Questão jurídica principal
Whether the constitutional complaint met the reasoning requirements and could be entered into
Decisão extraída
No. The complaint did not invoke a constitutional right or engage specifically with the decisive cantonal reasoning; new, unsubstantiated allegations were inadmissible.
Fundamentação extraída
The filing failed to satisfy Art. 90(1)(b) OG because it did not clearly and specifically explain the alleged constitutional violation and relied on new factual assertions not heard in this procedure.