Whether the debtor should be granted residual debt discharge.
The requested residual debt discharge is denied.
98 IK 285/04•Denial of residual debt discharge
98 IK 285/04Tribunal de Primeira Instância22 de jan. de 2009Direito da insolvênciaRejeitado
Extraído pela Omnilex
The Bonn District Court denied the debtor's application for residual debt discharge. It ordered the debtor to bear the costs of the discharge proceeding, while providing that the applicant seeking denial of discharge is primarily liable for court costs vis-à-vis the state. The order cites section 290(1), no. 5, of the German Insolvency Code. The decision states no further factual background or reasons.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2009-01-22
Aktenzeichen: 98 IK 285/04
ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGBN:2009:0122.98IK285.04.00
Dokumenttyp: Beschluss
Spruchkörper: 98. Insolvenzabteilung
Normen: Inso § 290 Abs. 1 Nr.5
wird dem Schuldner die beantragte Restschuldbefreiung versagt.
Die Kosten des Verfahrens über den Antrag auf Restschuldbefreiung trägt der Schuldner; für die Gerichtskosten haftet jedoch im Verhältnis zur Staatskasse vorrangig der Versagungsantragsteller.
Gegenstandswert (§ 28 Abs. 3 RVG): 4 000,00 EUR.
Whether the debtor should be granted residual debt discharge.
The requested residual debt discharge is denied.
Allocation of the costs of the residual debt discharge proceeding.
The debtor bears the proceeding costs, but the denial applicant is primarily liable for court costs vis-à-vis the state.
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.