27 C 111/17•Validity of a condominium resolution prohibiting child day care
27 C 111/17Tribunal de Primeira Instância25 de jan. de 2018Direito civilDeferido
Extraído pela Omnilex
The plaintiffs challenged a resolution adopted by the condominium owners’ meeting on 14 June 2017. The resolution revoked permission for child day care at the property and called for the operation to cease. The Bonn District Court declared the resolution invalid. Applying a typical assessment of the effects on co-owners, it held that care for only two to three children does not cause greater interference. The defendants were ordered to bear the costs of the proceedings.
WEG §§ 14 no. 1, 15(3); BGB § 1004(1); interference with co-owners from child day care. In assessing whether use of a condominium property causes an impermissible impairment, the effects are determined by a typical, not merely individual, assessment. Child day care involving only two to three children does not, as a rule, cause greater impairment to the other co-owners. A resolution requiring cessation of such use cannot therefore be upheld on the ground that the activity exceeds the impairment they must tolerate.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2018-01-25
Aktenzeichen: 27 C 111/17
ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGBN:2018:0125.27C111.17.00
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Spruchkörper: 27. Zivilabteilung
Normen: WEG §§ 14 Nr. 1, 15 Abs. 3; BGB 1004 Abs. 1
Bei der gebotenen typisierenden Betrachtung führt eine Kindertagespflege mit lediglich zwei bis drei Tagespflegekindern nicht zu größeren Beeinträchtigungen der Miteigentümer.
Der in der Eigentümerversammlung der WEG F-C-Str. ##, ##, J-Straße #-#, J1-Straße #, #, # in C vom 14.06.2017 unter TOP 7a) gefasste Beschluss (Widerruf Erlaubnis zur Kindertagespflege und Aufforderung zur Betriebseinstellung) wird für ungültig erklärt.
Die Kosten des Rechtsstreits tragen die Beklagten.
Das Urteil ist hinsichtlich der Kosten gegen Sicherheitsleistung in Höhe von 110% des jeweils zu vollstreckenden Betrages vorläufig vollstreckbar.
Whether the condominium owners’ resolution revoking permission for child day care and requiring the operation to cease was valid.
Day care for only two to three children does not, in a typical assessment, cause greater interference with the co-owners.
The anticipated effects of care for two to three children do not exceed the level of impairment that co-owners must tolerate.
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.