to the
aggr
egate outstanding amount of all other
prev
ious loans between the lender (or the
lend
er’s spouse) and any qualified contin-
uing
care facility to which § 7872(g)(1)
appl
ies, does not exceed $90,000.
Sect
ion 7872(g)(5) provides that, for
loan
s made during any calendar year af-
ter 1
986 to which § 7872(g)(1) applies, the
$90
,000 limit specified in § 7872(g)(2) is
inc
reased by an inflation adjustment. The
inf
lation adjustment for any calendar year
is t
he percentage (if any) by which the
Con
sumer Price Index (CPI) for the pre-
ce
ding calendar year exceeds the CPI for
ca
lendar year 1985. Section 7872(g)(5)
st
ates that the CPI for any calendar year is
th
e average of the CPI as of the close of the
12
-month period ending on September 30
of
that calendar year.
Ta
ble 1 sets forth the amount specified
in
§ 7872(g)(2) of the Code. The amount
i
s increased by the inflation adjustment for
t
he years 1987–2005.
November 22, 20048532004–47 I.R.B.

REV. RUL. 2004–108
TABLE 1
Limit under § 7872(g)(2)
YearAmount
Before 1987
$ 90,000
1987
$ 92,200
1988
$ 94,800
1989
$ 98,800
1990
$103,500
1991
$108,600
1992
$114,100
1993
$117,500
1994
$121,100
1995
$124,300
1996
$127,800
1997
$131,300
1998
$134,800
1999
$137,000
2000
$139,700
2001
$144,1
00
2002
$148,800
2003
$151,000
2004
$154,500
2005
$158,100
Note: These inflation adjustments were computed using the All-Urban, Consumer Price Index 1982–1984 base, published by the
Bureau of Labor Statistics.
EFFE
CT ON OTHER DOCUMENTS
Rev.
Rul. 2003–118, 2003–2 C.B.
1095
, is supplemented and superseded.
DRAF
TING INFORMATION
The a
uthor of this revenue ruling is
Avit
al Grunhaus of the Office of the Asso-
ciat
e Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions
and P
roducts). For further information re-
gard
ing this revenue ruling, please contact
Mrs.
Grunhaus at (202) 622–3930 (not a
tol
l-free call).
2004–47 I.R.B.854November 22, 2004

Part III. Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous
Weighted Average Interest
Rates Update
Notice 2004–77
This notice provides guidance as to the
corporate bond weighted average interest
rate and the permissible range of interest
rates specified under § 412(b)(5)(B)(ii)(II)
of the Internal Revenue Code. In ad-
dition, it provides guidance as to the
interest rate on 30-year Treasury securi-
ties under § 417(e)(3)(A)(ii)(II), and the
weighted average interest rate and permis-
sible ranges of interest rates based on the
30-year Treasury securities rate.
CORPORATE BOND WEIGHTED
AVERAGE INTEREST RATE
Sections 412(b)(5)(B)(ii) and 412(l)
(7)(C)(i), as amended by the Pension
Funding Equity Act of 2004, provide that
the interest rates used to calculate current
liability and to determine the required
contribution under § 412(l) for plan years
beginning in 2004 or 2005 must be within
a permissible range based on the weighted
average of the rates of interest on amounts
invested conservatively in long term in-
vestment grade corporate bonds during the
4-year period ending on the last day before
the beginning of the plan year.
Notice 2004–34, 2004–18 I.R.B. 848,
provides guidelines for determining the
corporate bond weighted average interest
rate and the resulting permissible range
of interest rates used to calculate current
liability. That notice establishes that the
corporate bond weighted average is based
on the monthly composite corporate bond
rate derived from designated corporate
bond indices.
The composite corporate bond rate for
October 2004 is 5.57 percent. Pursuant
to Notice 2004–34, the Service has de-
termined this rate as the average of the
monthly yields for the included corporate
bond indices for that month.
The following corporate bond weighted
average interest rate was determined for
plan years beginning in the month shown
below.
For Plan Years
Beginning in:
Corporate
Bond
Weighted
Average
90% to 100%
Permissible
Range
MonthYear
November20046.175.56 to 6.17
30-YEAR TREASURY SECURITIES
WEIGHTED AVERAGE INTEREST
RATE
Section 417(e)(3)(A)(ii)(II) defines
the applicable interest rate, which must
be used for purposes of determining the
minimum present value of a participant’s
benefit under § 417(e)(1) and (2), as the
annual rate of interest on 30-year Treasury
securities for the month before the date
of distribution or such other time as the
Secretary may by regulations prescribe.
Section 1.417(e)–1(d)(3) of the Income
Tax Regulations provides that the applica-
bleinterestrateforamonthistheannual
interest rate on 30-year Treasury securi-
ties as specified by the Commissioner for
that month in revenue rulings, notices or
other guidance published in the Internal
Revenue Bulletin.
Section 404(a)(1) of the Code, as
amended by the Pension Funding Eq-
uity Act of 2004, permits an employer
to elect to disregard subclause (II) of
§ 412(b)(5)(B)(ii) to determine the max-
imum amount of the deduction allowed
under § 404(a)(1).
The rate of interest on 30-year Treasury
securities for October 2004 is 4.86 percent.
Pursuant to Notice 2002–26, 2002–1 C.B.
743, the Service has determined this rate
as the monthly average of the daily deter-
mination of yield on the 30-year Treasury
bond maturing in February 2031.
The following 30-year Treasury rates
were determined for the plan years begin-
ning in the month shown below.
For Plan Years
Beginning in:
30-Year
Treasury
Weighted
Average
90% to 105%
Permissible
Range
90% to 110%
Permissible
Range
MonthYear
November20045.124.61 to 5.384.61 to 5.63
November 22, 20048552004–47 I.R.B.

Drafting Information
The principal authors of this notice
are Paul Stern and Tony Montanaro of
the Employee Plans, Tax Exempt and
Government Entities Division. For fur-
ther information regarding this notice,
please contact the Employee Plans’ tax-
payer assistance telephone service at
1–877–829–5500 (a toll-free number),
between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and
6:30 p.m. Eastern time, Monday through
Friday. Mr. Stern may be reached at
1–202–283–9703. Mr. Montanaro may
be reached at 1–202–283–9714. The tele-
phone numbers in thepreceding sentences
are not toll-free.
2004–47 I.R.B.856November 22, 2004

Part IV. Items of General Interest
Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking
Distributions From a Pension
Plan Under a Phased
Retirement Program
REG–114726–04
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service
(IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
SUMMARY: This notice of proposed rule-
making contains proposed amendments to
the Income Tax Regulations under sec-
tion 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.
These proposed regulations provide rules
permitting distributions to be made from
a pension plan under a phased retirement
program and set forth requirements for a
bona fidephased retirement program. The
proposed regulations will provide the pub-
lic with guidance regarding distributions
from qualified pension plans and will af-
fect administrators of, and participants in,
such plans.
DATES: Written or electronic comments
and requests for a public hearing must be
received by February 8, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Send submissio
ns to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–114726
–04), room
5203, Internal Revenue Ser
vice, PO Box
7604, Ben Franklin Station
,Washing-
ton, DC 20044. Submissions
may be
hand-delivered Monday thr
ough Friday
between the hours of 8 a.m.
and 4 p.m.
to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–114
726–04),
Courier’s Desk, Internal
Revenue Service,
1111 Constitution Avenu
e, NW, Wash-
ington, DC, or sent elect
ronically, via the
IRS Internet site atwww.
irs.gov/regsor
via the Federal eRulema
king Portal at
www.regulations.gov(
indicate IRS and
REG–114726–04).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT: Concerning the regulations,
Cathy A. Vohs, 202–622–6090; con-
cerning submissions and requests for
a public hearing, contact Sonya Cruse,
202–622–7180 (not toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
As people are living longer, healthier
lives, there is a greaterrisk that individu-
als may outlive their retirement savings. In
addition, employers have expressed inter-
est in encouraging older, more experienced
workers to stay in the workforce. One ap-
proach that some employers have imple-
mented is to offer employees the opportu-
nity for “phased retirement.”
While there is no single approach to
phased retirement, these arrangements
generally provide employees who are at
or near eligibility for retirement with the
opportunity for a reduced schedule or
workload, thereby providing a smoother
transition from full-time employment to
retirement. These arrangements permit
the employer to retain the services of an
experienced employee and provide the
employee with the opportunity to continue
activeemploymentatalevelthatalso
allows greater flexibility and time away
from work.
During such a transition arrangement,
employees may wish to supplement their
part-time income with a portion of their re-
tirement savings. However, phased retire-
ment can also increase the risk of outliv-
ing retirement savings for employees who
begin drawing upon their retirement sav-
ings before normal retirement age. Even
though the annuity distribution options of-
fered by defined benefit plans preclude
outliving benefits, early distribution of a
portion of the employee’s benefit will re-
duce the benefits available after full re-
tirement. On the other hand, phased re-
tirement also can provide employees addi-
tional time to save for retirement because
employees continue working while they
are able to do so, and can accrue additional
benefits and reduce or forgo early spending
of their retirement savings.
In light of this background, Treasury
and the IRS issued Notice 2002–43 in
the Cumulative Bulletin (2002–2 C.B. 38
(July 8, 2002)), in which comments were
requested regarding phased retirement.
Notice 2002–43 specifically requested
comments on a wide variety of issues,
including the following:
•Under what circumstances, if any,
would permitting distributions from
a defined benefit plan before an em-
ployee attains normal retirement age
be consistent with the requirement that
a defined benefit plan be established
and maintained primarily for purposes
of providing benefits after retirement,
such as the extent to which an em-
ployee has actually reduced his or her
workload?
•If there are such circumstances, how
should any early retirement subsidy be
treated?
Comments Received
Sixteen written comments were for-
mally submitted in response to Notice
2002–43. These comments are in addi-
tion to the substantial number of articles
and other published materials addressing
phased retirement.
1
While some of the comments expressed
concerns over the potential for both dis-
sipation of retirement funds and violation
of age discrimination laws, commentators
generally responded favorably to the pro-
posal to provide guidance on facilitating
phased retirement arrangements. These
commentators noted that permitting pen-
sion distributions during phased retirement
would be attractive to both employers and
employees. Commentators also indicated
that any guidance issued should provide
that establishment of phased retirement ar-
rangements be optional on the part of the
employer and that participation in any such
arrangement be voluntary on the part of the
employee.
Most of the comments recommended
that eligibility to participate in a phased
1
See, for example, Pension & Welfare Benefits Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, “Report on Working Group on Phased Retirement to the AdvisoryCouncil on Employee Welfare
& Pension Benefit Plans,” 2000; Forman, Jonathan Barry, “How Federal Pension Laws Influence Individual Work and Retirement Decisions,” 54 Tax Law. 143 (2000); Littler Mendelson,
“Employers Consider ‘Phased Retirement’ to Retain Employees,” Maryland Employment Law Letter, Vol 10, Issue 6 (April, 2000); Geisel, Jerry, “Rethinking Phased Retirement; IRS Call
for Comment May Signal Pension Law Changes,” Business Insurance (June 24,2002); Flahaven, Brian, “Please Don’t Go! Why Phased Retirement May Make Sense For Your Government,”
18 Gov’t Finance Review 24 (Oct. 1, 2002); NPR, Morning Edition, “Older Workers Turn to ‘Phased’ Retirement,” (May 18, 2004) atwww.npr.org/features/feature.php?wfId=1900465
November 22, 20048572004–47 I.R.B.

retirement program be limited to employ-
ees who are eligible for immediately com-
mencing retirement benefits under the plan
(including those eligible for early retire-
ment benefits). Other comments recom-
mended that retirement benefits be permit-
ted to start at a specific age or combination
of age and service; however, they noted
that current legislative constraints, notably
the section 72(t) 10 percent additional in-
come tax on early distributions, may limit
the desirability of this option.
Some commentatorsadvocated that any
phased retirement arrangement should be
cost neutral and not create additional fund-
ing obligations for employers. Others rec-
ommended that any early retirement sub-
sidy available to an employee upon full re-
tirement continue to be available if the em-
ployee participates in phased retirement.
For example, one such commentator rec-
ommended not only that any early retire-
ment subsidy be available upon phased re-
tirement, but also that the subsidy so paid
not be permitted to be applied to reduce the
remainder of the benefit that is earned by
the employee, particularly if the employee
continues working past normal retirement
age.
The comments were divided over what
constituted phased retirement. Several
recommended that phased retirement ben-
efits be limited to cases in which there is
a reduction in hours worked. Others rec-
ommended that a reduction in hours not
be required and that a transition to a less
stressful job also be considered phased
retirement or that the full retirement ben-
efit be payable after the attainment of a
specified age or years of service without
regard to any change in work.
The commentators who recommended
that phased retirement benefits be limited
to cases in which there is a reduction in
hours worked generally recommended that
the phased retirement benefits payable be
proportionate to the reduction in work,
based on a “dual status” approach. Under
this dual status approach, an employee
who reduces his or her work schedule
to, for example, 80 percent of full-time
would be considered to be 20 percent re-
tired and thus entitled to 20 percent of his
or her retirement benefit. The employee
would continue to accrue additional ben-
efits based on the actual hours he or she
continues to work.
Several of the commentators discussed
the implications of phased retirement ben-
efits for purposes of the nondiscrimination
rules of section 401(a)(4) and the anti-cut-
back rules of section 411(d)(6). Many of
the comments said that phased retirement
arrangements must be flexible and that it
would be important for employers to be
able to adopt a phased retirement arrange-
ment on a temporary (even experimental)
basis.
Many commentators expressed concern
over the effect that a reduction in hours and
the corresponding reduction in compensa-
tion would have on the final average pay
of an individual for purposes of the bene-
fit calculation when the employee fully re-
tires. These comments generally requested
guidance on this issue,including clarifica-
tion as to whether an employee’s final av-
erage pay is permitted to decline as a re-
sult of the employee’s reduction in hours
pursuant to participation in a phased retire-
ment arrangement.
Explanation of Provisions
Overview
The proposed regulations would amend
§1.401(a)–1(b) and add §1.401(a)–3 in or-
der to permit apro ratashare of an em-
ployee’s accrued benefit to be paid under a
bona fidephased retirement program. The
pro ratashare is based on the extent to
which the employee has reduced hours un-
der the program. Under thispro rataap-
proach, an employee maintains a dual sta-
tus (i.e., partially retired and partially in
service) during the phased retirement pe-
riod. Thispro rataor dual status approach
to phased retirement was one of the ap-
proaches recommended by commentators.
While all approaches suggested by
commentators were considered, thepro
rataapproach is the most consistent with
the requirement that benefits be main-
tained primarily for retirement. Other
approaches, such as permitting benefits to
be fully available if an employee works
reduced hours as part of phased retire-
ment or permitting distributions of the
entire accrued benefit to be paid as of a
specified age prior to normal retirement
age, are fundamentally inconsistent with
the §1.401(a)–1(b) principle that benefits
be paid only after retirement. In addi-
tion, although a number of commentators
suggested that guidance address the prac-
tice of terminating an employee with a
prearranged rehiring of the employee (or
similar sham transactions), the proposed
regulations do not address this topic be-
cause it involves additional issues outside
the scope of this project.
Rules Relating to Phased Retirement
Under the proposed regulations, a plan
would be permitted to pay apro ratapor-
tion of the employee’s benefits under a
bona fidephased retirement program be-
fore attainment of normal retirement age.
The proposed regulations define abona
fidephased retirement program as a writ-
ten, employer-adopted program pursuant
to which employees may reduce the num-
ber of hours they customarily work begin-
ning on or after a retirement date specified
under the program and receive phased re-
tirement benefits. Payment of phased re-
tirement benefits is permitted only if the
program meets certain conditions, includ-
ing that employee participation is volun-
tary and the employee and employer ex-
pect the employee to reduce, by 20 percent
or more, the number of hours the employee
works during the phased retirement period.
Consistent with thepro rataapproach
discussed above, the maximum amount
that is permitted to be paid is limited to the
portion of the employee’s accrued benefit
equal to the product of the employee’s
total accrued benefit on the date the em-
ployee commences phased retirement (or
any earlier date selected by the plan for
administrative ease) and the employee’s
reduction in work. The reduction in work
is based on the employee’s work schedule
fraction, which is the ratio of the hours
that the employee is reasonably expected
to work during the phased retirement pe-
riod to the hours that would be worked
if the employee were full-time. Based in
part on commentators’ concerns regarding
early retirement subsidies, the proposed
regulations generally require that all early
retirement benefits, retirement-type sub-
sidies, and optional forms of benefit that
would be available upon full retirement
be available with respect to the phased
retirement accrued benefit. However, the
proposed regulations would not permit
payment to be made in the form of a
single-sum distribution (or other eligible
rollover distribution) in order to prevent
2004–47 I.R.B.858November 22, 2004

the premature distribution of retirement
benefits. The phased retirement benefit
is an optional form of benefit protected
by section 411(d)(6) and the election of a
phased retirement benefit is subject to the
provisions of section 417, including the
required explanation of the qualified joint
and survivor annuity.
Some comments suggested that phased
retirement be limited to employees who
have attained an age or service (or com-
bination thereof) that is customary for re-
tirement,e.g., where the employer has rea-
sonably determined in good faith that par-
ticipants who cease employment with the
employer after that age or service combi-
nation are typically not expected to con-
tinue to perform further services of a gen-
erally comparable nature elsewhere in the
workforce. Such a retirement age might
be considerably lower than age 65 in cer-
tain occupations (such as police or fire-
fighters). As discussed further below (un-
der the headingApplication to Plans Other
Than Qualified Pension Plans), the Trea-
sury and IRS have concluded that they do
not have the authority to permit payments
to begin from a section 401(k) plan under
abona fidephased retirement program be-
fore the employee attains age 59
1
/2or has
a severance from employment.
2
Further,
section 72(t)(3)(B) provides an additional
income tax on early distributions if annuity
distributions are made before the earlier of
age 59
1
/2or separation from service. Ac-
cordingly, in lieu of a customary retirement
age, the proposed regulations adopt a rule
that is consistent with section 401(k) and
section 72(t)(3)(B), under which phased
retirement benefits may not be paid before
an employee attains age 59
1
/2.
Additional Accruals During Phased
Retirement
The regulations provide that, during the
phased retirement period, in addition to be-
ing entitled to the phased retirement bene-
fit, the employee must be entitled to par-
ticipate in the plan in the same manner as
if the employee were still maintaining a
full-time work schedule (including calcu-
lation of average earnings) and must be en-
titled to the same benefits (including early
retirement benefits, retirement-type subsi-
dies, and optional forms of benefits) upon
full retirement as a similarly situated em-
ployee who has not elected phased retire-
ment, except that the years of service cred-
ited under the plan for any plan year dur-
ing the phased retirement period is mul-
tiplied by the ratio of the employee’s ac-
tual hours of service during the year to the
employee’s full-time work schedule, or by
the ratio of the employee’s compensation
to the compensation that would be paid for
full-time work. Thus, for example, under a
plan with a 1,000 hours of service require-
ment to accrue a benefit, an employee par-
ticipating in a phasedretirement program
will accrue proportionate additional bene-
fits, even if the employee works fewer than
1,000 hours of service.
The requirement that full-time compen-
sation be imputed, with a proportionate re-
duction based on an employee’s actual ser-
vice, is intended to ensure that a participant
is not disadvantaged by reason of choos-
ing phased retirement. This rule precludes
the need for extensive disclosure require-
ments,e.g., disclosure to alert participants
to rights that may be lost as a result of
participating in a phased retirement pro-
gram. To be consistent with the require-
ment to use full-time compensation, the
proposed regulations require an employee
who was a highly compensated employee
before commencing phased retirement to
be treated as a highly compensated em-
ployee during phased retirement. See also
§1.414(q)–1T, A–4 & A–5.
Under the proposed regulations, the
employee’s final retirement benefit is
comprised of the phased retirement ben-
efit and the balance of the employee’s
accrued benefit under the plan (i.e.,theex-
cess of the total plan formula benefit over
the portion of the accrued benefit paid as
a phased retirement benefit). Upon full
retirement, the phased retirement benefit
can continue unchanged or the plan is per-
mitted to offer a new election with respect
to that benefit.
This bifurcation is consistent with com-
mentators’ recommendation that an em-
ployee who is in a phased retirement pro-
gram has a dual status, under which the
employee is treated as retired to the extent
of the reduction in hours and is treated as
working to the extent of the employee’s
continued work with the employer. This
approach also ensures that a phased retire-
ment program offers an early retirement
subsidytotheextenttheemployeehasre-
duced his or her hours, and that the remain-
der of the employee’s benefit rights is not
adversely affected by participation in the
phased retirement program.
Testing and Adjustment of Payments
Subject to certain exceptions, the pro-
posed regulations require periodic testing
to ensure that employees in phased retire-
ment are in fact working at the reduced
schedule, as expected. Thus, unless an
exception applies, a plan must provide
for an annual comparison between the
number of hours actually worked by an
employee during a testing period and the
number of hours the employee was rea-
sonably expected to work. If the actual
hours worked during the testing period
are materially greater than the expected
number of hours, then the employee’s
phased retirement benefit must be re-
duced prospectively. For this purpose, the
employee’s hours worked are materially
greater than the employee’s work schedule
if they exceed either 133
1
/3percent of the
work schedule or 90 percent of the hours
that the employee would work under a
full-time schedule.
This annual comparison is not required
after the employee is within 3 months of
attaining normal retirement age or if the
amount of compensation paid to the em-
ployee by the employer during the phased
retirement testing period does not exceed
the compensation that would be paid to
the employee if he or she had worked full
time multiplied by the employee’s work
schedule fraction. Further, no comparison
is required during the first year of an em-
ployee’s phased retirement or if the em-
ployee has entered into an agreement with
the employer that the employee will retire
within 2 years.
In the event that the employer and em-
ployee agree to increase prospectively the
hours that the employee will work, then
the employee’s phased retirement benefit
must be adjusted based on a new work
schedule. The date of the agreement to in-
crease the employee’s hours is treated as a
comparison date for testing purposes.
In calculating the employee’s benefit at
full retirement, if an employee’s phased re-
2
Cf.,Edwards v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1989–409,aff’d, 906 F.2d 114 (4th Cir. 1990).
November 22, 20048592004–47 I.R.B.

tirement benefits have been reduced dur-
ing phased retirement, the employee’s ac-
crued benefit under the plan is offset by an
amount that is actuarially equivalent to the
additional payments made before the re-
duction. The potential for this offset, like
other material features of the phased re-
tirement optional form of benefit, must be
disclosed as part of the QJSA explanation
as required under §1.401(a)–20, Q&A–36,
and §1.417(a)(3)–1(c)(1)(v) and (d)(1).
If the employee’s phased retirement
benefit is less than the maximum amount
permitted or the employee’s work sched-
ule is further reduced at a later date,
the proposed regulations allow a plan to
provide one or more additional phased
retirement benefits to the employee. The
additional phased retirement benefit, com-
mencing a later annuity starting date,
provides flexibility to reflect future reduc-
tions in the employee’s work hours.
Provisions Relating to Payment After
Normal Retirement Age
The proposed regulations clarify that a
pensionplan(i.e., a defined benefit plan or
money purchase pension plan) is permit-
ted to pay benefits upon an employee’s at-
tainment of normal retirement age. How-
ever, normal retirement age cannot be set
so low as to be a subterfuge to avoid the re-
quirements of section 401(a), and, accord-
ingly, normal retirement age cannot be ear-
lier than the earliest age that is reasonably
representative of a typical retirement age
for the covered workforce.
3
Application to Plans Other Than Qualified
Pension Plans
The regulations that limit distributions
that are modified by these proposed reg-
ulations only apply to pension plans (i.e.,
defined benefit or money purchase pension
plans). Other types of plans may be subject
to less restrictive rules regarding in-ser-
vice distributions, including amounts held
in or attributable to: (1) qualified profit
sharing and stock bonus plans to the ex-
tent not attributable to elective deferrals
under section 401(k); (2) insurance an-
nuities under section 403(b)(1), and re-
tirement income accounts under section
403(b)(9), to the extent not attributable to
elective deferrals; (3) custodial accounts
under section 403(b)(7) to the extent not
attributable to elective deferrals; and (4)
elective deferrals under section 401(k) or
403(b). In general, these types of plans
are permitted to provide for distributions
after attainment of age 59
1
/2, without re-
gard to whether the employee has retired
or had a severance from employment. Ac-
cordingly, they may either provide for the
same phased retirement rules that are pro-
posed in these regulations or may provide
for other partial or full in-service distri-
butions to be available after attainment of
age 59
1
/2. However, eligible governmen-
tal plans under section 457(b) are not gen-
erally permitted to provide for payments
to be made before the earlier of sever-
ance from employment or attainment of
age 70
1
/2. See generally §1.457–6.
Other Issues
The proposed regulations also autho-
rize the Commissioner to issue additional
rules in guidance of general applicability
regarding the coordination of partial retire-
ment under a phased retirement program
and the plan qualification rules under sec-
tion 401(a).
These proposed regulations do not
address all of the issues that commenta-
tors raised in response to Notice 2002–43.
Thus, as noted above, the proposed regula-
tions do not address when a full retirement
occurs and specifically do not endorse
a prearranged termination and rehire as
constituting a full retirement. Further, the
proposed regulations only address certain
tax issues. For example, although com-
mentators pointed out that the continued
availability of health coverage would be
an important feature for employees in de-
ciding whether to participate in phased
retirement, the proposed regulations do
not include any rules relating to health
coverage. Similarly, the proposed regu-
lations do not address any potential age
discrimination issues, other than through
the requirement that participation in a
bona fidephased retirement program be
voluntary.
Proposed Effective Date
The rules in these regulations are pro-
posed to apply to plan years beginning on
or after the date of publication of the Trea-
sury decision adopting these rules as fi-
nal regulations in theFederal Register.
These proposed regulations cannot be re-
lied on before they are adopted as final reg-
ulations.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice
of proposed rulemaking is not a significant
regulatory action as defined in Executive
Order 12866. Therefore, a regulatory as-
sessment is not required. It also has been
determined that section 553(b) of the Ad-
ministrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chap-
ter 5) does not apply to these proposed
regulations, and, because these regulations
do not impose a collection of information
on small entities, the Regulatory Flexibil-
ity Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not ap-
ply. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the In-
ternal Revenue Code, this notice of pro-
posed rulemaking will be submitted to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration for comment on
its impact on small business.
Comments and Requests for a Public
Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are
adopted as final regulations, consideration
will be given to any written comments
(a signed original and eight (8) copies)
or electronic comments that are submitted
timely to the IRS. All comments will be
available for public inspection and copy-
ing.
Comments are specifically requested on
the following issues:
•Should eligibility to participate in a
phased retirement program be ex-
tended to employees that reduce their
workload using a standard, other than
counting hours, to identify the reduc-
tion, and, if so, are there administrable
methods for measuring the reduction?
•The proposed regulations require peri-
odic testing of the hours an employee
3
While a low normal retirement age may have a significant cost effect on a traditional defined benefit plan, this effect is not as significant for defined contribution plans or for hybrid defined
benefit plans.
2004–47 I.R.B.860November 22, 2004

actually works during phased retire-
ment, and if the hours are materially
greater than the employee’s phased
retirement work schedule, the phased
retirement benefit must be adjusted.
As discussed above (under the head-
ingTesting), there are a number of
exceptions to this requirement. Are
there other, less complex alternatives
that also would ensure that phased
retirement benefits correspond to the
employee’s reduction in hours?
•The proposed regulations require an
offset for the actuarial value of ad-
ditional payments made before a re-
duction in phased retirement benefits.
Should the regulations permit this off-
set to be calculated without regard to
any early retirement subsidy and, if so,
how should a subsidy be quantified?
•The proposed regulations clarify that
the right to receive a phased retirement
benefit as a partial payment is a sepa-
rate optional form of benefit for pur-
poses of section 411(d)(6) and, thus,
is a benefit, right, or feature for pur-
poses of the special nondiscrimination
rules at §1.401(a)(4)–4. Comments are
requested on whether there are facts
and circumstances under which the age
and service conditions for a particu-
lar employer’s phased retirement pro-
gram should be disregarded in apply-
ing §1.401(a)(4)–4 (even if the pro-
gram may only be in place for a tempo-
rary period), or under which the rules
at §1.401(a)(4)–4 should otherwise be
modified with respect to phased retire-
ment.
•Should any special rules be adopted to
coordinate the rules regarding distri-
butions and continued accruals during
phased retirement with a plan’s provi-
sions regarding employment after nor-
mal retirement age, such as suspension
of benefits?
A public hearing may be scheduled if
requestedinwritingbyapersonthattimely
submits written comments. If a public
hearing is scheduled, notice of the date,
time and place for the hearing will be pub-
lished in theFederal Register.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these proposed
regulations is Cathy A. Vohs of the Office
of the Division Counsel/Associate Chief
Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government
Entities). However, other personnel from
the IRS and Treasury participated in their
development.
*****
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for
part1isamendedbyaddingentriesinnu-
merical order to read in part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 1.401(a)–1 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 401.
Section 1.401(a)–3 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 401.
Par. 2. In §1.401(a)–1, paragraph
(b)(1)(i) is amended by adding text be-
fore the period at the end of the current
sentence and a new second sentence, and
paragraph (b)(1)(iv) to read as follows:
§1.401(a)–1 Post-ERISA qualified plans
and qualified trusts; in general.
*****
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(i)***orattainmentofnormalre-
tirement age. However, normal retirement
age cannot be set so low as to be a sub-
terfuge to avoid the requirements of sec-
tion 401(a), and, accordingly, normal re-
tirement age cannot be earlier than the ear-
liest age that is reasonably representative
of a typical retirement age for the covered
workforce.
*****
(iv) Benefits may not be distributed
prior to normal retirement age solely due
to a reduction in hours. However, not-
withstanding anything provided elsewhere
in paragraph (b) of thissection (including
the pre-ERISA rules under §1.401–1), an
employee may be treated as partially re-
tired for purposes of paragraph (b)(1)(i) of
this section to the extent provided under
§1.401(a)–3 relating to abona fidephased
retirement program.
*****
Par. 3. Section 1.401(a)–3 is added to
read as follows:
§1.401(a)–3 Benefits during phased
retirement.
(a)Introduction—(1)General rule.
Under section 401(a), a qualified pension
plan may provide for the distribution of
phased retirement benefits in accordance
with the limitations of this paragraph (a)
to the extent that an employee is partially
retired under abona fidephased retire-
ment program, as defined in paragraph (c)
of this section, provided the requirements
set forth in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this
section are satisfied.
(2)Limitation on benefits paid during
phased retirement period—(i)Benefits
limited to pro rata retirement benefit.The
phased retirement benefits paid during
the phased retirement period cannot ex-
ceed the phased retirement accrued benefit
payable in the optional form of benefit
applicable at the annuity starting date for
the employee’s phased retirement benefit.
(ii)Availability of early retirement sub-
sidies, etc. Except as provided in para-
graph (a)(2)(iii) of this section, all early
retirement benefits, retirement-type subsi-
dies, and optional forms of benefit avail-
able upon full retirement must be avail-
able with respect to the portion of an em-
ployee’s phased retirement accrued benefit
that is payable as a phased retirement ben-
efit.
(iii)Limitation on optional forms of
payment. Phased retirement benefits may
not be paid in the form of a single sum
or other form that constitutes an eligi-
ble rollover distribution under section
402(c)(4).
(3)Limited to full-time employees who
are otherwise eligible to commence ben-
efits. Phased retirement benefits are only
permitted to be made available to an em-
ployee who, prior to the phased retire-
ment period, normally maintains a full-
time work schedule and who would oth-
erwise be eligible to commence retirement
benefits immediately if he or she were to
fully retire.
(4)Authority of Commissioner to adopt
other rules. The Commissioner, in rev-
enue rulings, notices, or other guidance
November 22, 20048612004–47 I.R.B.

published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin
(see §601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter),
may adopt additional rules regarding the
coordination of partial retirement under a
phased retirement program and the quali-
fication rules of section 401(a).
(b)Definitions—(1)In general.The
definitions set forth in this paragraph (b)
apply for purposes of this section.
(2)Phased retirement program.The
termphased retirement programmeans a
written, employer-adopted program pur-
suant to which employees may reduce the
number of hours they customarily work
beginning on or after a date specified under
the program and commence phased retire-
ment benefits during the phased retirement
period, as provided under the plan.
(3)Phased retirement period.Theterm
phased retirement periodmeans the period
of time that the employee and employer
reasonably expect the employee to work
reduced hours under the phased retirement
program.
(4)Phased retirement accrued benefit.
The termphased retirement accrued bene-
fitmeans the portion of the employee’s ac-
crued benefit equal to the product of the
employee’s total accrued benefit on the
annuity starting date for the employee’s
phased retirement benefit, and one minus
the employee’s work schedule fraction.
(5)Phased retirement benefit.Theterm
phased retirement benefitmeans the ben-
efit paid to an employee upon the em-
ployee’s partial retirement under a phased
retirement program, based on some or all
of the employee’s phased retirement ac-
crued benefit, and payable in the optional
form of benefit applicable at the annuity
starting date.
(6)Work schedule. With respect to an
employee, the termwork schedulemeans
the number of hours the employee is rea-
sonably expected to work annually during
the phased retirement period (determined
in accordance with paragraph (c)(4) of this
section).
(7)Full-time work schedule.Withre-
spect to an employee, the termfull-time
work schedulemeans the number of hours
the employee would normally work during
a year if the employee were to work on a
full-time basis, determined in a reasonable
and consistent manner.
(8)Work schedule fraction.Withre-
spect to an employee, the termwork sched-
ule fractionmeans a fraction, the numera-
tor of which is the employee’s work sched-
ule and the denominator of which is the
employee’s full-time work schedule.
(c)Bona fide phased retirement pro-
gram—(1)Definition generally.Theterm
bona fide phased retirement program
means a phased retirement program that
satisfies paragraphs (c)(2) through (5) of
this section.
(2)Limitation to individuals who have
attained age 59
1
/2.Abona fidephased
retirement program must be limited to
employees who have attained age 59
1
/2.A
plan is permitted to impose additional re-
quirements for eligibility to participate in a
bona fidephased retirement program, such
as limiting eligibility to either employees
who have satisfied additional age or ser-
vice conditions (or combination thereof)
specified in the program or employees
whose benefit may not be distributed
without consent under section 411(a)(11).
(3)Participation must be voluntary.An
employee’s participation in abona fide
phased retirement program must be volun-
tary.
(4)Reduction in hours requirement.An
employee who participates in abona fide
phased retirement program must reason-
ably be expected (by both the employer
and employee) to reduce, by 20 percent or
more, the number of hours the employee
customarily works. This requirement is
satisfied if the employer and employee en-
ter into an agreement, in good faith, under
which they agree that the employee will re-
duce, by 20 percent or more, the number
of hours the employee works during the
phased retirement period.
(5)Limited to employees who are not
key-employee owners. Phased retirement
benefits are not permitted to be made avail-
able to a key employee who is described in
section 416(i)(1)(A)(ii) or (iii).
(d)Conditions for commencement of
phased retirement benefit—(1)Imputed
accruals based on full-time schedule—(i)
General rule. During the phased retire-
ment period, in addition to being entitled to
payment of the phased retirement benefit,
the employee must be entitled to partici-
pate in the plan in the same manner as if
the employee still maintained a full-time
work schedule (including calculation of
average earnings, imputation of compen-
sation in accordance with §1.414(s)–1(f),
and imputation of service in accordance
with the service-crediting rules under
§1.401(a)(4)–11(d)), and must be enti-
tled to the same benefits (including early
retirement benefits, retirement-type sub-
sidies, and optional forms of benefits)
upon full retirement as a similarly situated
employee who has not elected phased re-
tirement, except that the years of service
credited under the plan for any plan year
during the phased retirement period is de-
termined under paragraph (d)(1)(ii) or (iii)
of this section, whichever is applicable.
(ii)Method for crediting years of ser-
vice for full plan years. The years of ser-
vice credited under the plan for any full
plan year during the phased retirement pe-
riodismultipliedbyanadjustmentratio
that is equal to the ratio of the employee’s
actual hours worked during that year to
the number of hours that would be worked
by the employee during that year under a
full-time work schedule. Alternatively, on
a reasonable and consistent basis, the ad-
justment ratio may be based on the ratio of
an employee’s actual compensation during
the year to the compensation that would
be paid to the employee during the year if
he or she had maintained a full-time work
schedule.
(iii)Method for crediting years of ser-
vice for partial plan years. In the case
of a plan year only a portion of which is
during a phased retirement period for an
employee, the method described in para-
graphs (d)(1)(i) and (ii) of this section is
applied with respect to that portion of the
plan year. Thus, for example, if an em-
ployee works full time until October 1 of
a calendar plan year and works one-third
time from October 1 through December 31
of the year, then the employee is credited
with 10 months for that year (9 months
plus
1
/3of 3 months).
(2)Ancillary benefits during phased re-
tirement period—(i)Death benefits.Ifan
employee dies while receiving phased re-
tirement benefits, death benefits are allo-
cated between the phased retirement ben-
efit and the benefit that would be payable
upon subsequent full retirement. See also
§1.401(a)–20, A–9. Thus, if an employee
dies after the annuity starting date for the
phased retirement benefit, death benefits
are paid with respect to the phased retire-
ment benefit in accordance with the op-
tional form elected for that benefit, and
death benefits are paid with respect to the
remainder of the employee’s benefit in ac-
2004–47 I.R.B.862November 22, 2004

cordance with the plan’s provisions re-
garding death during employment.
(ii)Other ancillary benefits.Totheex-
tent provided under the terms of the plan,
ancillary benefits, other than death bene-
fits described in paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this
section, are permitted to be provided dur-
ing the phased retirement period.
(3)Calculation of benefit at full retire-
ment—(i)In general. Upon full retire-
ment following partial retirement under
a phased retirement program, the em-
ployee’s total accrued benefit under the
plan (including the employee’s accruals
during the phased retirement period, de-
termined in accordance with paragraph
(d)(1) of this section) is offset by the por-
tion of the employee’s phased retirement
accrued benefit that is being distributed as
a phased retirement benefit at the time of
full retirement.
(ii)Adjustment for prior payments.
If, before full retirement, the employee’s
phased retirement benefit has been re-
duced under paragraph (d)(4) of this sec-
tion, then the employee’s accrued benefit
under the plan is also offset upon full re-
tirement by an amount that is actuarially
equivalent to the phased retirement bene-
fit payments that have been made during
the phased retirement period that were
not made with respect to the portion of
the phased retirement accrued benefit that
is applied as an offset under paragraph
(d)(3)(i) of this section at the time of full
retirement.
(iii)Election of optional form with re-
spect to net benefit. Upon full retirement,
an employee is entitled to elect, in accor-
dance with section 417, an optional form of
benefit with respect to the net accrued ben-
efit determined under paragraph (d)(3)(i)
and (ii) of this section.
(iv)New election permitted for phased
retirement benefit. A plan is permitted to
provide that, upon full retirement, an em-
ployee may elect, in accordance with sec-
tion 417 and without regard to paragraph
(a)(2)(iii) of this section, a new optional
form of benefit with respect to the portion
of the phased retirement accrued benefit
that is being distributed as a phased retire-
ment benefit. Any such new optional form
of benefit is calculated at the time of full
retirement as the actuarial equivalent of the
future phased retirement benefits (without
offset for the phased retirement benefits
previously paid).
(4) Prospective reduction in phased
retirement benefit if hours are materi-
ally greater than expected—(i)General
rule. Except as otherwise provided in this
paragraph (d)(4), a plan must compare
annually the number of hours actually
worked by an employee during the phased
retirement testing period and the number
of hours the employee was reasonably
expected to work during the testing period
for purposes of calculating the work sched-
ule fraction. For this purpose, the phased
retirement testing period is the 12 months
preceding the comparison date (or such
longer period permitted under paragraph
(d)(4)(iv) of this section, or any shorter
period that applies if there is a compari-
son date as a result of an agreed increase
under paragraph (d)(4)(vi) of this section).
In the event that the actual hours worked
(determined on an annual basis) during the
phased retirement testing period exceeds
the work schedule, then, except as pro-
vided in paragraph (d)(4)(ii) or (v) of this
section, the employee’s phased retirement
benefit must be reduced in accordance
with the method provided in paragraph
(d)(4)(iii) of this section, effective as of an
adjustment date specified in the plan that
is not more than 3 months later than the
comparison date.
(ii)Permitted variance in hours.Aplan
is not required to reduce the phased re-
tirement benefit unless the hours worked
during the phased retirement testing period
are materially greater than the hours that
would be expected to be worked under the
work schedule. For this purpose, the em-
ployee’s hours worked (determined on an-
nual basis) are materially greater than the
employee’s work schedule if either—
(A) The employee’s hours worked (de-
termined on an annual basis) are more
than 133
1
/3percent of the employee’s
work schedule; or
(B) The employee’shours worked (de-
termined on an annual basis) exceed 90
percent of the full-time work schedule.
(iii)Adjustment method. If a phased
retirement benefit must be reduced under
paragraph (d)(4) of this section, a new
(i.e., reduced) phased retirement benefit
must be calculated as provided in this para-
graph (d)(4)(iii). First, an adjusted work
schedule is determined. The adjusted work
schedule is an annual schedule based on
the number of hours the employee actu-
ally worked during the phased retirement
testing period. The adjusted work sched-
ule is applied to the employee’s accrued
benefit that was used to calculate the prior
phased retirement benefit. This results
in a new phased retirement accrued ben-
efit for purposes of paragraph (b)(4) of
this section. Second, a new phased re-
tirement benefit is determined, based on
the new phased retirement accrued bene-
fit and payable in the same optional form
of benefit (i.e., using the same annuity
starting date and the same early retirement
factor and other actuarial adjustments) as
the prior phased retirement benefit. If
an employee is receiving more than one
phased retirement benefit (as permitted un-
der paragraph (e)(2) of this section) and
a reduction is required under paragraph
(d)(4) of this section, then the reduction
is applied first to the most recently com-
mencing phased retirement benefit (and
then, if necessary, to the next most recent
phased retirement benefit, etc.).
(iv)Comparison date for phased retire-
ment testing period. The comparison date
is any date chosen by the employer on a
reasonable and consistent basis and spec-
ified in the plan, such as the last day of
the plan year, December 31, or the anniver-
sary of the annuity starting date for the em-
ployee’s phased retirement benefit. As an
alternative to testing the hours worked dur-
ing the 12 months preceding the compar-
ison date, the plan may, on a reasonable
and consistent basis, provide that the com-
parison of actual hours worked to the work
schedule be based on a cumulative period
that exceeds 12 months beginning with ei-
ther the annuity starting date for the em-
ployee’s phased retirement benefit or any
later date specified in the plan.
(v)Exceptions to comparison require-
ment—(A)In general. The comparison of
hours described in paragraph (d)(4) of this
section is not required in the situations set
forth in this paragraph (d)(4)(v).
(B)Employees recently commencing
phased retirement. No comparison is re-
quired for an employee who commenced
phased retirement benefits within the
12-month period preceding the compari-
son date.
(C)Employees with short phased retire-
ment periods. No comparison is required
during the first 2 years of an employee’s
phased retirement period if—
(1) The employee has entered into an
agreement with the employer under which
November 22, 20048632004–47 I.R.B.

the employee’s phased retirement period
will not exceed 2 years and the employee
will fully retire at the end of such period;
and
(2) The employee fully retires after a
phased retirement period not in excess of
2 years.
(D)Employees with proportional pay
reduction. No comparison is required for
any phased retirement testing period if the
amount of compensation paid to the em-
ployee during that period does not exceed
the compensation that would be paid to the
employee if he or she had maintained a
full-time work schedule multiplied by the
work schedule fraction.
(E)Employees at or after normal retire-
ment age. No comparison is required for
any phased retirement testing period end-
ing within 3 months before the employee’s
normal retirement age or any time there-
after.
(vi)Agreement to increase hours—(A)
General rule. In the event that the em-
ployer and the employee agree to increase
prospectively the hours under the em-
ployee’s work schedule prior to normal
retirement age, then, notwithstanding
the exceptions provided in paragraphs
(d)(4)(v)(B) through (D) of this section,
the plan must treat the effective date of
the agreement to increase the employee’s
hours as a comparison date for purposes
of paragraph (d)(4)(iv) of this section. For
purposes of this paragraph (d)(4)(vi), with
respect to an employee, the termnew work
schedulemeans the greater of the actual
number of hours the employee worked
(determined on an annual basis) during the
prior phased retirement testing period or
the annual number of hours the employee
reasonably expects to work under the new
agreement.
(B)Required adjustments.Iftheem-
ployee’s hours under the new work sched-
ule are materially greater (within the
meaning of paragraph (d)(4)(ii) of this
section) than the hours the employee
would be expected to work (based on
the employee’s prior work schedule),
the employer is required to reduce the
employee’s phased retirement benefit, ef-
fective as of the date of the increase, based
on the new work schedule. In this case,
the employee’s new work schedule is used
for future comparisons under paragraph
(d)(4) of this section.
(C)Permitted adjustments.Iftheem-
ployee’s hours under the new work sched-
ule are not materiallygreater (within the
meaning of paragraph (d)(4)(ii) of this sec-
tion) than the hours the employee would be
expected to work (based on the employee’s
prior work schedule), the employer is per-
mitted, but not required, to reduce the em-
ployee’s phased retirement benefit, effec-
tive as of the date of the increase, based on
the new work schedule. If the benefit is so
reduced, the employee’s new work sched-
ule is used for future comparisons under
paragraph (d)(4) of this section. If the em-
ployee’s phased retirement benefit is not
so reduced, future comparisons are deter-
mined using the employee’s prior work
schedule.
(e)Other rules—(1)Highly compen-
sated employees. An employee who par-
tially retires under a phased retirement pro-
gram and who was a highly compensated
employee, as defined in section 414(q),
immediately before the partial retirement
is considered to be a highly compensated
employee during the phased retirement pe-
riod, without regard to the compensation
actually paid to the employee during the
phased retirement period.
(2)Multiple phased retirement bene-
fits permitted—(i)In general.Aplanis
permitted to provide one or more addi-
tional phased retirement benefits prospec-
tively to an employee who is receiving a
phased retirement benefit if the conditions
set forth in paragraph (e)(2)(ii) of this sec-
tion are satisfied. At the later annuity start-
ing date for the additional phased retire-
ment benefit, the additional phased retire-
ment benefits may not exceed the amount
permitted to be paid based on the excess
of—
(A) The employee’s phased retirement
accrued benefit at the later annuity starting
date, over
(B) The portion of the employee’s
phased retirement accrued benefit at the
earlier annuity starting date that is being
distributed as a phased retirement benefit.
(ii)Conditions. The additional phased
retirement benefit described in paragraph
(e)(2)(i) of this section may be provided
only if—
(A) The prior phased retirement benefit
was not based on the employee’s entire
phased retirement accrued benefit at the
annuity starting date for the prior phased
retirement benefit, or
(B) The employee’s work schedule at
the later annuity starting date is less than
the employee’s work schedule that was
used to calculate the prior phased retire-
ment benefit.
(3)Application of section 411(d)(6).In
accordance with §1.411(d)–4, A–1(b)(1),
the right to receive a partial distribution of
an employee’s accrued benefit as a phased
retirement benefit is treated as an optional
form of payment that is separate from the
right to receive a full distribution of the
accrued benefit upon full retirement.
(4)Application of nondiscrimination
rules. The right to receive a phased retire-
ment benefit is a benefit, right, or feature
that is subject to §1.401(a)(4)–4.
(f)Examples. The following examples
illustrate the application of this section:
Example 1.(i)Employer’s Plans.PlanX(asin
effect prior to amendment to reflect the phased re-
tirement program described below) is a defined ben-
efit plan maintained by Employer M. Plan X pro-
vides an accrued benefit of 1.5% of the average of an
employee’s highest three years of pay (based on the
highest 36 consecutive months of pay), times years
of service (with 1,000 hours of service required for
a year of service), payable as a life annuity begin-
ning at age 65. Plan X permits employees to elect
to commence actuarially reduced distributions at any
time after the later of termination of employment or
attainment of age 50, except that if an employee re-
tires after age 55 and completion of 20 years of ser-
vice, the applicable reduction is only 3% per year for
the years between ages 65 and 62 and 6% per year for
the years between ages 62 to 55. Plan X permits em-
ployees to select, with spousal consent, a single life
annuity, a joint and contingent annuity with the em-
ployee having the right to select any beneficiary and
a continuation percentage of 50%, 75%, or 100%, or
a 10-year certain and life annuity.
(ii)Phased Retirement Program.EmployerM
adopts a voluntary phased retirement program that
will only be available for employees who retire dur-
ing the two-year period from February 1, 2006, to
January 31, 2008. The program will not be avail-
able to employees who are not entitled to an imme-
diate pension or who are 1 percent owners. Em-
ployer M has determined that employees typically be-
gin to retire after attainment of age 55 with at least 15
years of service. Accordingly, to increase retention
of certain employees, the program will provide that
employees in certain specified work positions who
have reached age 59
1
/2and completed 15 years of
service may elect phased retirement. The program
permits phased retirement to be implemented through
a reduction of 25%, 50%, or 75% in the number of
hours expected to be worked for up to 5 years fol-
lowing phased retirement (other reduced schedules
may be elected with the approval of M), with the em-
ployee’s compensation during the phased retirement
period to be based on what a similar full-time em-
ployee would be paid, reduced by the applicable per-
centage reduction in hoursexpected to be worked.
In order to participate in the program, the employee
and the employer must enter into an agreement under
2004–47 I.R.B.864November 22, 2004

which the employee will reduce his or her hours ac-
cordingly. The agreement also provides that the em-
ployee’s compensation during phased retirement will
be reduced by that same percentage. The program is
announced to employees in the fall of 2005.
(iii)Plan Provisions Regarding Phased Retire-
ment Benefit. (A) Plan X is amended, prior to Febru-
ary 1, 2006, to provide that an employee who elects
phased retirement under M’s phased retirement pro-
gram is permitted to commence benefits with respect
to a portion of his or her accrued retirement bene-
fit (the employee’s phased retirement accrued bene-
fit), based on the applicable percentage reduction in
hours expected to be worked. For example, for a 25%
reduction in hours, the employee is entitled to com-
mence benefits with respect to 25% of his or her ac-
crued benefit. Plan X permits an employee who com-
mences phased retirement to elect, with spousal con-
sent, from any of the optional forms provided under
the plan.
(B) During the phased retirement period, the em-
ployee will continue to accrue benefits (without re-
gard to the plan’s 1,000 hour requirement), with his
or her pay for purposes of calculating benefits un-
der Plan X increased by the ratio of 100 percent to
the percentage of full-time pay that will be paid dur-
ing phased retirement and with the employee’s ser-
vice credit to be equal to the product of the same per-
centage times the service credit that would apply if
the employee were working full time. Upon the em-
ployee’s subsequent full retirement, his or her total
accrued benefit will be based on the resulting high-
est three years of pay and total years of service, offset
by the phased retirementaccrued benefit. The retire-
ment benefit payable upon subsequent full retirement
is in addition to the phased retirement benefit. Plan
X does not provide for a new election with respect to
the phased retirement benefit.
(C) In the case of death during the phased retire-
ment period, the employee will be treated as a former
employee to the extent of his or her phased retirement
benefit and as an active employee to the extent of the
retirement benefit that would be due upon full retire-
ment.
(D) Because the terms of the phased retirement
program provide that the employee’s compensation
during phased retirement will be reduced by that same
percentage as applies to calculate phased retirement
benefits, Plan X does not have provisions requiring
annual testing of hours actually worked.
(iv)Application to a Specific Employee—(A)
Phased retirement benefit. Employee E is age 59
1
/2
with 20 years of credited service. Employee E’s
compensation is $90,000, and E’s highest three
years of pay is $85,000. Employee E elects phased
retirement on April 1, 2006, and elects to reduce
hours by 50% beginning on July 1, 2006. Thus,
E’s annuity starting date for the phased retirement
benefit is July 1, 2006. Employee E’s total accrued
benefit as of July 1, 2006, as a single life annuity
payable at normal retirement age is equal to $25,500
per year (1.5% times $85,000 times 20 years of
service). Thus, Employee E’s phased retirement
accrued benefit as of July 1, 2006, as a single life
annuity payable at normal retirement age is equal to
$12,750 per year ($25,500 times 1 minus E’s work
schedule fraction of 50%). Accordingly, Employee
E’s phased retirement benefit payable as a straight
life annuity commencing on July 1, 2006, is equal to
$9,690 per year ($12,750 per year times 76% (100%
minus the applicable reduction for early retirement
equal to 3% for 3 years and 6% for an additional 2
1
/2
years)). Employee E elects a joint and 50% survivor
annuity, with E’s spouse as the contingent annuitant.
Under Plan X, the actuarial factor for this form of
benefit is 90%, so E’s benefit is $8,721 per year.
(B)Death during phased retirement.If Employee
E were to die on or after July 1, 2006, and before sub-
sequent full retirement, E’s spouse would be entitled
to a 50% survivor annuity based on the joint and 50%
survivor annuity being paid to E, plus a qualified pre-
retirement survivor annuity that complies with sec-
tion 417 with respect to the additional amount that
would be paid to E if he or she had fully retired on
the date of E’s death.
(C)Subsequent full retirement benefit.Three
years later, Employee E fully retires from Employer
M. Throughout this period, E’s compensation has
been 50% of the compensation that would have
been paid to E if he or she were working full time.
Consequently, no adjustment in E’s phased retire-
ment benefit is required. E’s highest consecutive
36 months of compensation would be $95,000 if E
had not elected phased retirement and E has been
credited with 1
1
/2years of service credit for the 3
years of phased retirement (.50 times 3 years). Ac-
cordingly, prior to offset for E’s phased retirement
accrued benefit, E’s total accrued benefit as of July
1, 2009, as a single life annuity commencing at nor-
mal retirement age is equal to $30,637.50 per year
($95,000 times 1.5% times 21.5 years of service)
and, after the offset for E’sphased retirement accrued
benefit, E’s retirement benefit as a single life annuity
commencing at normal retirement age is equal to
$17,887.50 ($30,637.50 minus $12,750). Thus, the
amount of E’s additional early retirement benefit
payable as a straight life annuity at age 62
1
/2is equal
to $16,545.94 per year ($17,887.50 per year times
92.5% (100% minus 3% for 2
1
/2years)). Employee
E elects, with spousal consent, a 10-year certain
and life annuity that applies to the remainder of E’s
accrued benefit. This annuity is in addition to the
previously elected joint and 50% survivor annuity
payable as E’s phased retirement benefit.
Example 2.(i)Same Plan and Phased Retire-
ment Program, Except Annual Testing Required.The
facts with respect to the Plan X and M’s phased retire-
ment program are the same as inExample 1, except
that the program does not provide that the employee’s
compensation during phased retirement will be re-
duced by that same percentage as is applied to calcu-
late phased retirement benefits, but instead the com-
pensation depends on the number of hours worked
by the employee. Plan X provides for annual test-
ing on a calendar year basis and for an employee’s
phased retirement benefit to be reduced proportion-
ately if the hours worked exceed a threshold, under
provisions which reflect the variance permitted para-
graph (d)(4)(ii) of this section.
(ii)Employee Has Small Increase in Hours.The
facts with respect to Employee E are the same as in
Example 1, except that E’s full time work schedule
would result in 2,000 hours worked annually, E’s
work schedule fraction is 50%, and E works 500
hours from July 1, 2006, through December 31,
2006, 1,000 hours in 2007, 1,200 hours in 2008, and
600 hours from January 1, 2009, through E’s full
retirement on June 30, 2009.
(iii)Application of Testing Rules. No comparison
of hours is required for the partial testing period that
occurs in 2006. For 2007, no reduction is required in
E’s phased retirement benefit as a result of the hours
worked by E during 2007 because the hours did not
exceed E’s work schedule (50% of 2,000). For 2008,
although the hours worked by E exceeded E’s work
schedule, no reduction is required because the hours
worked in 2008 were not materially greater than E’s
work schedule (1,200 is not more than the variance
permitted under paragraph (d)(4)(ii) of this section,
which is 133
1
/3% of 1,000). E’s total accrued benefit
upon E’s retirement on July 1, 2009, would be based
on 21.65 years of service to reflect the actual hours
worked from July 1, 2006, through June 30, 2009.
Example 3.(i)Same Plan and Phased Retirement
Program, Except Material Increase in Hours.The
facts with respect to the Plan X and M’s phased re-
tirement program are the same as inExample 2,ex-
cept E works 1,400 hours in 2008 and 700 hours in
the first half of 2009.
(ii)Application of Testing Rules. No comparison
of hours is required for the partial testing period that
occurs in 2006. For 2007, no reduction is required in
E’s phased retirement benefit as a result of the hours
worked by E during 2007 because the hours did not
exceed 50% of 2,000. However, the hours worked by
E during 2008 exceed 133
1
/3% of E’s work schedule
(50% of 2,000), so that the phased retirement benefit
paid to E during 2009 must be reduced. The reduction
is effective March 1, 2009. The new phased retire-
ment benefit of $5,232.60 is based on 30% of the par-
ticipant’s accrued benefit as of July 1, 2006, payable
as a joint and 50% survivor annuity commencing on
that date (30% times $25,500 times the early retire-
ment factor of 76% times the joint and 50% factor of
90%). This is equivalent to reducing the previously
elected joint and 50% survivor annuity payable with
respect to E by 40% (400 “excess” hours divided by
the 1,000 hour expected reduction). When E retires
fully on July 1, 2009, E’s total accrued benefit as of
July 1, 2009, as a single life annuity commencing at
normal retirement age is $31,065 per year ($95,000
times 1.5% times 21.8 years of service). This accrued
benefit is offset by (A) E’s phased retirement accrued
benefit (which is $7,650 (600 divided by 2,000 times
$25,500)) plus (B) the actuarial equivalent of 40% of
the payments that were made to E from January 1,
2008, through February 28, 2009.
Example 4.(i)Same Plan and Phased Retirement
Program, Except Employer and Employee Agree to
Decrease Hours. The facts with respect to the Plan
X and M’s phased retirement program are the same
as inExample 2, except before 2008, E enters into an
agreement with M to decrease E’s number of hours
worked from 50% of full time to 25% of full time. E
works 500 hours in 2008 and 250 hours in 2009.
(ii)Application of Multiple Benefit Rule.Under
paragraph (e)(2) of this section, Plan M may pro-
vide for an additional phased retirement benefit to
be offered to E for 2008. The maximum increase
would be for the phased retirement benefit paid to
E during 2009 to be increased based on a phased
retirement accrued benefit equal to 75% of E’s ac-
crued benefit (1,500 divided by 2,000). Thus, the
amount being paid to E would be increased, effec-
tive January 1, 2008, based on the excess of 75%
of E’s total accrued benefit on December 31, 2007,
over E’s original phased retirement accrued benefit of
November 22, 20048652004–47 I.R.B.

$12,750. Employee E would have the right to elect,
with spousal consent, any annuity form offered un-
der Plan X (with the actuarial adjustment for time of
commencement and form of payment to be based on
the age of E and any contingent beneficiary (and E’s
service, if applicable) on June 1, 2008), which would
be in addition to the previously elected joint and 50%
survivor annuity payable as E’s original phased re-
tirement benefit. When E retires fully on July 1, 2009,
Employee E’s total accrued benefit as of July 1, 2009,
would be offset by (A) E’s original phased retirement
accrued benefit plus (B) the phased retirement ac-
crued benefit for which additional phased retirement
benefits were payable beginning in 2008.
(g)Effective date.Therulesofthissec-
tion apply to plan years beginning on or af-
ter the date of publication of the Treasury
decision adopting these rules as final reg-
ulations in theFederal Register.
Mark E. Matthews,
Deputy Commissioner for
Services and Enforcement.
(Filed by the Office of the Federal Register on November 9,
2004, 8:45 a.m., and published in the issue of the Federal
Register for November 10, 2004, 69 F.R. 65108)
Announcement of Disciplinary Actions Involving
Attorneys, Certified Public Accountants, Enrolled Agents,
and Enrolled Actuaries — Suspensions, Censures,
Disbarments, and Resignations
Announcement 2004-95
Under Title 31, Code of Federal Regu-
lations, Part 10, attorneys, certified public
accountants, enrolled agents, and enrolled
actuaries may not accept assistance from,
or assist, any person who is under disbar-
ment or suspension from practice before
the Internal Revenue Service if the assis-
tance relates to a matter constituting prac-
tice before the Internal Revenue Service
and may not knowingly aid or abet another
person to practice before the Internal Rev-
enue Service during a period of suspen-
sion, disbarment, or ineligibility of such
other person.
To enable attorneys, certified public
accountants, enrolled agents, and enrolled
actuaries to identify persons to whom
these restrictions apply, the Director, Of-
fice of Professional Responsibility, will
announce in the Internal Revenue Bulletin
their names, their city and state, their pro-
fessional designation, the effective date
of disciplinary action, and the period of
suspension. This announcement will ap-
pear in the weekly Bulletin at the earliest
practicable date after such action and will
continue to appear in the weekly Bulletins
for five successive weeks.
Consent Suspensions From Practice Before the Internal
Revenue Service
Under Title 31, Code of Federal Regu-
lations, Part 10, an attorney, certified pub-
lic accountant, enrolled agent, or enrolled
actuary, in order to avoid institution or con-
clusion of a proceeding for his or her dis-
barment or suspension from practice be-
fore the Internal Revenue Service, may of-
fer his or her consent to suspension from
such practice. The Director, Office of Pro-
fessional Responsibility, in his discretion,
may suspend an attorney, certified public
accountant, enrolled agent, or enrolled ac-
tuary in accordance with the consent of-
fered.
The following individuals have been
placed under consent suspension from
practice before the Internal Revenue Ser-
vice:
NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Sanchez, Wayne L.Derby, KSAttorneyIndefinite
from
July 12, 2004
Gatti, John T.Orlando, FLEnrolled AgentIndefinite
from
July 16, 2004
2004–47 I.R.B.866November 22, 2004

NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Hall, Beverly J.Newberg, OREnrolled AgentIndefinite
from
July 26, 2004
Spencer, Robert E.Wilmington,NCEnrolled AgentIndefinite
from
August 11, 2004
Lebaron, Betty J.Mesa, AZEnrolled AgentIndefinite
from
August 17, 2004
Worrell, DouglasStreamwood, ILAttorneyIndefinite
from
August 23, 2004
Singleton, Stan R.Derby, KSAttorneyIndefinite
from
August 30, 2004
Halpern, BarbaraWeston, CTCPAIndefinite
from
September 15, 2004
Johnson, Jeanne M.Hoquiam, WAEnrolled AgentIndefinite
from
September 27, 2004
Fisher, RobertHolbrook, AZEnrolled AgentIndefinite
from
October 5, 2004
Valdez II, ArthurAlbuquerque, NMCPAIndefinite
from
October 19, 2004
Wilshire Jr., Raymond B.Fort Worth, TXEnrolled AgentIndefinite
from
December 1, 2004
Expedited Suspensions From Practice Before the Internal
Revenue Service
Under Title 31, Code of Federal Regu-
lations, Part 10, the Director, Office of Pro-
fessional Responsibility, is authorized to
immediately suspend from practice before
the Internal RevenueService any practi-
tioner who, within five years from the date
the expedited proceeding is instituted (1)
has had a license to practice as an attor-
ney, certified public accountant, or actuary
suspended or revoked for cause or (2) has
been convicted of certain crimes.
The following individuals have been
placed under suspension from practice be-
fore the Internal Revenue Service by virtue
of the expedited proceeding provisions:
NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Daly, Thomas J.Elmsford, NYCPAIndefinite
from
August 20, 2004
November 22, 20048672004–47 I.R.B.

NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Jewett, Jerry A.Fremont, OHAttorneyIndefinite
from
September 8, 2004
Kyllo, Harry N.Portland, ORCPAIndefinite
from
September 9, 2004
Pearl, David S.Reisterstown, MDAttorneyIndefinite
from
September 21, 2004
Graugnard, Paul E.Alexandria, LAAttorneyIndefinite
from
September 21, 2004
Thomas, Robert C.Natchitoches, LAAttorneyIndefinite
from
September 21, 2004
Culver Jr., Allan J.Bel Air, MDAttorneyIndefinite
from
September 21, 2004
Christovich, MichaelNew Orleans, LAAttorneyIndefinite
from
September 27, 2004
Turner, Haiden W.Farmers Branch, TXCPAIndefinite
from
September 27, 2004
Tuttle, HeidiUnionville, CTAttorneyIndefinite
from
September 27, 2004
Oberhauser Jr., LouisWayzata, MNAttorneyIndefinite
from
September 27, 2004
Nelson, John A.Wilmar, MNAttorneyIndefinite
from
September 27, 2004
Judd Jr., John K.Taft, CACPAIndefinite
from
September 30, 2004
McGrady, Michael S.Hankins, NYAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 1, 2004
Wahl-Taylor, KimberlyCouncil Bluffs, IAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 4, 2004
Haneberg III, Elmer C.W.Chicago, ILAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 6, 2004
2004–47 I.R.B.868November 22, 2004

NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
McDonald, Michael G.Methuen, MAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 6, 2004
Mason Jr., MauriceDracut,MAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 6, 2004
Aaron, Stanley R.Baton Rouge, LAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 6, 2004
McFarland, Sheila E.Chicago, ILAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 6, 2004
Deutchman, Murray L.Barnesville, MDAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 6, 2004
Wolfert, Marvin L.Foxboro, MAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 6, 2004
Andricopoulos, MaureenChelmsford, MAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 6, 2004
Ezuruike, MauriceAustin, TXAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 6, 2004
Jones, Thomas C.Dekalb, ILAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 6, 2004
Yopp, L. GregoryLouisville, KYAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 6, 2004
Waples, Alan N.Burlington, IAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 6, 2004
Ghitelman, Gayle S.Brookline, MAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 6, 2004
Bulas Jr., LuisHollywood, FLEnrolled AgentIndefinite
from
October 15, 2004
Earl, Thomas J.Moses Lake, WAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 8, 2004
George, Gary R.Milwaukee, WIAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 8, 2004
Jordan, David M.San Antonio, TXAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 8, 2004
November 22, 20048692004–47 I.R.B.

NameAddressDesignationDate of Suspension
Young III, George G.Havertown, PAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 8, 2004
Tanner, MartinSalt Lake City, UTAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 8, 2004
Jensen, GeorgCheyenne, WYAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 8, 2004
Slowiaczek, Peter A.Lakewood, WAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 8, 2004
Fennell, David E.New Castle, WAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 8, 2004
Gish, RobertBasin, WYAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 8, 2004
Ramirez, SilverioRoselle, NJAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 8, 2004
Flaherty, Patrick J.Traverse City, MICPAIndefinite
from
October 19, 2004
Vanden Berg, StevenMason City, IAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 25, 2004
Johnson, Jamis M.Salt Lake City, UTAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 25, 2004
Braskey, James F.Frostburg, MDAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 25, 2004
Mills, Laurence A.Wellesley, MAAttorneyIndefinite
from
October 26, 2004
2004–47 I.R.B.870November 22, 2004

Censure Issued by Consent
Under Title 31, Code of Federal Reg-
ulations, Part 10, in lieu of a proceeding
being instituted or continued, an attorney,
certified public accountant, enrolled agent,
or enrolled actuary, may offer his or her
consent to the issuance of a censure. Cen-
sure is a public reprimand.
The following individuals have con-
sented to the issuance of a Censure:
NameAddressDesignationDate of Censure
Dayandayan, Angel Y.Irvine, CAEnrolled AgentJuly 27, 2004
Summers, Todd W.Stockton, CAEnrolled AgentAugust 10, 2004
Barrett Sr., Jeffrey J.Catskill, NYCPAAugust 31, 2004
Davis, Charles W.San Francisco, CAEnrolled AgentSeptember 28, 2004
Giles, Benjamin M.Wichita, KSCPASeptember 30, 2004
Suspensions From Practice Before the Internal Revenue
Service After Notice and an Opportunity for a Proceeding
Under Title 31, Code of Federal Reg-
ulations, Part 10, after notice and an op-
portunity for a proceeding before an ad-
ministrative law judge, the following indi-
viduals have been placed under suspension
from practice before the Internal Revenue
Service:
NameAddressDesignationEffective Date
Lim, Edgar E.St. Louis, MOAttorneyAugust 2, 2004
to
July 31, 2007
Resignations of Enrolled Agents
Under Title 31, Code of Federal Regu-
lations, Part 10, an enrolled agent, in or-
der to avoid the institution or conclusion
of a proceeding for his or her disbarment
or suspension from practice before the In-
ternal Revenue Service, may offer his or
her resignation as an enrolled agent. The
Director, Office of Professional Responsi-
bility, in his discretion, may accept the of-
fered resignation.
The Director, Office of Professional
Responsibility, has accepted offers of res-
ignation as an enrolled agent from the
following individuals:
NameAddressDate of Resignation
Gleason, Daniel J.Franklin, TNSeptember 30, 2004
November 22, 20048712004–47 I.R.B.

Consent Disbarment From Practice Before the Internal
Revenue Service
Under Title 31, Code of Federal Regu-
lations, Part 10, an attorney, certified pub-
lic accountant, enrolled agent, or enrolled
actuary, in order to avoid institution or con-
clusion of a proceeding for his or her dis-
barment or suspension from practice be-
fore the Internal Revenue Service, may of-
fer his or her consent to disbarment from
such practice. The Director, Office of Pro-
fessional Responsibility, in his discretion,
may disbar an attorney, certified public ac-
countant, enrolled agent, or enrolled actu-
ary in accordance with the consent offered.
The following individuals have been
placed under consent disbarment from
practice before the Internal Revenue Ser-
vice:
NameAddressDesignationDate of Disbarment
Fort, Gala J.Las Vegas, NVCPAIndefinite
from
October 19, 2004
New Code Y for the 2005
Form W–2, Box 12
Announcement 2004–96
PurposeThe purpose of this announcement is to advise employers about an additional code for use on the 2005
Form W–2. This code will be used to identify annual deferrals of income under a nonqualified deferred
compensation plan.
Reporting Income
Deferrals Under a
Nonqualified Deferred
Compensation Plan
A new code (Code Y–Deferrals under a section 409A nonqualified deferred compensation plan),
for use in box 12, has been added to the 2005 Form W–2 and the 2005 Instructions for Forms W–2 and
W–3.
The Amer
ican Jobs Creation Act of 2004 added section 409A to the Internal Revenue Code. Section
409A gen
erally takes effect after December 31, 2004, and requires employers to report annual deferrals
under a n
onqualified deferred compensation plan on each employee’s Form W–2. The deferred amounts
should b
e reported in box 12 of Form W–2, using Code Y.
2004–47 I.R.B.872November 22, 2004

Definition of Terms
Revenue rulings and revenue procedures
(hereinafter referred to as “rulings”) that
have an effect on previous rulings use the
following defined terms to describe the ef-
fect:
Amplifieddescribes a situation where
no change is being made in a prior pub-
lished position, but the prior position is be-
ingextendedtoapplytoavariationofthe
fact situation set forth therein. Thus, if
an earlier ruling held that a principle ap-
plied to A, and the new ruling holds that the
same principle also applies to B, the earlier
ruling is amplified. (Compare withmodi-
fied,below).
Clarifiedis used in those instances
where the language in a prior ruling is be-
ing made clear because the language has
caused, or may cause, some confusion.
It is not used where a position in a prior
ruling is being changed.
Distinguisheddescribes a situation
where a ruling mentions a previously pub-
lished ruling and points out an essential
difference between them.
Modifiedis used where the substance
of a previously published position is being
changed. Thus, if a prior ruling held that a
principle applied to A but not to B, and the
new ruling holds that it applies to both A
and B, the prior ruling is modified because
it corrects a published position. (Compare
withamplifiedandclarified, above).
Obsoleteddescribes a previously pub-
lished ruling that is not considered deter-
minative with respect to future transac-
tions. This term is most commonly used in
a ruling that lists previously published rul-
ings that are obsoleted because of changes
in laws or regulations. A ruling may also
be obsoleted because the substance has
been included in regulations subsequently
adopted.
Revokeddescribes situations where the
position in the previously published ruling
is not correct and the correct position is
beingstatedinanewruling.
Supersededdescribes a situation where
the new ruling does nothing more than re-
state the substance and situation of a previ-
ously published ruling (or rulings). Thus,
the term is used to republish under the
1986 Code and regulations the same po-
sition published under the 1939 Code and
regulations. The term is also used when
it is desired to republish in a single rul-
ing a series of situations, names, etc., that
were previously published over a period of
time in separate rulings. If the new rul-
ing does more than restate the substance
of a prior ruling, a combination of terms
is used. For example,modifiedandsu-
persededdescribes a situation where the
substance of a previously published ruling
is being changed in part and is continued
without change in part and it is desired to
restate the valid portion of the previously
published ruling in a new ruling that is self
contained. In this case, the previously pub-
lished ruling is first modified and then, as
modified, is superseded.
Supplementedis used in situations in
which a list, such as a list of the names of
countries, is published in a ruling and that
list is expanded by adding further names in
subsequent rulings. After the original rul-
ing has been supplemented several times, a
new ruling may be published that includes
the list in the original ruling and the ad-
ditions, and supersedes all prior rulings in
the series.
Suspendedis used in rare situations
to show that the previous published rul-
ings will not be applied pending some
future action such as the issuance of new
or amended regulations, the outcome of
cases in litigation, or the outcome of a
Service study.
Abbreviations
The fol
lowing abbreviations in current use
and for
merly used will appear in material
publis
hedintheBulletin.
A—Individual.
Acq.—A
cquiescence.
B—Individual.
BE—Beneficiary.
BK—Bank
.
B.T.A.—Board of Tax Appeals.
C—Individual.
C.B.—Cu
mulative Bulletin.
CFR—Code of Federal Regulations.
CI—City.
COOP—Coo
perative.
Ct.D.—Court Decision.
CY—County.
D—Decede
nt.
DC—Dummy Corporation.
DE—Donee.
Del. Order
—Delegation Order.
DISC—Domestic International Sales Corporation.
DR—Donor.
E—Estate.
EE—Employee.
E.O.—Executive Order.
ER—Emp
loyer.
ERISA—Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
EX—Executor.
F—Fiduc
iary.
FC—Foreign Country.
FICA—Federal Insurance Contributions Act.
FISC—Fo
reign International Sales Company.
FPH—Foreign Personal Holding Company.
F.R.—Federal Register.
FUTA—Fed
eral Unemployment Tax Act.
FX—Foreign corporation.
G.C.M.—Chief Counsel’s Memorandum.
GE—Grante
e.
GP—General Partner.
GR—Grantor.
IC—Insura
nce Company.
I.R.B.—Internal Revenue Bulletin.
LE—Lessee.
LP—Limited
Partner.
LR—Lessor.
M—Minor.
Nonacq.—No
nacquiescence.
O—Organization.
P—Parent Corporation.
PHC—Persona
l Holding Company.
PO—Possession of the U.S.
PR—Partner.
PRS—Pa
rtnership.
PTE—Prohibited Transaction Exemption.
Pub. L.—Public Law.
REIT—Re
al Estate Investment Trust.
Rev. Proc.—Revenue Procedure.
Rev. Rul.—Revenue Ruling.
S—Subsi
diary.
S.P.R.—Statement of Procedural Rules.
Stat.—Statutes at Large.
T—Target
Corporation.
T.C.—Tax Court.
T.D.—Treasury Decision.
TFE—Trans
feree.
TFR—Transferor.
T.I.R.—Technical Information Release.
TP—Taxpay
er.
TR—Trust.
TT—Trustee.
U.S.C.—Uni
ted States Code.
X—Corporation.
Y—Corporation.
Z—Corporat
ion.
November 22, 2004i2004–47 I.R.B.

Numerical Finding List
1
Bulletins 2004–27 through 2004–47
Announcements:
2004-55, 2004-27 I.R.B.15
2004-56, 2004-28 I.R.B.41
2004-57, 2004-27 I.R.B.15
2004-58, 2004-29 I.R.B.66
2004-59, 2004-30 I.R.B.94
2004-60, 2004-29 I.R.B.43
2004-61, 2004-29 I.R.B.67
2004-62, 2004-30 I.R.B.103
2004-63, 2004-31 I.R.B.149
2004-64, 2004-35 I.R.B.402
2004-65, 2004-33 I.R.B.300
2004-66, 2004-35 I.R.B.402
2004-67, 2004-36 I.R.B.459
2004-68, 2004-38 I.R.B.508
2004-69, 2004-39 I.R.B.542
2004-70, 2004-39 I.R.B.543
2004-71, 2004-40 I.R.B.569
2004-72, 2004-41 I.R.B.650
2004-73, 2004-39 I.R.B.543
2004-74, 2004-40 I.R.B.579
2004-75, 2004-40 I.R.B.580
2004-76, 2004-40 I.R.B.588
2004-77, 2004-41 I.R.B.662
2004-78, 2004-40 I.R.B.592
2004-79, 2004-41 I.R.B.662
2004-80, 2004-41 I.R.B.663
2004-81, 2004-42 I.R.B.675
2004-82, 2004-45 I.R.B.834
2004-83, 2004-43 I.R.B.712
2004-84, 2004-43 I.R.B.712
2004-85, 2004-43 I.R.B.712
2004-86, 2004-46 I.R.B.842
2004-87, 2004-45 I.R.B.834
2004-88, 2004-44 I.R.B.779
2004-89, 2004-45 I.R.B.835
2004-90, 2004-45 I.R.B.835
2004-91, 2004-45 I.R.B.835
2004-92, 2004-45 I.R.B.835
2004-94, 2004-46 I.R.B.842
2004-95, 2004-46 I.R.B.845
2004-96, 2004-47 I.R.B.872
Notices:
2004-41, 2004-28 I.R.B.31
2004-43, 2004-27 I.R.B.10
2004-44, 2004-28 I.R.B.32
2004-45, 2004-28 I.R.B.33
2004-46, 2004-29 I.R.B.46
2004-47, 2004-29 I.R.B.48
2004-48, 2004-30 I.R.B.88
2004-49, 2004-30 I.R.B.88
Notices— Continued:
2004-50, 2004-33 I.R.B.196
2004-51, 2004-30 I.R.B.89
2004-52, 2004-32 I.R.B.168
2004-53, 2004-33 I.R.B.209
2004-54, 2004-33 I.R.B.209
2004-55, 2004-34 I.R.B.319
2004-56, 2004-35 I.R.B.375
2004-57, 2004-35 I.R.B.376
2004-58, 2004-39 I.R.B.520
2004-59, 2004-36 I.R.B.447
2004-60, 2004-40 I.R.B.564
2004-61, 2004-41 I.R.B.596
2004-62, 2004-40 I.R.B.565
2004-63, 2004-41 I.R.B.597
2004-64, 2004-41 I.R.B.598
2004-65, 2004-41 I.R.B.599
2004-66, 2004-42 I.R.B.677
2004-67, 2004-41 I.R.B.600
2004-68, 2004-43 I.R.B.706
2004-69, 2004-43 I.R.B.706
2004-70, 2004-44 I.R.B.724
2004-71, 2004-45 I.R.B.793
2004-72, 2004-46 I.R.B.840
2004-73, 2004-46 I.R.B.841
2004-77, 2004-47 I.R.B.855
Proposed Regulations:
REG-208246-90, 2004-36 I.R.B.450
REG-138176-02, 2004-43 I.R.B.710
REG-153841-02, 2004-31 I.R.B.145
REG-163679-02, 2004-35 I.R.B.390
REG-163909-02, 2004-38 I.R.B.499
REG-108637-03, 2004-37 I.R.B.472
REG-120616-03, 2004-37 I.R.B.474
REG-124405-03, 2004-35 I.R.B.394
REG-131486-03, 2004-28 I.R.B.36
REG-131786-03, 2004-38 I.R.B.500
REG-145987-03, 2004-39 I.R.B.523
REG-145988-03, 2004-42 I.R.B.693
REG-149524-03, 2004-39 I.R.B.528
REG-150562-03, 2004-32 I.R.B.175
REG-152549-03, 2004-36 I.R.B.451
REG-154077-03, 2004-37 I.R.B.476
REG-169135-03, 2004-42 I.R.B.697
REG-171386-03, 2004-37 I.R.B.477
REG-101282-04, 2004-42 I.R.B.698
REG-101447-04, 2004-34 I.R.B.344
REG-106889-04, 2004-38 I.R.B.501
REG-114726-04, 2004-47 I.R.B.857
REG-116265-04, 2004-38 I.R.B.505
REG-117307-04, 2004-28 I.R.B.39
REG-124872-04, 2004-39 I.R.B.533
REG-128767-04, 2004-39 I.R.B.534
REG-129274-04, 2004-40 I.R.B.567
REG-129706-04, 2004-37 I.R.B.478
Proposed Regulations— Continued:
REG-129771-04, 2004-36 I.R.B.453
REG-130863-04, 2004-39 I.R.B.538
REG-131264-04, 2004-38 I.R.B.506
REG-135898-04, 2004-40 I.R.B.568
REG-136481-04, 2004-37 I.R.B.480
Revenue Procedures:
2004-38, 2004-27 I.R.B.10
2004-39, 2004-29 I.R.B.49
2004-40, 2004-29 I.R.B.50
2004-41, 2004-30 I.R.B.90
2004-42, 2004-31 I.R.B.121
2004-43, 2004-31 I.R.B.124
2004-44, 2004-31 I.R.B.134
2004-45, 2004-31 I.R.B.140
2004-46, 2004-31 I.R.B.142
2004-47, 2004-32 I.R.B.169
2004-48, 2004-32 I.R.B.172
2004-49, 2004-33 I.R.B.210
2004-50, 2004-33 I.R.B.211
2004-51, 2004-33 I.R.B.294
2004-52, 2004-34 I.R.B.319
2004-53, 2004-34 I.R.B.320
2004-54, 2004-34 I.R.B.325
2004-55, 2004-34 I.R.B.343
2004-56, 2004-35 I.R.B.376
2004-57, 2004-38 I.R.B.498
2004-58, 2004-41 I.R.B.602
2004-59, 2004-42 I.R.B.678
2004-60, 2004-42 I.R.B.682
2004-61, 2004-43 I.R.B.707
2004-62, 2004-44 I.R.B.728
2004-63, 2004-45 I.R.B.795
Revenue Rulings:
2004-63, 2004-27 I.R.B.6
2004-64, 2004-27 I.R.B.7
2004-65, 2004-27 I.R.B.1
2004-66, 2004-27 I.R.B.4
2004-67, 2004-28 I.R.B.28
2004-68, 2004-31 I.R.B.118
2004-69, 2004-36 I.R.B.445
2004-70, 2004-37 I.R.B.460
2004-71, 2004-30 I.R.B.74
2004-72, 2004-30 I.R.B.77
2004-73, 2004-30 I.R.B.80
2004-74, 2004-30 I.R.B.84
2004-75, 2004-31 I.R.B.109
2004-76, 2004-31 I.R.B.111
2004-77, 2004-31 I.R.B.119
2004-78, 2004-31 I.R.B.108
2004-79, 2004-31 I.R.B.106
2004-80, 2004-32 I.R.B.164
2004-81, 2004-32 I.R.B.161
2004-82, 2004-35 I.R.B.350
1
A cumulative list of all revenue rulings, revenueprocedures, Treasury decisions, etc., publishedin Internal Revenue Bulletins 2004–1 through 2004–26 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin
2004–26, dated June 28, 2004.
2004–47 I.R.B.iiNovember 22, 2004

Revenue Rulings— Continued:
2004-83, 2004-32 I.R.B.157
2004-84, 2004-32 I.R.B.163
2004-85, 2004-33 I.R.B.189
2004-86, 2004-33 I.R.B.191
2004-87, 2004-32 I.R.B.154
2004-88, 2004-32 I.R.B.165
2004-89, 2004-34 I.R.B.301
2004-90, 2004-34 I.R.B.317
2004-91, 2004-35 I.R.B.357
2004-92, 2004-37 I.R.B.466
2004-93, 2004-37 I.R.B.462
2004-94, 2004-38 I.R.B.491
2004-95, 2004-38 I.R.B.492
2004-96, 2004-41 I.R.B.593
2004-97, 2004-39 I.R.B.516
2004-98, 2004-42 I.R.B.664
2004-99, 2004-44 I.R.B.720
2004-100, 2004-44 I.R.B.718
2004-101, 2004-44 I.R.B.719
2004-102, 2004-45 I.R.B.784
2004-103, 2004-45 I.R.B.783
2004-104, 2004-46 I.R.B.837
2004-107, 2004-47 I.R.B.852
2004-108, 2004-47 I.R.B.853
Tax Conventions:
2004-60, 2004-29 I.R.B.43
2004-81, 2004-42 I.R.B.675
Treasury Decisions:
9131, 2004-27 I.R.B.2
9132, 2004-28 I.R.B.16
9133, 2004-28 I.R.B.25
9134, 2004-30 I.R.B.70
9135, 2004-30 I.R.B.69
9136, 2004-31 I.R.B.112
9137, 2004-34 I.R.B.308
9138, 2004-32 I.R.B.160
9139, 2004-38 I.R.B.495
9140, 2004-32 I.R.B.159
9141, 2004-35 I.R.B.359
9142, 2004-34 I.R.B.302
9143, 2004-36 I.R.B.442
9144, 2004-36 I.R.B.413
9145, 2004-37 I.R.B.464
9146, 2004-36 I.R.B.408
9147, 2004-37 I.R.B.461
9148, 2004-37 I.R.B.460
9149, 2004-38 I.R.B.494
9150, 2004-39 I.R.B.514
9151, 2004-38 I.R.B.489
9152, 2004-39 I.R.B.509
9153, 2004-39 I.R.B.517
9154, 2004-40 I.R.B.560
9155, 2004-40 I.R.B.562
9156, 2004-42 I.R.B.669
9157, 2004-40 I.R.B.545
Treasury Decisions— Continued:
9158, 2004-42 I.R.B.665
9160, 2004-45 I.R.B.785
9161, 2004-43 I.R.B.704
November 22, 2004iii2004–47 I.R.B.

Findings List of Current Actions on
Previously Published Items
1
Bulletins 2004–27 through 2004–47
Announcements:
99-76
Obsoleted by
T.D. 9157, 2004-40 I.R.B.545
2003-54
Updated and superseded by
Ann. 2004-72, 2004-41 I.R.B.650
2004-70
Amended by
Ann. 2004-77, 2004-41 I.R.B.662
Notices:
88-128
Supplemented by
Notice 2004-61, 2004-41 I.R.B.596
98-65
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2004-40, 2004-29 I.R.B.50
2001-50
Modified by
Rev. Proc. 2004-46, 2004-31 I.R.B.142
2002-70
Modified by
Notice 2004-65, 2004-41 I.R.B.599
2003-76
Supplemented and superseded by
Notice 2004-67, 2004-41 I.R.B.600
Modified by
Notice 2004-65, 2004-41 I.R.B.599
2004-2
Modified by
Notice 2004-50, 2004-33 I.R.B.196
2004-2,
Corrected by
Ann. 2004-67, 2004-36 I.R.B.459
Proposed Regulations:
INTL-116-90
Withdrawn by
REG-208246-90, 2004-36 I.R.B.450
REG-208254-90
Withdrawn by
REG-136481-04, 2004-37 I.R.B.480
REG-104683-00
Partially withdrawn by
Ann. 2004-64, 2004-35 I.R.B.402
REG-165579-02
Withdrawn by
Ann. 2004-69, 2004-39 I.R.B.542
Proposed Regulations— Continued:
REG-150562-03
Corrected by
Ann. 2004-68, 2004-38 I.R.B.508
Ann. 2004-73, 2004-39 I.R.B.543
Revenue Procedures:
79-61
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2004-44, 2004-31 I.R.B.134
89-37
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2004-90, 2004-34 I.R.B.317
94-64
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2004-38, 2004-27 I.R.B.10
96-18
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2004-90, 2004-34 I.R.B.317
96-53
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2004-40, 2004-29 I.R.B.50
96-60
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2004-53, 2004-34 I.R.B.320
98-41
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2004-56, 2004-35 I.R.B.376
2000-37
Modified by
Rev. Proc. 2004-51, 2004-33 I.R.B.294
2002-9
Modified and amplified by
Rev. Proc. 2004-41, 2004-30 I.R.B.90
2003-28
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2004-58, 2004-41 I.R.B.602
2003-30
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2004-54, 2004-34 I.R.B.325
2003-52
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2004-50, 2004-33 I.R.B.211
2003-73
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2004-62, 2004-44 I.R.B.728
2003-80
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2004-60, 2004-42 I.R.B.682
2003-83
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2004-63, 2004-45 I.R.B.795
Revenue Procedures— Continued:
2004-4
Modified by
Rev. Proc. 2004-44, 2004-31 I.R.B.134
2004-23
Modified by
Rev. Proc. 2004-57, 2004-38 I.R.B.498
Revenue Rulings:
54-379
Superseded by
Rev. Rul. 2004-68, 2004-31 I.R.B.118
58-120
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2004-90, 2004-34 I.R.B.317
62-60
Amplified by
Rev. Proc. 2004-53, 2004-34 I.R.B.320
70-58
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2004-90, 2004-34 I.R.B.317
73-354
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2004-76, 2004-31 I.R.B.111
78-371
Distinguished by
Rev. Rul. 2004-86, 2004-33 I.R.B.191
79-64
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2004-90, 2004-34 I.R.B.317
80-7
Amplified and clarified by
Rev. Rul. 2004-71, 2004-30 I.R.B.74
Rev. Rul. 2004-72, 2004-30 I.R.B.77
Rev. Rul. 2004-73, 2004-30 I.R.B.80
Rev. Rul. 2004-74, 2004-30 I.R.B.84
80-366
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2004-90, 2004-34 I.R.B.317
81-100
Clarified and modified by
Rev. Rul. 2004-67, 2004-28 I.R.B.28
85-70
Amplified and clarified by
Rev. Rul. 2004-71, 2004-30 I.R.B.74
Rev. Rul. 2004-72, 2004-30 I.R.B.77
Rev. Rul. 2004-73, 2004-30 I.R.B.80
Rev. Rul. 2004-74, 2004-30 I.R.B.84
92-105
Distinguished by
Rev. Rul. 2004-86, 2004-33 I.R.B.191
1
A cumulative list of current actions on previously published items in Internal Revenue Bulletins 2004–1 through 2004–26 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2004–26, dated June 28, 2004.
2004–47 I.R.B.ivNovember 22, 2004

Revenue Rulings— Continued:
95-63
Modified by
Rev. Rul. 2004-103, 2004-45 I.R.B.783
2003-118
Supplemented and superseded by
Rev. Rul. 2004-108, 2004-47 I.R.B.853
2003-119
Supplemented and superseded by
Rev. Rul. 2004-107, 2004-47 I.R.B.852
2004-75
Amplified by
Rev. Rul. 2004-97, 2004-39 I.R.B.516
Treasury Decisions:
9031
Removed by
T.D. 9152, 2004-39 I.R.B.509
9141
Corrected by
Ann. 2004-86, 2004-46 I.R.B.842
November 22, 2004v2004–47 I.R.B.
*U.S.Government Printing Office: 2004—3 10–3 65/60162