Questão jurídica principal
Whether the federal complaint satisfied the reasoning requirement under Art. 42(2) BGG and could be heard under Art. 108 BGG.
Decisão extraída
The complaint did not address the cantonal court's non-entry reasoning and therefore was insufficiently reasoned.
Fundamentação extraída
Before the Federal Supreme Court, only the cantonal appeal court's reasoning for non-entry was relevant. The submissions dealt only with the merits and not with the specific deficiency identified by the cantonal court.