ATA/95/1997•One-year domicile requirement for maintenance advance aid
ATA/95/1997Tribunal de Justiça / Câmara Administrativa4 de fev. de 1997Dismissed
Extraído pela Omnilex
The case concerns a request for maintenance advance aid under LARPA. The applicant had not been domiciled in the canton for the required one-year period. The court held that this domicile requirement is a mandatory condition of entitlement and therefore confirmed the refusal of the advance.
Art. 8 al. 1 LARPA; domicile requirement for maintenance advance aid: entitlement presupposes that the claimant has been domiciled in the canton for at least one year. Where this condition is not met, the request is inadmissible on the merits and must be rejected; no discretionary balancing can override the statutory threshold.
Descripteurs
OBLIGATION D'ENTRETIEN; AVANCE(EN GENERAL); DOMICILE; CREANCIER; IP
Normes
LARPA.8 al.1
Résumé
Le bénéficiaire d'une avance ne peut requérir l'aide du scarpa s'il est domicilié dans le canton depuis moins d'un an.
Extraído pela Omnilex
Whether a beneficiary domiciled in the canton for less than one year may claim a maintenance advance under Art. 8(1) LARPA.
No. The one-year domicile requirement is a condition for entitlement, so the applicant cannot demand the advance before meeting it.
The court applied Art. 8(1) LARPA and treated the domicile period as a mandatory eligibility threshold for aid.
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.