92 IK 184/16•Personal advice by certifying lawyer required for insolvency filing
92 IK 184/16Tribunal de Primeira Instância23 de jun. de 2016Direito da insolvênciaInadmissível
Extraído pela Omnilex
The Aachen Local Court dismissed G’s insolvency-opening application as inadmissible. The application was accompanied by a certificate concerning the failure of an out-of-court settlement, but the lawyer who issued it had not personally advised the debtor; that advice had been provided by an employee. The court held that § 305(1) no. 1 InsO requires the certifying lawyer personally to conduct the debtor’s advice. The application was therefore inadmissible, and the debtor was ordered to bear the costs.
InsO § 305(1) no. 1; requirements for the certificate documenting failure of an out-of-court settlement. The certificate satisfies the statutory requirements only where the lawyer issuing it has personally advised the debtor. Advice provided instead by an employee of that lawyer is insufficient. A certificate issued in those circumstances does not meet the requirements of § 305(1) no. 1 InsO, rendering the debtor’s insolvency petition inadmissible.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2016-06-23
Aktenzeichen: 92 IK 184/16
ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGAC1:2016:0623.92IK184.16.00
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Spruchkörper: Richterin am Amtsgericht
Normen: InsO § 305 Abs. 1 Nr. 1
Die Anforderungen an die nach § 305 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 InsO erforderliche Bescheinigung zum Scheitern der außergerichtlichen Einigung sind nur dann erfüllt, wenn der die Bescheinigung ausstellende Rechtsanwalt auch die persönliche Beratung des Schuldners vorgenommen hat. Ist die persönliche Beratung nicht von dem ausstellenden Rechtsanwalt, sondern von einem Mitarbeiter des Rechtsanwalts vorgenommen worden, genügt die Bescheinigung nicht den Anforderungen des § 305 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 InsO. Der Insolvenzantrag ist in diesem Fall unzulässig.
In dem Insolvenzeröffnungsverfahren über das Vermögen
der G
wird der Eröffnungsantrag der Schuldnerin vom 19.05.2016 als unzulässig abgewiesen.
Die Kosten des Verfahrens trägt die Schuldnerin.
Whether the certificate required by § 305(1) no. 1 InsO is sufficient when the certifying lawyer did not personally advise the debtor.
The certificate is insufficient because the issuing lawyer must personally have advised the debtor.
Advice by an employee of the certifying lawyer does not satisfy the statutory requirement that the lawyer issuing the certificate personally advise the debtor.
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.