Claim dismissed; costs allocated equally

44 C 6778/06Tribunal de Primeira Instância26 de set. de 2006Direito civilRejeitado

Abrir fonte

Extraído pela Omnilex

Resumo Omnilex

The claimants’ action was dismissed by the Local Court Düsseldorf in written proceedings under § 495a ZPO. The claimants were ordered to bear the costs equally. The judgment is provisionally enforceable, subject to the stated security provisions. The court allowed an appeal under § 511(4) no. 2 ZPO, finding the legal question concerning lawyers’ remuneration to be of fundamental importance. The judgment identifies the presiding judge only as “XXX”; the parties are not named in the provided text.

Sumário Omnilex

Section 511(4) no. 2 ZPO permits an appeal to be admitted where the legal question decided is of fundamental importance. The court relied on that ground to allow an appeal concerning a question of lawyers’ remuneration. The judgment was rendered in written proceedings under § 495a ZPO.

Texto completo

Amtsgericht Düsseldorf — 44 C 6778/06 — Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2006-09-26

Aktenzeichen: 44 C 6778/06

ECLI: ECLI:DE:AGD:2006:0926.44C6778.06.00

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Spruchkörper: Richter

Tenor

hat das Amtsgericht Düsseldorf

im schriftlichen Verfahren nach § 495 a ZPO

durch den Richter am Amtsgericht XXX

am 26.09.2006

für R e c h t erkannt:

Die Klage wird abgewiesen.

Die Kosten des Rechtsstreits tragen die Kläger zu je ½.

Das Urteil ist vorläufig vollstreckbar.

Die Kläger können die Vollstreckung gegen Sicherheitsleistung in Höhe von 110 % des jeweils zu vollstreckenden Betrages vorläufig abwenden, wenn nicht die Beklagte vor der Vollstreckung Sicherheit in entsprechender Höhe leistet.

Die Berufung war hier nach § 511 Abs. 4 Nr. 2 ZPO wegen der grundsätzli-chen Bedeutung dieser Rechtsfrage für die anwaltliche Vergütung zuzulas-sen.

Palavras-chave

civil procedureclaim dismissalcost allocationappeal admissibilitylawyers’ remuneration

Questões jurídicas principais extraídas pela Omnilex

The claim

The claim was dismissed.

Allocation of the costs of the proceedings

The claimants must bear the costs equally.

Whether to allow an appeal

The appeal was allowed because the issue was of fundamental importance for lawyers’ remuneration.

The court considered the legal question to be of fundamental importance under § 511(4) no. 2 ZPO.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.