Keeping a cat despite a contractual permission requirement

6 C 727/99Tribunal de Primeira Instância18 de abr. de 2000Direito do arrendamentoRejeitado

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

In a tenancy dispute concerning a cat kept without the landlord’s permission, the court dismissed the plaintiff’s claim. It held that a landlord may nonetheless be required to tolerate a cat even where the lease makes keeping one subject to prior permission. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs. The judgment is provisionally enforceable.

Sumário Omnilex

A contractual requirement to obtain the landlord’s permission before keeping a cat does not invariably entitle the landlord to prohibit the animal. Depending on the circumstances, the landlord may be obliged to tolerate a cat kept by the tenant without prior permission.

Texto completo

Amtsgericht Bonn — 6 C 727/99 — Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2000-04-18

Aktenzeichen: 6 C 727/99

ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGBN:2000:0418.6C727.99.00

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Spruchkörper: 6. Zivilabteilung

Leitsätze

Auch wenn das Halten einer Katze im Mietvertrag unter Erlaubnisvorbehalt steht, kann der Vermieter zur Duldung einer - ohne seine Erlaubnis- mieterseits gehaltenen Katze verpflichtet sein.

Tenor

Die Klage wird abgewiesen.

Die Klägerin trägt die Kosten des Rechtsstreits.

Das Urteil ist vorläufig vollstreckbar.

Ohne Tatbestand gemäß §§ 495 a, 313 a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO

Palavras-chave

tenancykeeping petscatslandlord permission

Questões jurídicas principais extraídas pela Omnilex

Whether the landlord must tolerate the tenant’s cat despite a lease clause requiring prior permission.

A landlord may be obliged to tolerate a cat kept by the tenant without permission, even where the lease makes keeping a cat subject to permission.

Allocation of the costs of the proceedings.

The plaintiff bears the costs of the proceedings.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.