ATA/76/1996•No revision grounds based on cited Federal judgment
ATA/76/1996Tribunal de Justiça / Câmara Administrativa6 de fev. de 1996Dismissed
Extraído pela Omnilex
The applicant sought revision in administrative proceedings, relying on a Federal Supreme Court judgment. The court held that this reference did not establish a revision ground under Art. 48 LPA and therefore rejected the request.
Art. 48 LPA; revision in administrative proceedings requires a statutory ground specifically recognized by law. The mere invocation of an ATF, without showing that the judgment reveals a relevant revision fact or legal basis within the meaning of the revision provisions, is insufficient. Revision is inadmissible where the applicant only reargues the case or relies abstractly on case law without satisfying the cumulative conditions for extraordinary review.
Descripteurs
REVISION(DECISION); PROCEDURE ADMINISTRATIVE; PROC
Normes
LPA.48
Résumé
Pas de motif de revision en l'espèce (invocation d'un ATF).
Extraído pela Omnilex
Whether the request for revision met the statutory grounds under Art. 48 LPA by invoking an ATF.
No. The cited Federal Supreme Court judgment did not constitute a valid ground for revision in the circumstances.
The court found that mere invocation of an ATF, without a legally relevant revision ground under Art. 48 LPA, is insufficient.
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.