ATA/796/1998•Inventory listing vs. formal monument protection
ATA/796/1998Tribunal de Justiça / Câmara Administrativa8 de dez. de 1998Dismissed
Extraído pela Omnilex
The court considered a challenge to a monument-protection decision. It held that the appellant had not demonstrated that mere inventory listing was inadequate. Given the subsidiary character of classification, the court found the more stringent measure unnecessary and disproportionate, and dismissed the appeal.
LPMNS 11 al. 2; protection of monuments; distinction between inventory listing and classification: classification constitutes a more intrusive protection measure and is justified only where inventory listing does not sufficiently safeguard the protected interest. The burden lies on the complainant to show the inadequacy of the less severe measure. Absent such proof, and where the additional protection would be unnecessary or disproportionate, classification must be refused (consid. unspecified).
Descripteurs
PROCEDURE DE CLASSEMENT; PROTECTION DES MONUMENTS; MONUMENT; INVENTAIRE; CE
Normes
LPMNS.11 al.2
Résumé
Différence entre une mise à l'inventaire et un classement. La recourante n'a pas démontré que la mise à l'inventaire était insuffisante. Le classement apparait en outre comme une mesure inutile et disproportionnée. .
Extraído pela Omnilex
Whether formal classification of the monument was justified despite existing inventory listing.
The appellant did not show that inventory listing was insufficient; formal classification was unnecessary and disproportionate.
The court distinguished inventory listing from classification and held that the more intrusive measure was not warranted on the record.
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.