Prohibition on Bypassing a Tenant’s Lawyer

26 C 50287/00Tribunal de Primeira Instância31 de mai. de 2000Direito do arrendamentoDeferido

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

The applicants sought an order preventing the respondent from contacting them directly about her 17 January 2000 rent-increase demand while their lawyer’s mandate remained in force. After an oral hearing, Düsseldorf Local Court granted the request and prohibited personal contact, including by letter, bypassing counsel. It threatened an administrative fine of up to DM 5,000 for each violation, or detention of up to one month if the fine could not be collected. The respondent was ordered to bear the costs of the proceedings.

Texto completo

Amtsgericht Düsseldorf — 26 C 50287/00 — Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2000-05-31

Aktenzeichen: 26 C 50287/00

ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGD:2000:0531.26C50287.00.00

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Spruchkörper: Richter

Tenor

hat das Amtsgericht Düsseldorf, 26. Abteilung,

auf die mündliche Verhandlung vom 26.05.2000

durch den Richter X

für R e c h t erkannt:

Der Antragsgegnerin wird untersagt, im Rahmen der au-

ßergerichtlichen Auseinandersetzung zu ihrem Mieterhö-

hungsverlangen vom 17.01.2000 die Antragsteller per-

sönlich, unter Umgehung ihres Bevollmächtigten, Herrn

Rechtsanwalt X, zu kontaktieren, insbe-

sondere anzuschreiben, so lange das Mandat besteht.

Der Antragsgegnerin wird für jeden Fall der Zuwider-

handlung ein Ordnungsgeld in Höhe von bis zu 5.000,--

DM und für den Fall, daß dieses nicht beigetrieben

werden kann, Ordnungshaft von bis zu einem Monat ange-

droht.

Die Antragsgegnerin trägt die Kosten des Verfahrens.

Palavras-chave

tenancyrent increaselegal representationdirect contactinjunctive relief

Questões jurídicas principais extraídas pela Omnilex

Whether the respondent may be prohibited from contacting the applicants personally, bypassing their lawyer, about the rent-increase demand while the lawyer’s mandate remains in force.

The respondent was prohibited from personally contacting or writing to the applicants about the rent-increase demand while their lawyer’s mandate continued.

The court granted the applicants’ request for an order requiring communications in the out-of-court dispute to be directed through their appointed lawyer.

Allocation of the proceedings’ costs.

The respondent must bear the costs of the proceedings.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.