ATA/519/1998•Villa project in protected zone must respect contiguity
ATA/519/1998Tribunal de Justiça / Câmara Administrativa1 de set. de 1998Confirmed
Extraído pela Omnilex
A villa project in protected zone 4B was examined under the contiguity rule and the aesthetic clause. The court held that contiguity had to be respected in that zone, but found the project compatible with aesthetics because the two blind walls would be hidden, one by trees and the other by an adjoining villa. The decision therefore confirms the project’s compliance with the applicable planning constraints.
LCI art. 106; villa project in a protected 4B zone; contiguity and aesthetics. In protected building zones, the contiguity requirement applies as a binding planning constraint. Compliance with the aesthetic clause is assessed in light of the overall external appearance of the project; blind walls may be tolerated where they are effectively concealed by surrounding vegetation or by adjacent construction, so that the project does not detract from the protected urban fabric.
Descripteurs
CONSTRUCTION ET INSTALLATION; VILLA; ORDRE CONTIGU; ESTHETIQUE; TPE
Normes
LCI.106
Résumé
Un projet de villa dans une zone 4B protégée doit respecter la contiguïté. Le projet respecte la clause d'esthétique. En particulier, les deux murs sans jour seront cachés par des arbres pour l'un et par une villa pour l'autre.
Extraído pela Omnilex
Whether the villa project in protected zone 4B complies with the contiguity requirement.
The project must respect contiguity in this protected zone.
The summary indicates that contiguity is a binding planning requirement for a villa project located in protected zone 4B.
Whether the project complies with the aesthetic clause under LCI.
Yes; the project satisfies the aesthetic requirement.
The two blank walls are not exposed: one will be concealed by trees and the other by an adjoining villa, so the external appearance is acceptable.
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.