Recusal requests dismissed as abusive

107 C 533/17Tribunal de Primeira Instância18 de abr. de 2019Direito civilInadmissível

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

Aachen Local Court dismissed as inadmissible the recusal requests submitted by defendant 2 and by defendants 1, 3, and 4. It held that the requests were manifestly abusive because their sole purpose was to delay the proceedings. The court also stated that the request by defendant 2 for a hearing on the law had no connection with the substantive subject matter of the dispute.

Sumário Omnilex

A motion to recuse a judge is inadmissible where it is manifestly abusive and submitted solely to delay proceedings. A request for a hearing on legal matters that has no connection with the substantive subject matter of the dispute does not establish a proper basis for recusal.

Texto completo

Amtsgericht Aachen — 107 C 533/17 — Beschluss

Entscheidungsdatum: 2019-04-18

Aktenzeichen: 107 C 533/17

ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGAC1:2019:0418.107C533.17.01

Dokumenttyp: Beschluss

Spruchkörper: Richter am Amtsgericht

Tenor

werden die Ablehnungsanträge des Beklagten zu 2. vom 00.00.0000 und diejenigen der Beklagten zu 1., 3. und 4. vom 00.00.0000 als unzulässig wegen offensichtlichen Rechtsmissbrauchs verworfen, da diese nur den Zweck verfolgen, den Prozess zu verschleppen. Dass von dem Beklagten zu 2. in seinem Schriftsatz vom 00.00.0000 erbetene rechtliche Gehör hat mit dem sachlichen Gegenstand des Rechtsstreits nicht zu tun.

Palavras-chave

recusalabuse of rightsprocedural delay

The request was inadmissible as an abuse of rights because its sole purpose was to delay the proceedings.

The court found the request to be manifestly abusive and intended solely to delay the case.

The requests were inadmissible as an abuse of rights because their sole purpose was to delay the proceedings.

The court found the requests to be manifestly abusive and intended solely to delay the case.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.