Questão jurídica principal
Whether the appeal met the Federal Supreme Court's reasoning requirements despite not addressing the cost-advance ground for the lower court's non-entry decision.
Decisão extraída
The appeal did not satisfy the reasoning requirements and could not be examined further.
Fundamentação extraída
The appellant failed to discuss the decisive ground of the challenged decision, namely non-payment of the cost advance. The submission therefore did not comply with Art. 42(2) and Art. 106(2) BGG, so the court could not consider the merits.