Questão jurídica principal
Whether the federal complaints were sufficiently reasoned under Art. 42(2) BGG despite no challenge to the cantonal finding on standing.
Decisão extraída
The complaints did not meet the statutory substantiation requirement because they failed to address the decisive issue of standing in the cantonal proceedings; merits arguments were inadmissible.
Fundamentação extraída
The appellant did not engage with the cantonal court's reason for non-entry. Without showing how the challenged decision violated law, the submissions were insufficient under Art. 42(2) BGG.