Questão jurídica principal
Whether the federal criminal appeal met the mandatory reasoning requirements of Art. 42 LTF.
Decisão extraída
No. The appellant merely asserted his innocence and denied selling drugs, without formulating any legal criticism of the cantonal judgment.
Fundamentação extraída
Under Art. 42(1)-(2) LTF, the appellant must briefly explain how the challenged decision violates the law. Bare denials and assertions of innocence are insufficient; failing this requirement leads to inadmissibility under Art. 108(1)(b) LTF.